사법 · Andrew warrants challengeEx-Prince Andrew Takes Police to High Court Over Warrants That Searched His Homes작성 2026년 10월 6일 오후 8:29 UTC시청방송 전문0:09Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is challenging in court the warrants police used to0:13search his homes.0:14He was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, and he has been neither0:19charged nor cleared.0:20If he wins, materials seized in the searches could become inadmissible, though0:25police could appeal.0:26So what does Thursday's hearing actually decide?0:29And what is still unknown?0:30An old Bailey judge issued the warrants on 18th of February.0:33He was arrested the next day, his 66th birthday, questioned under caution for 110:38hours, then released under investigation.0:40Nearly eight months later, his claim to quash those warrants is before the High0:43Court.0:44Detectives searched two homes.0:45His residence on the Sandringham estate, also reported as Marsh Farm and Royal Lodge0:50in Windsor.0:51The allegation is that as UK trade envoy, he shared sensitive information with0:55Jeffrey Epstein.0:56He has always denied wrongdoing.0:58The force that arrested him is the other side of this case.1:01Its investigation continues, and it is also asking the court to restrict access to1:05certain documents, arguing that release could affect that investigation.1:09The accounts differ, Thursday or around the ninth, the judicial review, or the1:14release of documents.1:16The better supported reading is one Thursday hearing on document restrictions.1:20That is an inference, not a confirmed fact.1:23At 2 p.m.1:24Thursday, mister Justice Nicholas Hilliard, who did not issue the warrants, hears1:28the application on document restrictions, in private, at least at the start.1:33It is not the full review.1:35Media may be heard if restrictions are contemplated.1:37Whether Andrew attends is unknown.1:40No court has found the warrants unlawful.1:42A judge granted permission for the review earlier this year, which means only that1:45the claim is arguable.1:47His legal team say the warrants were not lawful, but the grounds are not public and1:51no statement from his lawyers has been published.1:53Nobody has named who is paying for a high court challenge.1:56Buckingham Palace says none of it comes from the king's allocation to Andrew and2:00that the king has no role in the legal strategy.2:02Taxpayer funding is not involved.2:05Thursday addresses only the police application to restrict court documents.2:09It is fairly unusual for the subject of an investigation to challenge its handling2:13and his arrest.2:14Still unknown, the legal grounds, the funder when the full review is heard, and2:18whether the investigation ends in a charge or no further action.기사 읽기스토리 타임라인HeyDex짧은 영상 ↗누가 무엇을 보도했나둘 이상의 매체가 보도한 항목Andrew’s arrest on suspicion of misconduct언론사 8곳✓High Court ruling on the warrants’ legality독립적으로 확인됨 · 언론사 7곳✓Police effort to retain seized material독립적으로 확인됨 · 언론사 6곳Allegations involving information shared with Epstein언론사 6곳Properties searched on the day of arrest언론사 6곳Andrew’s legal challenge to the searches언론사 5곳✓Whether the police investigation is ongoing독립적으로 확인됨 · 언론사 5곳✓Effect of quashing warrants on investigation독립적으로 확인됨 · 언론사 4곳Judge’s finding of significant warrant error언론사 3곳Scheduled High Court hearing언론사 3곳Date the properties were searched언론사 3곳Possible effect on use of evidence언론사 3곳Legal action against police over arrest언론사 2곳Police agreement with the court’s ruling언론사 2곳Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has begun legal proceedings against Thames Valley Police.언론사 2곳Warrants quashed for two properties언론사 2곳Police statement on proceedings and investigation언론사 2곳Legal provision required for the warrants언론사 2곳Agreement that the warrants were unlawful언론사 2곳Custody of material during the legal challenge언론사 2곳Uncertainty over return or retention of seized material언론사 2곳한 매체만 보도한 항목3BBC News만 보도Police acceptance of the warrant error10월 8일 오후 2:13 UTCTiming of the warrants being quashed10월 8일 오후 5:00 UTCITV News만 보도Andrew’s legal team’s view of the warrants10월 5일 오후 6:07 UTC각 줄은 해당 매체의 보도에서 저희가 기록한 주장입니다. 2026년 10월 9일 오후 8:12 UTC 기준 비교.
