মূল বিষয়বস্তুতে যান
এখন

সংঘাত · Kyiv daytime strikes

Two killed at Kyiv science academy; nearby clinic survives with its doors closed

Nataliia Bukalo was among two people killed at Ukraine’s science academy. A separate strike left Dobrobut staff and visitors alive—but injured people and a closed clinic behind.

লিখিত 6 মিনিটে পড়ুন · ১৪৪টি সূত্র

HeyDex

ইংরেজিতে পাওয়া যায়

Nataliia Bukalo had worked at the headquarters of Ukraine’s National Academy of Sciences since 2016. On September 28, a Russian drone strike killed the 44-year-old assistant to the academy’s first vice-president, Volodymyr Horbulin. She left a husband and daughter; her husband, Vyacheslav, was also reported seriously injured in the attack.⁠102⁠108

Fire cut off staff inside the academy’s central Kyiv headquarters, forcing people to escape through windows. Two people were killed and six injured. Roughly an hour later, a second Russian jet-powered drone struck a nearby Dobrobut medical centre, burning clinical and teaching spaces. Everyone among its staff and visitors survived, according to the operator, but one woman remained in intensive care in the following day’s update.⁠53⁠4⁠3⁠49⁠144

The latest established account changes the early picture in two important ways: the academy’s death toll rose from one to two, while the reported death at the medical centre is not supported. The Guardian’s September 28 account had reported at least one person killed at each site; Dobrobut’s own statement that day said all employees and visitors were alive. The two confirmed deaths occurred at the academy.⁠1⁠49⁠11

2People killed at the academy 5311
6People injured at the academy 4
10People receiving care after the Dobrobut strike 144

The first drone hit the academy’s Presidium building at 54 Volodymyrska Street, in the Shevchenkivskyi district, just before or around 13:30 Kyiv time on Monday, September 28, 2026. The second struck Dobrobut at 40 Antonovycha Street, near Olimpiiska metro, several blocks away. These were separate impacts at separate addresses—not two descriptions of the same burning building.⁠21⁠3⁠47

At the academy, the second and third floors were partly destroyed and fire engulfed the upper levels of the three-storey headquarters. Two people were brought down by ladder. The walls remained standing, but the damage was significant. This was the institution’s working-day headquarters; its destruction does not mean every academy institute or laboratory was destroyed.⁠28⁠53⁠29

Academy president Anatoliy Zagorodny initially feared colleagues were still trapped. That was an urgent uncertainty during the fire, not the latest rescue status. Firefighters extinguished the blaze that evening, rescuers recovered a second body from the rubble, and emergency rescue work was reported completed on September 28. Ending the emergency operation did not restore the headquarters to use.⁠1⁠28⁠129

The casualty reports changed as the response unfolded. The initial academy count was one woman killed and three people injured. Intermediate injury counts reached four and five before the emergency-service tally reached six. Interfax’s 20:21 report still carried one death alongside six academy injuries; RBC-Ukraine’s 23:21 update confirmed two deaths. Those are publication times, not established times of death or recovery. Six injured replaces three—it is not six additional casualties.⁠40⁠57⁠42⁠4⁠11

The academy’s September 29 statement settled the known death count in plain terms: “The Russian strike claimed the lives of two people.” It did not describe both victims as titled academicians. State Language Protection Commissioner Taras Kremin had used that description earlier, but the academy’s press service did not confirm it. Two deaths are established; two deceased academicians are not.⁠51⁠12⁠17

Bukalo was born in Buzaky, Volyn, on October 19, 1981. Her farewell was announced for September 30 at 10:00 Kyiv time at 9 Oranzhereina Street, with burial to follow in Volyn. By this report’s September 30, 08:15 UTC information cutoff, the scheduled start had passed, but completion of the ceremony had not been verified. The second person killed had not been publicly identified in the available updates.⁠102⁠107⁠109

Horbulin, the academy’s first vice-president and a former secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, survived with minor injuries from shattered glass. The drone struck a room one floor above his office; he was reported already at home on September 28. His survival and his assistant’s death are documented consequences, not evidence that he was the intended target.⁠13⁠94

