Transcrição 0:07 President Trump ordered a federal lawsuit targeting certification of Alaska's Senate 0:11 election. 0:12 The Justice Department wants a judge to stop the state from making its Senate result 0:15 official under specific conditions. 0:17 Early voting is already underway. 0:19 The court must decide whether federal law allows that intervention and how 0:22 investigators could determine whom voters meant to choose. 0:25 Alaskans vote on November3. 0:27 The department sued less than two weeks before Election Day, months after state 0:31 courts allowed the disputed candidate onto the ballot. 0:33 The earlier Superior Court proceedings took place in Anchorage. 0:36 The United States brought the federal case against Alaska and election official 0:40 Carol Beecher, among other defendants. 0:42 Its request turns on votes for two different people with similar names. 0:46 Dan S. 0:47 Sullivan would have to lose. 0:48 Then a hypothetical reassignment of Daniel J. 0:50 Sullivan, Jr. 0:52 Votes would have to make the incumbent the winner underranked. 0:54 Choice voting. 0:55 The department wants certification stopped while investigators examine voter intent. 0:59 That hypothetical calculation could show that different votes would produce a 1:03 different winner. 1:04 It wouldn't show that voters made mistakes. 1:06 Investigators would still need a reliable way to distinguish someone deliberately 1:09 choosing Daniel from someone intending to choose the senator. 1:12 Voters are choosing a United States Senator. 1:14 Mary Peltola, a former congresswoman, is the Democratic challenger. 1:18 Daniel J. 1:19 Sullivan, Jr. 1:20 is a separate candidate, a60, nine-year old retired teacher and volunteer 1:24 firefighter. 1:25 The incumbent Dan S. 1:26 Sullivan is the Republican senator. 1:28 Daniel denies trying to mislead his supporters and denies being a Democratic plant. 1:32 The general election field also includes Gerald L. 1:35 Hykes. 1:36 The ballot gives voters more than matching surnames. 1:39 It prints Daniel's fuller name and junior designation. 1:41 Beside Dan S. 1:42 Sullivan, it prints registered Republican and Incumbent. 1:46 Daniel's entry carries no party label. 1:48 The official Yuppie sample also distinguishes the names. 1:51 Alaska first used ranked choice voting in2022. 1:54 This sample offers first through fifth choices for four printed candidates and a 1:58 right in row. 1:59 A lower preference can count when a higher-ranked candidate is eliminated. 2:02 Voters' rankings determine that next choice. 2:05 Election officials remove Daniel in June on a frivolous candidacy rationale. 2:09 Judge Thomas A. 2:10 Matthews ordered him included on June twenty-sixth. 2:13 The state pursued an expedited appeal, and Alaska's Supreme Court heard argument and 2:18 issued an order on June29 . 2:20 Daniel retained ballot access. 2:22 The challenge followed two eligibility complaints filed on behalf of Alaska 2:25 Republican Party Chair Carmela Warfield. 2:27 Officials notified Daniel on June10 and issued their final determination five days 2:31 later. 2:32 By August, he was competing in the primary. 2:34 Paltola received eighty two two hundred forty four votes or forty-nine point five 2:38 four percent. 2:39 The incumbent received sixty-eight seven hundred twenty-six or forty one point four 2:43 zero percent. 2:44 Daniel finished third with four one hundred and seven votes or two point four seven 2:48 percent. 2:48 Those August primary results explain the political sensitivity surrounding his 2:52 candidacy. 2:52 The Senate primary recorded one hundred and sixty six four votes. 2:56 Those totals don't tell us how November voters will rank candidates or whether 2:59 anyone will confuse the names. 3:01 The general election contest is rated a toss, up. 3:04 Trump took responsibility for initiating the federal case. 3:07 He said, I am the one that said do it. 3:09 His administration is seeking a certification barrier that would operate if the 3:12 Republican incumbent loses under the specified conditions. 3:15 Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward described the purpose as protecting the 3:19 election's integrity. 3:20 The complaint alleges Daniel deliberately entered to confuse the senator's 3:23 supporters and benefit Peltola. 3:25 Daniel denies that purpose. 3:27 Claims that he coordinated with her remain unproved. 3:29 Daniel's campaign reportedly had one dollar nine hundred and one point five one on 3:33 hand the preceding week. 3:35 A primary period account put his donor count at twelve. 3:37 Those snapshots don't tell us why donors contributed or support assigning his voters 3:41 to the incumbent. 3:42 The filing day is disputed between October twenty, two and October twenty-three. 3:47 The complaint copy bears October twenty two. 3:49 Either way, the department brought its case after early voting began and after the 3:53 candidate's ballot access had been settled for months. 3:56 Peltola's campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee asked to enter 3:59 the case as defendants on October twenty-three. 