Conflictos · Lavrov accuses US822 drones sobre Rusia: el enorme ataque ucraniano está verificado, pero no la afirmación sobre Lavrov y EE. UU.Escrito 7 de septiembre de 2026 a las 21:22 UTCVerTranscripción0:00On August 15th, Russian [music] Foreign0:01Minister Sergey Lavrov accused the0:03United States of providing intelligence0:05and planning [music] Ukrainian strikes0:06on civilian targets deep inside Russia0:09and threatened to destroy Western0:10supplies to Ukraine. The accusation0:12centers on Lavrov, while the wider0:14diplomatic freeze involves [music] the0:16two presidents who met in Anchorage and0:18the top diplomats who later met briefly0:19in Manila. This account comes from a0:21single video publication on August 15th0:24and has not yet been independently0:26corroborated, a limit on what can be0:28verified right now. Relations have0:30cooled in the years since that Anchorage0:31meeting. No peace talks have taken place0:33since February and the new accusation0:36and threat on August 15th marks the0:37sharpest escalation since. The claims0:40include direct US involvement in0:41planning strikes on civilian targets far0:43inside Russia, a threat aimed at Western0:46aid flows, and a rejection of the0:48Turkish-backed Black Sea ceasefire0:50alongside casualty and calendar figures0:52presented as claims inside the same0:53video. As diplomacy stalled, Ukraine0:56expanded strikes using domestically0:57produced drones targeting Russian oil0:59refineries and Wildberries warehouses, a1:02pressure campaign that Lavrov now1:03directly links to Washington in an1:05apparent bid to limit aid and1:06intelligence sharing. Analysts in the1:08same account warn the pattern points to1:10a prolonged grinding war, more civilians1:12exposed,1:13>> [music]1:13>> Ukrainian missile defense interceptors1:15in critical shortage, and the prospect1:17of winter attacks that could make cities1:18unlivable while repression inside Russia1:21continues. The [music] immediate stakes1:22are escalation over aid convoys and1:25intelligence flows and more exposure for1:27civilians with no diplomatic off-ramp1:29[music] as ceasefire and talk channels1:30sit empty. What evidence, if any,1:33supports [music] the claim Washington1:34plans strikes on civilian targets, which1:36specific Western supplies would be1:37targeted, and whether [music] any action1:39has followed, what the terms and status1:41of the Turkish-backed Black Sea1:42ceasefire are, whether or when US-Russia1:44talks will resume, and how severe the1:46drone campaign damage and missile1:47defense shortages truly are all remain1:49unanswered.1:51Like and follow for more stories that1:52matter.Leer el artículoCronología de la historiaHeyDexEl vídeo breve ↗