Survival did not keep care available

At Dobrobut, the upper floors housed its Academy and the lower floors outpatient clinical services. Both teaching and clinical areas burned. Courtyard-facing windows on the first through third floors were blown out, equipment was damaged, and the roof of a nearby four-storey residential building also caught fire. The network described this as the second attack on its Antonovycha site.⁠44⁠4⁠49

The medical-centre figures describe related but differently scoped groups. Dobrobut initially reported seven injured, including six employees. The State Emergency Service subsequently counted eight injured at and near the address, covering the medical centre and neighbouring residential building, including a rescued resident. On September 29, Dobrobut said ten people had received care following the strike. These figures must not be added together or treated as interchangeable final injury totals.⁠49⁠4⁠144

Nine of those ten people were already at home. One woman remained in intensive care in serious but stable condition. Being home does not mean the other nine were uninjured or needed no further treatment. No later public condition update for the woman was established before the September 30 cutoff.⁠144

The Antonovycha clinic remained closed in its September 29 update while damage was assessed and a recovery plan prepared. Dobrobut Academy activities continued online or at other locations, but no restored on-site patient services were established. An apparently reassuring reopening notice concerned August 29, 2025, after an earlier attack—not recovery from this September’s strike.⁠144⁠68

The distinction matters beyond correcting a date. Survival at a medical facility is not the same as preserving access to care. The fire ended; the interruption to services had not, in the latest dated operating update.

Kyiv’s wider casualty count also needs a boundary. The citywide injury figure progressed from 14 to 19 and then 24 during September 28. The later count included three children, with six people hospitalized, two of them children. These totals cover attacks across Kyiv, not just the academy and Dobrobut. They cannot be added to the site-specific counts or used to place all three injured children inside either institution.⁠57⁠20⁠22

Science, war and the targeting question

The academy headquarters was also a historic building: architect Oleksandr Beretti built it in 1851–52 as Countess Levashova’s boarding school for girls, and a third floor was added in 1891–92. Ukraine’s academy was founded in 1918; the building was transferred to it in February 1919 and became its Presidium seat that year. The attack damaged more than a set of offices, though the full repair requirements remain unknown.⁠120⁠121⁠124

We are not connected with the military. This is an attack on science. It is terrorism.

Anatoliy Zagorodny 1

Zagorodny’s characterization is separate from proof of either weapon’s programmed aim. Some academy-affiliated institutes have supported wartime technologies, including drones and vehicle armour, as The New York Times reported on September 29. That does not establish a military operation inside the Presidium building, or make the clinic a demonstrated military objective. Russia’s Defence Ministry described strikes on fuel and telecommunications infrastructure and several data centres in Kyiv that day, but did not publicly name the Presidium, Dobrobut or Horbulin as intended targets.⁠41⁠112

What is established is the direct impact on scientific and medical premises during the day. The academy’s response was to demand consequences within the scientific world. Its September 29 appeal asked academies, universities, research centres, foundations, international scientific organisations and publishers “not to resume or legitimize institutional cooperation with Russian state scientific and educational institutions as long as Russia is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine.” That concerns institutional ties with Russian state bodies for the duration of the war, not every individual scientific contact.⁠53⁠51

যা জানা গেছে

  • Two people died at the academy, its emergency rescue operation ended on September 28, and Dobrobut remained closed in its September 29 operating update. 53129144

যা অজানা

  • The second academy victim’s identity, subsequent conditions of Vyacheslav Bukalo and the woman in intensive care, and the timetable for repairs remain unestablished.

এরপর

  • Watch for dated clinical updates, identification of the second victim, and a verified announcement restoring on-site patient services at Antonovycha.