4:02 They want to defeat the department's action. 4:04 Their objection is that assuming Daniel's votes belong to the incumbent disregards 4:08 voters' choices and their rankings. 4:09 The Justice Department invokes the National Voter Registration Act. 4:13 The legal challenge is whether an enforceable provision actually authorizes this 4:17 lawsuit and the certification restriction it seeks. 4:19 A law's broad purpose of protecting elections doesn't resolve those questions. 4:23 Election. 4:24 Law professor Derek Muller points to the department's reliance on the Act's 4:27 preamble. 4:27 Its opening statement of purpose. 4:29 Former Justice Department official Justin Levitt argues the government lacks a 4:33 statutory right to bring this action. 4:34 Both say the claim should fail. 4:36 Jessica Levinson finds no precedent for this kind of prospective presidentially 4:40 directed action. 4:42 David Becker says the ballot issue belongs under state law and was already 4:45 litigated. 4:46 Richard Pildis calls the case exceptionally weak. 4:48 Those are legal assessments awaiting a judge's decision. 4:51 The timing could also matter. 4:53 The court could dismiss the case, consider it premature, or wait for actual results. 4:57 The ballot dispute was known long before the department sought federal intervention. 5:01 Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the case on October twenty five and denied it 5:05 lays groundwork for overturning an election. 5:07 Sullivan says he'll let it run its course. 5:10 Peltola calls the action a desperate attempt to cling to power and has called the 5:13 proposed challenge corruption. 5:15 Blanche described the action as concerning Alaska rather than a broader plan. 5:19 His earlier remarks left open future federal intervention over certification, 5:23 including what he called hypothetical doomsday scenario. 5:26 The department hasn't obtained an order stopping certification. 5:29 As of October twenty-five, the court hadn't set a hearing. 5:33 Federal authority and a reliable way to determine voter intent are still unresolved. 5:37 November three is election day. 5:39 Counting and litigation can continue afterward.
Quem noticiou o quê Onde as versões divergem NBC News diz 23/10, 16:57 UTC Justin Levitt said there is no law that allows DOJ to challenge ballots or delay certification. The Guardian diz 23/10, 19:46 UTC Derek Mueller said the legal claim was so weak that it had essentially no likelihood of success. PBS NewsHour diz 23/10, 22:17 UTC David Becker said the dispute is a matter of state law and that the Justice Department has no authority or role in it. CBS News diz 23/10, 23:54 UTC Jessica Levinson said the Justice Department must identify a specific provision of federal law to enforce, rather than relying on a law’s general objective. MS NOW diz 24/10, 1:33 UTC The transcript says some experts question whether the statute cited by the Justice Department authorizes blocking certification. FRANCE 24 English diz 24/10, 11:42 UTC The report says the federal government has no authority to direct Alaska’s certification of its election results. ABC News diz 26/10, 14:34 UTC The transcript says neither Blanch nor Trump cited a law they believed would be broken. The Independent diz 1/11, 18:30 UTC Judge Gleason wrote that the relief requested by the federal government was infeasible because many ballots had already been cast and commingled, making voter identities indeterminable. The Seattle Times — Local diz 23/10, 15:00 UTC Derek Muller said the lawsuit will likely matter only if Republicans narrowly lose the Alaska Senate race. CBS News diz 23/10, 23:54 UTC Jessica Levinson said the Justice Department faces a serious uphill battle in the case. The Guardian diz 25/10, 16:48 UTC Derek Mueller said the legal claim was extremely weak and had essentially no likelihood of success. CNN diz 26/10, 22:00 UTC Ben Ginsberg said the lawsuit appeared politically motivated and that its proponents did not have much of a case. Pontos noticiados por mais de um órgão de comunicação ≠ Judge rules federal government lacks authority to bring the lawsuit Versões em conflito · 8 órgãos ≠ Legal assessments of the lawsuit's merits Versões em conflito · 4 órgãos ✓ Lawsuit seeks to block certification under specified outcomes Confirmado de forma independente · 15 órgãos ✓ Lawsuit seeks investigation into voter intent for Daniel Sullivan ballots Confirmado de forma independente · 14 órgãos ✓ DOJ accelerates a criminal probe into alleged voter confusion Confirmado de forma independente · 13 órgãos ✓ Alaska officials announce an investigation into campaign allegations Confirmado de forma independente · 12 órgãos Trump says he directed the lawsuit 12 órgãos The Justice Department filed a revised version of its lawsuit seeking potentially to block certific… 2 órgãos Cada linha é a afirmação tal como a registámos da reportagem desse órgão. Comparado a 6 de novembro de 2026 às 16:06 UTC .
