Transkrip 0:09 On September 28th, we reported ongoing vehicle checks. 0:13 Those examinations found no improvised explosive devices. 0:16 Petrol was recovered, five men remain under investigation on bail, and the 0:21 government now suspects Iranian involvement without disclosing its evidence. 0:25 What can investigators establish about the petrol, the men's purpose, and possible 0:29 foreign direction? 0:30 Petrol is the confirmed recovery, not a homemade bomb. 0:34 Extensive examinations of three vehicles, assisted by military assets and forensic 0:39 experts, found no improvised explosive devices. 0:42 The finding announced on September 29th changes the original suspected bomb 0:46 description. 0:47 Early assessments of material consistent with explosive devices were provisional. 0:51 Claims that explosives had been found or that a serious attempted attack was 0:55 disrupted at a late stage are not confirmed by the completed examinations, but 0:59 finding no device does not establish that no criminal offense occurred. 1:03 Petrol can accelerate burning. 1:05 Its presence alone does not establish an intended fire, a target, or the men's 1:09 purpose. 1:09 No numerical quantity has been disclosed. 1:12 All five men are out of custody, but their movements and contacts remain restricted. 1:17 They were released on September twenty eighth after interviews and inquiries, 1:20 following an extension of the time available for questioning. 1:24 They are British nationals living in London, all in their twenties, and have not 1:28 been publicly named. 1:29 The more detailed age breakdown is three aged twenty four, one twenty three and one 1:33 hundred twenty five. 1:34 That breakdown has not been independently verified, nor has a complete borough by 1:38 borough residence list. 1:40 An unclear fifth location cannot safely be identified by guessing its spelling. 1:44 No criminal charges are established in the available account. 1:47 A description of the men as charged conflicts with the police bail accounts and 1:50 cannot be treated as a verified procedural fact. 1:53 Gloucestershire Police initially arrested them near Welford outside RAF Fairford in 1:57 the early hours of September twenty seventh on suspicion of Explosives Act offences. 2:02 They were subsequently arrested on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act under 2:05 Section five of the Terrorism Act. 2:07 Those are arrest suspicions, not charges or findings of guilt. 2:10 The widely cited 14 days was a legal maximum for detention without charge, not their 2:15 actual time in custody. 2:16 Release on bail is neither an acquittal nor the end of the inquiry. 2:19 The complete bail conditions and next bail dates are not established. 2:23 The release date remains September 28th. 2:26 A police update delivered on September 29th referred to release the previous day. 2:30 Its later publication does not move that release to September 29th. 2:34 One of the arrested men is now understood to have made the first emergency call 2:38 himself. 2:39 The initial chronology placed a public report at about 12.45 in the morning on 2:43 September 27th concerning three suspicious vehicles apparently traveling towards RAF 2:48 Fairford. 2:48 The newer account describes that man's call almost an hour before a female farmer's 2:52 alert. 2:52 His precise words and reason for calling remain unknown, and his identification as 2:57 the caller is not a publicly quoted police confirmation. 3:00 Two calls help explain the difference between the official 1245 timing and the 3:04 farmer's recollection of calling just after 1.30. 3:07 They do not establish coordination or intent. 3:09 The farmer's alert concerned three white vans blocking a road and her driveway with 3:13 hooded or masked men nearby. 3:15 Her account included an unanswered attempt to contact the Ministry of Defense Police 3:19 before calling 999. 3:20 Her belief that she had foiled plans by pure luck does not establish what those 3:24 plans were. 3:25 Another account placed her call around 1245, but that should not erase the newer 3:29 distinction between two alerts. 3:31 Armed officers were described as making arrests within about an hour of a report. 3:35 An exact arrest time is not established. 3:38 The response drew on a range of information, including a public report, without a 3:43 complete intelligence chronology being made public. 3:45 Army explosive ordnance specialists and remote-controlled vehicles examined the vans 3:50 during a declared major incident. 