Siyaset · India voting rightsIndia protest leaders get five days’ custody as Supreme Court hearing shiftsYazıldı 15 Ekim 2026 03:55 UTCİzleYayın dökümü0:07On October 12th, we reported protest protections.0:10Now two leaders face five days' custody.0:13India's confrontation reaches both access to the ballot and the freedom to0:16demonstrate.0:17The unresolved question is whether the court's protections give protesters usable0:21access while the electoral dispute continues.0:23Police removed Jantar Mantar's designation as a rally venue on October 12th.0:28Protesters entered the following day, and police detained 14 people.0:32Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka received their custody orders on October 14th, with0:36Tihar Jail named as their destination.0:39The entry and detentions happened on October 13th.0:42The earlier October 12th date needs correcting.0:45The group included three cockroach Janta Party leaders, Das, Ranka, and Ajinkya0:51Shinde, alongside 11 volunteers.0:54Police allege they climbed gates or barricades and entered without permission.0:58A special executive magistrate at Mandir Marg Police Station ordered Das and Ranka1:02held for five days.1:04The stated concern was that release could lead to further violations and instigation1:08of others.1:09The proceedings concern preventive detention and anticipated conduct.1:12Shinde's status is disputed.1:15He's been described both as jailed and as placed under a peace bond.1:18His conditions and whereabouts haven't been explained.1:21Das and Ranka haven't been reported released, and the five-day description doesn't1:25give a confirmed release date.1:27Das and Ranka had already been released on October 11th alongside Abhijit Dipke.1:32That earlier proceeding took place before a magistrate at Delhi cantonment.1:36Shinde is the third leader named in the new incident.1:39Dipke was the third in the earlier one.1:41Police described the earlier release conditions as a 50,000 rupee surety and one1:46year of peace and good behavior.1:48Dipke denied signing and undertaking not to protest.1:51His denial leaves the separate police account of a peace bond unresolved.1:54Opposition supporters marched toward the Supreme Court on October 12th, demanding a1:59halt to the voter roll revision.2:01Crowd estimates range from hundreds in the central Delhi procession to thousands2:05marching toward the court.2:06There's no common counting boundary that reconciles them.2:09Protesters want Chief Election Commissioner Gianesh Kumar to resign.2:13Rahul Gandhi described the campaign as a defense of the Constitution.2:16While Congress called it a fight against vote theft, opposition leaders sought to2:20put alleged electoral irregularities before the court.2:24Congress says Chief Justice Surya Kant declined its request for a meeting and2:27directed the delegation toward judicial proceedings.2:30The electoral allegations await judicial consideration.2:33The court proceedings examining protest restrictions concern a separate issue.2:38The Supreme Court's october eleventh directions protected lawful movement and2:42peaceful, unarmed assembly outside restricted areas.2:45They required normal metro and rail operations, subject to lawful public order2:50needs, and internet services operating in accordance with law.2:53The court also ordered authorities to prevent illegal detention, review barricades,2:58and protect journalists and lawyers doing their jobs.3:01Those protections leave room for lawful restrictions.3:04Judges still have to examine whether particular measures cross the line.3:07Authorities closed six metro stations before Monday's March and announced traffic3:12restrictions or diversions at 20 locations.3:15Police also announced three alternative rally sites after removing Jantar Mantar's3:20designation.3:21Whether those alternatives offer protesters usable access still needs explaining.3:25The six station closures were a fresh October 12th restriction.3:29Over the preceding weekend, entry and exit restrictions had affected 45 of the3:34metro's 303 stations for about 25 hours.3:37Those stations reopened late on October 10th before Sunday's court hearing.3:41Weekend detention estimates ranged from around 2,000 to more than 7,000, without a3:46reconciled roster.3:47More than 20,000 police personnel were deployed in central Delhi.3:51That deployment figure counts officers.3:54It can't resolve how many protesters were detained.3:56The government said most detainees had been released by about six that Saturday4:00evening, that left the status of others