সূত্রসমূহ82

এখানে উদ্ধৃত সূত্রগুলোর মধ্যে ukrinform.de প্রথম প্রকাশ করেছে, এই প্রতিবেদন প্রচারের ৫ দিন আগে। এরপর আরও ৪৮টি সংবাদমাধ্যম প্রকাশ করেছে।
  1. ukrinform.de
  2. The Kyiv Independent
  3. Kyiv Post
  4. Interfax-Ukraine
  5. X (formerly Twitter)
  6. hromadske
  7. ukrinform.net
  8. RBC-Ukraine
  9. +আরও ৪১টি সংবাদমাধ্যম
  10. HeyDay News

প্রেক্ষাপট জানতে আগের ৫টি প্রতিবেদন পড়া হয়েছে।তারিখ নেই এমন ৩০টি সংবাদমাধ্যম:dobrobut.comnas.gov.uaUnnamed channelusnews.comReutersThe Athletic

সংবাদমাধ্যম অনুযায়ী সব সূত্র

৮২ সংবাদমাধ্যম থেকে ১৪৪ সূত্র· সর্বাধিক উদ্ধৃত আগে

যেভাবে প্রচারিত
  1. Flames cut off staff inside Ukraine’s science academy, forcing them to escape through windows. Two people died and six were injured. A separate drone struck a nearby medical centre, interrupting patient care and leaving one woman in intensive care. With the academy rescue operation complete, what remains unresolved for the victims, and when can medical services return?
  2. Two Russian jet-powered drones struck different buildings several blocks apart on September twenty-eighth, twenty twenty-six. The first hit the National Academy of Sciences’ Presidium headquarters at fifty-four Volodymyrska Street, in Kyiv’s Shevchenkivskyi district, just before or around one-thirty in the afternoon. Roughly an hour later, another hit Dobrobut at forty Antonovycha Street, near Olimpiiska metro, in Holosiivskyi district. These were separate impacts, not two names for the same attack. The two deaths occurred at the academy. The initial claim that someone also died at the medical centre is not supported; all Dobrobut employees and visitors survived.
  3. The academy’s second and third floors were partly destroyed. Fire engulfed the upper levels of the three-storey headquarters, burning extensively above the first floor. Staff escaped through windows, and two people were brought down by ladder. The walls remained standing, but the damage was significant. This was an attack on the institution’s working-day headquarters, not evidence that every academy institute or laboratory had been destroyed.
  4. The academy death toll rose from one to two after rescuers recovered a second body from the rubble that evening. Injury counts moved from three through four and five to six. Six replaces the initial three; it does not mean six additional injuries. At twenty twenty-one, the public count still listed one death alongside six injuries. At twenty-three twenty-one, the death count had risen to two. Those are update times, not established times of death or body recovery. Firefighters extinguished the fire, and emergency rescue work was completed that evening. Initial fears that colleagues remained trapped were overtaken by that completed operation. Descriptions of recovery continuing on September twenty-ninth did not reflect the later official rescue status. Completion of rescue work does not mean the headquarters was repaired or normal operations resumed.
  5. Nataliia Mykolaivna Bukalo was one of the two people killed. She was forty-four, an assistant to academy first vice-president Volodymyr Horbulin, and had worked at the Presidium since twenty sixteen. Born on October nineteenth, nineteen eighty-one, in Buzaky in Volyn, she left a husband and daughter. Her husband, Vyacheslav Bukalo, was also seriously injured. The second person killed had not been publicly identified by September thirtieth.
  6. Horbulin survived with minor injuries from shattered glass. The drone struck a room one floor above his office, and he was already at home on September twenty-eighth. He is a former secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council. His injuries and his assistant’s death do not establish that he was the intended target. Nor does confirmation of two deaths validate the early description of two deceased academicians. The academy did not confirm that both victims held that title; its subsequent statement described two people killed.
  7. Bukalo’s farewell was announced for September thirtieth at ten in the morning, Kyiv time, at nine Oranzhereina Street, with burial to follow in Volyn. By the information cutoff, September thirtieth at eight-fifteen UTC, the scheduled start had passed. Completion of the ceremony had not been verified.
  8. The damaged headquarters had served the academy since nineteen nineteen. Architect Oleksandr Beretti built it in eighteen fifty-one and fifty-two as Countess Levashova’s boarding school for girls. A third floor was added in eighteen ninety-one and ninety-two. The academy itself was founded in nineteen eighteen; the building was transferred to it in February nineteen nineteen and became its Presidium seat that year. The distinction matters: the institution’s founding and its occupation of this headquarters were separate events.