3:51 Armed officers and road blocks restricted access. 3:54 The cordon's reported extent was about 400 meters, not a verified radius. 3:59 A separate account placed the arrests about 400 meters from the base. 4:02 Those descriptions are not interchangeable measurements. 4:05 The evacuation accounts differ by 40 homes or households. 4:08 and that difference has not been reconciled. 4:10 Several accounts put the number advised to evacuate at approximately 85, another 4:15 gave 45 homes. 4:16 Neither figure counts individual people. 4:18 Welford was described as a community of about 200 residents and almost totally 4:22 evacuated, an approximate description rather than a household census. 4:26 Evacuees went to Serencester Leisure Center, and nearly 30 people reportedly spent 4:31 Sunday night in a hotel. 4:33 Residents were permitted to return after Army checks determined the vehicles and 4:37 surrounding area were safe. 4:39 That September 28th safety announcement answers the earlier uncertainty about 4:43 permission to go home. 4:44 It does not establish that every household actually returned or that every 4:47 investigative cordon closed. 4:49 London property searches were complete by the September 29th update. 4:53 The remaining scenes near Fairford were being reduced, with closure expected the 4:57 following day, September 30th. 4:59 Completion of that expectation is not confirmed. 5:01 Local safety, completed searches, release from custody, and closure of investigative 5:06 scenes are separate developments. 5:07 None means the criminal inquiry is over. 5:09 Roth Fairford hosts American forces and has been used for U.S. 5:13 bomber missions and strikes against Iran. 5:15 That role explains the scrutiny of possible foreign involvement, but does not prove 5:19 the base was the intended target or that its military use motivated these men. 5:23 The area is broadly 80 to 90 miles west of London. 5:26 Not an exact incident site measurement. 5:29 Security increased after the arrests. 5:31 An early account put the base at Delta, described there as the highest alert level. 5:36 Its current alert level is not established. 5:38 American citizens in Britain were urged to exercise caution and attend to personal 5:43 security. 5:44 No attack inside the base, resulting injuries or disruption of aircraft operations 5:48 is established. 5:49 The government now believes Iran played a part. 5:51 That September 30 assessment is more explicit than the earlier refusal to draw a 5:55 direct Iranian connection. 5:57 It comes with a promise of more detail in due course, but no disclosed supporting 6:01 evidence. 6:01 The public position has changed. 6:03 The public evidentiary picture has not caught up. 6:06 Who allegedly directed whom, what conduct is attributed to Iran, and whether the men 6:09 knew of any foreign involvement remain unestablished. 6:12 Investigators have considered whether people could have acted for a foreign state 6:15 knowingly or unknowingly. 6:17 An Iran-linked motive was described early on as the leading possibility, with a 6:22 possible Russian operation also under examination. 6:25 Those were lines of inquiry, not established responsibility. 6:28 Counterterrorism policing continues to pursue multiple possibilities, including why 6:33 the men were there, what the petrol was for, whether any preparations constituted an 6:37 offense, and whether other people were involved. 6:40 Claims of planned big damage and long-standing American surveillance remain 6:44 unverified. 6:45 Praise for British-American cooperation does not establish a workable attack or a 6:49 documented surveillance history. 6:51 Even the description of the alleged target varied between our fort and a U.S. 6:54 port. 6:55 Neither is a British investigative finding. 6:58 A local emergency call does not logically exclude earlier intelligence activity. 7:03 The newly described call by a suspect complicates the public chronology, but still 7:07 does not verify what intelligence existed beforehand. 7:10 A separate American foreign actor allegation, made in a September 28th interview and 7:15 published the next day, came without supporting evidence or further details. 7:19 Its longer exact wording is unsettled, with accounts differing between the hand and 7:24 the hands of a foreign actor. 7:25 Iran categorically denies involvement. 