unclear.4:03The separate claim of 45 detention centers remains unconfirmed.4:06The established 45 location figure concerns affected metro stations.4:10A separate mobile internet restriction was scheduled within 4 kilometers of the4:14Janpath-Cartavia path crossing.4:16It ran from 10 at night on October 9th until the same time on October 10th.4:20Its actual reach was disputed.4:22The scheduled internet restriction and the district's assembly restrictions covered4:26different things.4:27There's no measured larger internet footprint or confirmed fresh blackout after4:32Sunday's directions.4:33Developer Rahul Kumar estimated that more than 200 protesters used a Bluetooth mesh4:38messaging app.4:39That app passes messages between nearby devices.4:41Kumar's user estimate hasn't been independently measured and it doesn't show that4:45the app maintained communications throughout the restricted area.4:49Protesters' practical ability to communicate remains part of the access dispute.4:53The youth movement had mobilized by July over education, entrance examination leaks4:57and corruption.4:58Its demands broadened to electoral reform.5:01Organizers have sustained repeated demonstrations and say they'll continue until the5:05election chief resigns.5:06Researcher Arushi Svasta estimated more than 450 demonstrations across 26 states5:12and union territories since September 23rd.5:15That estimate and her description of the protests as peaceful are disputed.5:20It isn't a settled national protest count.5:22Across 31 states and union territories, the draft roll tally reaches 133.9 million5:27names.5:28Claims and appeals can change those roles.5:30How many eligible people ultimately lost their place on the final register remains5:34unknown.5:35Earlier descriptions of 130 million people removed from the register overstated what5:39that number tells us.5:41It counts draft stage omissions across different revision dates.5:44It also remains unclear whether the total counts each person only once.5:47The tally concerns registration entries before voting.5:50Bihar's draft record dates to August 1st, 2025.5:53It lists 78.9 million electors before revision and 6,559,6265:59draft stage removals.6:00October 14th is the National Compilations Report date.6:03The states didn't all publish their drafts together.6:06Among entries classified by reason, 71.5% were marked shifted, absent or other.6:12Another 20.9% were marked dead, and 7.6% enrolled more than once.6:16Those are administrative labels.6:18Their accuracy hasn't been checked person by person.6:21Those percentages cover reason-classified entries rather than necessarily the entire6:25national tally.6:27The same compilation estimates that roles previously covered 98.3% of adults in 196:32states with population projections.6:33That broad coverage estimate can't decide any individual's eligibility.6:37Booth-level officers visit households and collect enumeration forms.6:41Return forms feed the draft role, while names tied to unreturned forms are left off6:46it.6:46Voters can seek inclusion through Form 6.6:49Form 7 is used for objections.6:51The Election Commission and Narendra Modi's BJP deny manipulation.6:55They say revision removes duplicate and ineligible names, and wrongly deleted voters7:00can re-enroll.7:01Opposition parties allege eligible voters, especially Muslims and other minorities,7:05are being removed to benefit the BJP.7:08The number of eligible people wrongly excluded and a reliable demographic breakdown7:12remain unresolved.7:13A special inclusion drive was described by October 2nd.7:16By October 7th, it covered 20 states where revision was complete, using ordinary7:20Form 6 without the extra revision declaration.7:23The earlier Phase 2 exercise recorded about 72 million gross deletions and more than7:2820 million inclusions.7:30Together, those changes produced a net reduction of about 52 million.7:34Some inclusions may have been new enrollments, so they can't all be counted as7:38restorations.7:39That phase began on October 27th, 2025, across nine states and three union7:44territories with roughly 510 million electors.7:47Its net reduction was 10.2%.7:49Those figures describe a different stage and geography from October's national draft7:53tally.7:54Uttar Pradesh's Phase II net reduction was 20.4 million.7:58A narrower category, removals following Form 7 objections and adjudication, totaled8:036,316,000 across the phase.8:06West Bengal accounted for 3,315,000 of those removals.8:11Adding those measures to the national draft tally would mix different populations8:14and