  9. Fire damaged both medical care and teaching space at Dobrobut. Its Academy occupied the upper floors, with outpatient clinical services below. Courtyard-facing windows on the first through third floors were blown out, and medical equipment was damaged. The roof of a nearby four-storey residential building also caught fire. The medical network described this as the second attack on its Antonovycha site. The consequences extended beyond putting out the flames: patients lost on-site access to a damaged clinic.
  10. Ten people had received care after the Dobrobut strike by September twenty-ninth, but that is not an interchangeable final injury count. The initial clinic tally was seven injured, including six employees. The emergency-service tally was eight injured at and near the address, covering the medical centre and neighbouring residential building, including a rescued resident. The later ten-person figure counts people receiving care. These groups must not be added together. Calling all ten injured, without preserving the care wording, would erase an important difference in scope.
  11. One woman remained in intensive care in serious but stable condition in the September twenty-ninth update. Nine of the ten people who received care were already at home. Being home does not establish that they were uninjured or needed no further treatment. No later public condition update for the woman was established before the September thirtieth cutoff.
  12. The Antonovycha clinic remained closed in its September twenty-ninth operating update. Damage assessment and recovery planning were underway, with no restored on-site services established. Dobrobut Academy activities continued online or at other locations. A reopening notice dated August twenty-ninth, twenty twenty-five, concerned recovery after an earlier attack. It cannot establish reopening after this September’s strike. No September twenty twenty-six reopening was verified.
  13. Kyiv’s citywide injury count rose from fourteen to nineteen and then twenty-four during September twenty-eighth. Nineteen injured, with six receiving hospital treatment, was an intermediate snapshot. The later count included three injured children, with six people hospitalized, two of them children. These figures cover attacks across Kyiv, not just the academy and Dobrobut. They cannot be added to the site-specific counts or used to place all three injured children inside either institution. Earlier nationwide totals of at least seven dead and more than fifty wounded also covered a much wider area; they were not Kyiv-only figures.
  14. Some academy-affiliated institutes have supported wartime technologies, including drones and vehicle armour. That broader research activity does not establish that a military operation was taking place in the Presidium building, that Horbulin was selected as a target, or that the clinic was a military objective. Calling the strike terrorism is a characterization separate from proof of either weapon’s programmed aim. The stated Russian targets that day were fuel and telecommunications infrastructure and several data centres in Kyiv. Neither the academy Presidium, Dobrobut nor Horbulin was publicly named as an intended target.
  15. The headquarters stands near the National Opera, St Volodymyr’s Cathedral, the German embassy and Ukrtelecom offices. Their proximity locates the impact in Kyiv’s central institutional district; it does not establish which building either drone was programmed to hit. Direct impacts on scientific and medical premises during the day are established. The precise intended aim of either weapon remains unknown.
  16. The academy is asking the international scientific community to withhold renewed or legitimized institutional cooperation with Russian state science and education while the war continues. Its September twenty-ninth appeal addresses academies, universities, research centres, scientific foundations, international scientific organisations and publishers. That is a demand concerning institutional ties with Russian state bodies, not a demand to sever every individual scientific contact. The academy had already cut cooperation with Russian scientific organisations and scientists in twenty twenty-two. The Russian academy’s membership in ALLEA, the European federation of academies, remained suspended.
  17. The immediate rescue uncertainty at the academy is resolved: a second victim was recovered and the emergency operation ended on September twenty-eighth. The remaining unknowns are the second victim’s identity, subsequent medical updates for Vyacheslav Bukalo and the woman in intensive care, and the scale and timetable of repairs. There is no verified date for patients to return to the Antonovycha clinic. Its staff and visitors survived, but its doors remained closed in the September twenty-ninth operating update.

সম্প্রতি প্রচারিত