7:28 Its London embassy condemned the speculation as unfounded and malicious, warned that 7:32 it could fuel Iranophobia, and reserve the right to take legal measures to safeguard 7:36 its rights and interests. 7:38 That denial does not resolve the inquiry, just as the government's assessment does 7:42 not publicly substantiate responsibility. 7:44 The vehicle question now has a clear answer. 7:47 No improvised explosive devices were found, and petrol was recovered. 7:51 The questions about purpose and foreign direction remain open. 7:54 Residents had permission to return, but every household's return and complete scene 7:58 closure are unverified. 8:00 The first caller's reported identity helps explain two different call times, not the 8:04 men's intentions. 8:05 No specific intended attack or criminal charge is established. 8:09 Five unnamed men remain under investigation on conditional police bail.
Siapa melaporkan apa Di mana keterangan bertentangan Menurut BBC News 27 Sep, 0.00 UTC The five men remained in custody. Menurut BBC News 27 Sep, 8.51 UTC The provided reports do not establish the exact number of people arrested. Menurut DW News 27 Sep, 15.34 UTC The five men remained in custody at the time of the report. Menurut CBC News 27 Sep, 18.56 UTC Police were said to have up to two weeks to hold the suspects before they must release them or potentially charge them. Menurut Sky News 27 Sep, 20.35 UTC The five men remained in custody at the time of the report. Menurut Bloomberg Television 28 Sep, 0.00 UTC Five men were arrested in the U.K. in connection with an investigation involving the Explosives Act and on suspicion of terrorism-related offenses. Menurut MS NOW 28 Sep, 0.00 UTC Authorities had not released information about the suspects' nationalities. Menurut ABC News 28 Sep, 10.32 UTC Police arrested five men on suspicion of terrorism and explosives offenses. Menurut The Guardian 28 Sep, 11.56 UTC Police said a custody extension had been secured until later on Monday. Menurut Fox News 28 Sep, 12.15 UTC Five men were arrested near RAF Fairford on suspicion of explosives and terrorism offences. Menurut FRANCE 24 English 28 Sep, 16.47 UTC Counterterrorism police were questioning the five suspects. Menurut NPR 29 Sep, 11.36 UTC Five British men detained near a military base have been released on bail. Menurut NBC News 30 Sep, 22.57 UTC Several men were initially arrested in connection with the incident and later released. Menurut BBC News 27 Sep, 0.00 UTC The five men were further arrested on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act. Menurut Sky News 27 Sep, 14.06 UTC The five men were subsequently further arrested on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act. Menurut FRANCE 24 English 27 Sep, 14.55 UTC The five were also arrested under Section 5 of the Terrorism Act on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act. Menurut DW News 27 Sep, 15.34 UTC The five men were subsequently arrested on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act. Menurut CBC News 27 Sep, 18.56 UTC The men are under investigation for offences involving explosives and preparation of a terrorist attack. Menurut NBC News 27 Sep, 23.12 UTC UK police said five men were arrested on suspicion of preparing an act of terror and explosives crimes. Menurut ABC News 28 Sep, 2.00 UTC British police arrested five men on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act after a member of the public reported suspicious vehicles headed toward RAF Fairford. Menurut The Guardian 28 Sep, 6.11 UTC The five men were later arrested on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act under section 5 of the Terrorism Act. Menurut Fox News 28 Sep, 12.15 UTC Police obtained an extension to question the five men. Poin yang dilaporkan lebih dari satu media ≠ Police arrested five men on suspicion of terrorism and explosives offenses. Keterangan bertentangan · 13 media ≠ Men further arrested on terrorism suspicion Keterangan bertentangan · 9 media ✓ Men arrested on explosives-related suspicion Dikonfirmasi secara independen · 15 media Arrests linked to an alleged terrorist plot 15 media ✓ Major incident declared near RAF Fairford Dikonfirmasi secara independen · 14 media ✓ Investigators' view of materials in the vans Dikonfirmasi secara independen · 13 media Poin yang hanya dilaporkan satu media1 Hanya dilaporkan oleh Sky News US bomber operations from the continental United States 4 Okt, 23.18 UTC Setiap baris adalah klaim sebagaimana kami catat dari laporan media tersebut. Dibandingkan per 13 Oktober 2026 pukul 21.27 UTC .