stages.8:15The inclusion drive offers a way back onto the rolls, but nobody has supplied a8:19completed total showing how many eligible voters recovered access in time to vote.8:23Inside the Election Commission, two commissioners recorded concerns 14 times over 108:28months.8:28The Commission called those notes suggestions and said its decisions were unanimous.8:33Recorded disagreement during deliberations can coexist with a formally unanimous8:37final decision.8:38Sukhbir, Singh Sandhu, and Vivek Joshi raised the concerns.8:42The Commission initially didn't dispute the notes' existence, dates, or contents.8:46It later repeated that revision decisions were unanimous and said proposed digital8:51initiatives would receive further discussion and checks.8:53The Commission still faces questions about who changed Form VI and who filed appeals8:58in West Bengal.8:59It also hasn't explained why the full Commission didn't meet from May to August.9:03Those procedural questions remain separate from proving political direction of9:07individual deletions.9:08Isvasta also cited 2.7 million West Bengal removals and said 90% of challengers were9:13restored after the election.9:15Those claims remain disputed, with the relevant dates and population unclear.9:19The separate Form 7 total measures a specifically defined removal category.9:24For Uttar Pradesh ahead of its 2027 election, she cited 8.8 million additions and9:297.1 million online applications.9:32She said information was unavailable for another 1.7 million additions.9:36Those figures are disputed.9:37Online applications alone don't capture every possible route onto the rolls.9:42Khanop Place reopened on October 12th after a weekend security closure.9:46Traders said customers remained scarce.9:49One complained about wasted time and a declining economy.9:52That describes a trader's experience.9:54There's no quantified sales loss attached to it.9:56Members of Montreal's Indian diaspora gathered at Norman Bethune Square in10:01solidarity.10:02They condemned what they called state violence and urged Canada to prioritize human10:07rights in its dealings with India.10:09A Canadian trade mission had been scheduled to begin October 12th.10:13Organizers in Delhi said they would seek a police-approved date for peaceful10:16protest.10:17Their October 12th warning promised another protest call if no date came within 2410:21hours.10:22Police haven't announced an approved date in these developments.10:25Gandhi vowed on October 14th to reclaim Jantar Mantar.10:29The venue's protest designation hasn't been restored.10:32Protesters have judicial protections for lawful assembly, but they're still10:35confronting new closures, the loss of their established rally venue, and renewed10:39detention.10:40Justice v.10:41Mohana's illness delayed the October 13th hearing.10:44Officials received until the evening of October 14th to answer contempt notices,10:48with copies going to petitioners' lawyers.10:50The court hasn't issued a final contempt finding.10:52Its follow-up hearing is scheduled for October 15th.Makaleyi okuHaberin zaman çizelgesiHeyDexKısa video ↗Kim neyi bildirdiBirden fazla yayın organının bildirdiği maddelerAllegations of political manipulation in voter rolls9 yayın organıCalls for the election chief's resignation8 yayın organıMarches to the Supreme Court in Delhi7 yayın organıNames removed in the voter-roll revision6 yayın organıProtesters detained during the Delhi demonstrations6 yayın organıProtest over the voter-list purge6 yayın organıPetition alleging voter-list revision irregularities5 yayın organıRally in Connaught Place4 yayın organıDetention and jailing of protest movement leaders4 yayın organıPolice pushing journalists back from a barricade4 yayın organıJantar Mantar's status as a protest venue3 yayın organıClosure of six Delhi metro stations3 yayın organıSupreme Court hearings on election procedures3 yayın organıProtesters seeking to halt voter-list changes3 yayın organıCourt direction on freedom of movement2 yayın organıMovement leaders entering Jantar Mantar2 yayın organıDetention of Abhijeet Dipke2 yayın organıInternet restrictions around the October 10 protest2 yayın organıYalnızca bir yayın organının bildirdiği maddeler1Yalnızca Bar and Bench bildirdiProtection from illegal detention outside restricted zones11 Eki 8:30 UTCHer satır, o yayın organının haberinden kaydettiğimiz iddiadır. 17 Ekim 2026 19:19 UTC itibarıyla karşılaştırıldı.İlgili haberlerSonraki gelişme·9 Eki 11:53 UTCFour of five Green MPs opposed the Zionism motion. Now Polanski rejects its wording
