Aktualizacja 1 z 1NajnowszeDzień 4
Tokyo Court Protects Voices—but Leaves Tsuda’s AI-Cloning Claim Undecided
Kenjiro Tsuda’s removal demand was dismissed because the videos were already gone. The consequential ruling recognizes voice publicity rights—not proven infringement by the alleged AI imitations.
Co wiedzieliśmy na początku
- Kenjiro Tsuda’s demand to have alleged AI imitations of his voice removed from TikTok was dismissed. Yet the case produced an important recognition for performers: their voices, not just their faces, can qualify for protection under publicity rights. The apparent contradiction has a straightforward explanation. The videos and account were already gone, and the Tokyo District Court did not decide whether those particular videos infringed his rights.
