Economía · Tech industries flood racesLa ventaja inicial de 517 millones de dólares que convirtió las primarias en las verdaderas eleccionesEscrito 7 de septiembre de 2026 a las 21:22 UTCVerTranscripción0:00A $1 million primary now takes $300:02million to survive. The shift has0:04already pushed corporate spending on0:06House and Senate races past the entire0:08last cycle's record with months still to0:10go before November and strategists in0:12both parties say candidates are changing0:14how they vote and speak to avoid being0:16targeted. Who is putting up nine figures0:18to choose nominees before voters ever0:20reach the general election and what are0:22they buying? The most consequential0:24change is at the primary. A House or0:26Senate [music] primary that cost about0:27$1 million five years ago now costs tens0:30of millions if an outside industry0:32decides to engage. That 10 to 30-fold0:34jump [music] makes the primary the0:35cheapest place to install an ally and0:37punish an opponent long before a general0:39election is fought. In 15 months through0:41the first quarter of 2026, [music]0:43companies spent $517 million on House0:46and Senate races. That alone beats the0:48$461 million record for all of 2024.0:51[music]0:52At least $294 million comes from crypto,0:55artificial intelligence, [music] and0:57online betting alone. Overall ad0:59spending is now projected at $11.61:01billion just above the last record of1:03$11.2 billion. The logic behind the1:05money has flipped. [music] Instead of1:07backing one party, donors now fund1:09whichever candidate in either party's1:11primary supports a preferred regulatory1:13outcome on market structure, AI rules,1:15or betting1:15>> [music]1:16>> and pay to defeat whoever threatens it.1:18Nine-figure bets are being placed across1:19eight battleground [music] states on1:21that basis with much of the money moving1:23through super PACs and affiliates that1:24report on different schedules. The field1:26operation at the center of the1:27battleground bets focuses on turnout in1:30a non-presidential year, door-knocking,1:32digital ads, and direct mail aimed at1:34lower propensity conservative voters.1:36Initial Senate targets described are1:38Alaska, Iowa, [music] Maine, Michigan,1:40and Ohio with possible extension to1:42North Carolina, Georgia, and Texas plus1:45House activity in California, Wisconsin,1:47and Washington. [music]1:48The exact eight-state list varies across1:50accounts and matters because field costs1:52and voter contact pools differ sharply1:54by state. The largest single bet is tied1:56[music] to Elon Musk through America1:58PAC, the same super PAC active in 20242:01authorized to spend 100 to 120 million2:04dollars on that Republican2:05get-out-the-vote program. By late2:07[music] July, the PAC had already spent2:09about 52.3 million dollars since January2:111st, 2025. No direct on-record quote2:14from Musk confirming the exact range has2:17been published. The authorization was2:18reported July 30th [music] by two2:20sources briefed on the plans and the PAC2:23confirmed it expects a major turnout2:25without confirming the number. The2:26second anchor is Meta Platforms with 652:29million dollars for state races alone,2:31directed to four [music] different super2:32PACs backing candidates from both2:34parties where AI, infrastructure,2:35energy, and state AI regulation are at2:37stake. That breaks into roughly 452:40million to the American Technology2:42Excellence Project [music] and about 202:43million to a California-specific vehicle2:46with additional portions to affiliates2:47including Forge [music] the Future and2:49Making Our Tomorrow. The company2:51declined to comment and disclosures2:52appear through IRS forms [music] and2:54California Secretary of State filings2:56with technical delays noted. With2:58spending already underway in places like3:00Texas and Illinois [music] starting in3:01late 2025, two networks define why3:04candidates are running scared. The3:06crypto PAC Fairshake entered with about3:08193 million dollars and still held about3:11130 million by mid-year after spending3:14tens of millions.3:15>> [music]3:15>> It operates through party-specific3:16affiliates to reward pro-crypto voices3:19and spend in whichever [music] primary3:20will decide the seat. The OpenAI-linked3:23to Leading the Future raised about 1403:25million by mid-August, in some tallies3:27overtaking Fairshake for the period3:28[music] backed by Marc Andreessen, Ben3:30Horowitz, Greg Brockman and his wife3:32Anna, and Joe Lonsdale running American3:34Mission for Republicans and Think3:36[music] Big for Democrats. OpenAI as a3:38company has at times distanced itself3:40while the personal funding link remains.3:42Both model the 2024 playbook, [music]3:44intervene early in low-turnout primaries3:47where a few million can decide the3:48nominee. For an incumbent or challenger,3:51the math is personal. [music]3:52A house primary once planned around $13:54million in local fundraising must now3:56anticipate $10 to $30 million in outside3:59spending if an [music] industry pack4:00engages. That changes how regulation is4:02talked about, how votes are scheduled,4:04and how amendments are weighed [music]4:05because the threat is not the loss of4:07future contributions, but a funded4:08opponent in the next primary. With4:11bipartisan [music] money from Meta and4:12with parallel Democratic and Republican4:14affiliates on both industry networks,4:17there is no partisan shelter. Unlimited4:19super PAC spending [music] after4:20Citizens United supplies the vehicle,4:22new wealth concentration supplies the4:24capital, urgent windows around crypto4:26market structure, [music]4:27AI infrastructure, and betting rules4:29supply the motive, and state4:30legislatures and primaries [music]4:32supply the cheapest return on investment4:33compared with national general4:35elections. What remains unresolved is4:37verification and [music] mapping.4:39Neither the $100 to $120 million figure,4:42nor the $65 [music]4:43million figure has been fully4:45substantiated in final filings for the4:46full period. They rest on sourced4:48reporting and partial disclosures. The4:50definitive [music] eight battlegrounds,4:52the complete roster of primaries now4:54drawing tens of millions, and the full4:56overall total if the visible [music]4:57sums are only a fraction will become4:59clearer as third quarter Federal5:01Election Commission, [music] IRS, and5:03state reports are published. The open5:05question is not whether primary costs5:07have exploded. They have from about $15:08million to tens of millions, and record5:10company spending above $500 million5:12already proves it. The question is which5:14seats absorb the next wave, and whether5:16that transactional spending changes5:17votes on regulation before any voter5:19reaches the ballot box.5:21Like and follow for more stories that5:23matter.Leer el artículoCronología de la historiaHeyDexEl vídeo breve ↗
