未在直播

司法 · 突击武器起诉

蕾哈娜住所枪击案取得进展，10项武器指控升级

伊凡娜·莉赛特·奥尔蒂斯对14项指控的起诉书表示不认罪，其中10项武器指控已升级。受审能力裁决使案件得以继续推进，但两项决定均不能证明其有罪。

播出 文字 阅读需 6 分钟24 个来源

新闻追踪第 2 天

1 篇报道13 家媒体24 个来源3 个视频

  • 暂无标注日期的事件
  1. 第 1 次更新蕾哈娜住所枪击案取得进展，10项武器指控升级当前位置

译自英文原文。

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

针对蕾哈娜洛杉矶住所枪击案的指控于3月公布。近7个月后，检方正推进大陪审团起诉书，使武器指控更加严重：如今有10项指控称使用的是突击武器，而非半自动枪支。2026年9月30日，伊凡娜·莉赛特·奥尔蒂斯在洛杉矶市中心一家法庭宣读14项指控的起诉书后，表示不认罪。变化在于检方必须证明的内容，而非法院认定她实施了枪击。8 3 16

起诉书包括谋杀未遂指控；此前，9月29日的一项裁决认定奥尔蒂斯具备受审能力。这两项进展使案件得以依据修订后的指控继续审理；如果她所有罪名均被判有罪，可能面临终身监禁。两项决定均未判定其有罪。17 14

关键事实

  1. 14起诉书中的重罪指控数量 1016
  2. 10升级为突击武器指控的罪名数量 3
  3. 0据报受伤人数 6

被告是一名佛罗里达州女子，其经独立信息支持的全名为伊凡娜·莉赛特·奥尔蒂斯。地方检察官办公室9月30日的公告称她36岁，NBC洛杉矶台同期发布的文章也如此报道。FOX 11的9月报道及NBC的一些字幕则称她35岁。没有经核实的出生日期或明确更正可以解释这一差异；不应假定这是因为生日所致。4 5 13

武器指控升级带来的变化

据报道，指控细目为1项谋杀未遂、10项袭击罪，以及3项被描述为向有人居住的住宅开枪的罪名。DNYUZ提供了完整细目；现有《洛杉矶时报》报道提及谋杀未遂和10项袭击罪。完整起诉书无法取得，因此3项开枪指控的具体法条以及完整的住宅或车辆措辞仍未得到核实。23 7

NBC新闻报道称，10项武器指控已从半自动枪支指控升级为突击武器指控。Rolling Stone另报道称，一名枪械专家认定该武器符合突击步枪的分类。这是对武器分类的报道，并不意味着使用了另一支枪，也不能证明奥尔蒂斯开过这支枪。3 12

这一区别很重要，因为检方如今依据更为严厉的武器指控框架推进案件。但完整的3月原始指控清单同样无法取得，因此无法逐项比较。现有证据支持确认这10项指控已升级，但不足以还原每一项法定罪名的变更，也不足以计算其对可能刑期的独立影响。3 23 14

家庭与社区面临危险

枪击事件发生于2026年3月8日下午约1:20，地点是蕾哈娜位于比弗利克雷斯特的住所。NBC洛杉矶台明确给出了3月8日和大致时间；年份则依据标注日期的3月10日指控公告及9月的法庭时间线确定。检方称，奥尔蒂斯从佛罗里达州驱车前往洛杉矶，使用一支AR式步枪向该住所及邻近住宅至少开了20枪。5 8 1

据称，危险并不只针对这位歌手本人。NBC新闻报道称，蕾哈娜及其伴侣A$AP Rocky当时与三名子女和一名保姆在住所内。该媒体较详细的报道指出，子女在场时，子弹击中了这对伴侣所住的Airstream拖车以及一面婴儿房墙壁。无人受伤。3 17

现有报道并未对所有人的行动轨迹作出明确还原。NBC较简短的《头条新闻》报道说，这对伴侣和子女当时在拖车里；较详细的报道则分别指出，这对伴侣在拖车内，子女在婴儿房里。这些说法无法确定他们在枪击发生期间的确切位置。婴儿房墙壁遭击中的次数，以及子弹是否穿透墙壁，也都尚未得到证实。2 17

至少20发子弹是关于开枪数量的指控，并非经核实的击中主屋的子弹数量。因此，FOX 11所说有几发子弹击中住宅，不一定与开枪数量更多这一指控相矛盾。在没有完整的击中和损坏清单的情况下，这些是不同的衡量指标，不能简单地互相替换，视为相互竞争的总数。1 18 13

有关邻近住宅的指控也使此案的影响超出对名人住所的袭击。该指控称，有人向住宅区开枪。现有报道并未确认邻近住宅内任何人的身份及相关情况。3

在3月10日最初提出指控时，洛杉矶县地方检察官内森·J·霍赫曼表示：“在任何有人居住的社区开枪都极其危险，会危及生命，并将受到全面起诉。”这番警告属于3月的公告，而非9月起诉书发布时的说法；霍赫曼9月声明的确切措辞未能查明。15

具备受审能力，不等于被定罪

9月29日的受审能力裁决涉及奥尔蒂斯参与诉讼程序的能力。该裁决并未认定她在据称发生枪击时的精神状态，也不是有罪判决或经核实的精神科诊断。裁决的完整理由无法取得。她在9月30日对起诉书作出的答辩，也不同于她此前对3月指控作出的不认罪答辩。17 6 16

美联社报道（由《好莱坞报道》刊载）称，保释金为260万美元。可查阅的官方公告并未独立证实这一金额，现有材料也无法确认是否已交保，或她之后的羁押状态是否发生变化。同一篇美联社报道称，如果她所有罪名均被判有罪，可能面临终身监禁，而不是说法院已经判刑。具体量刑计算、任何最低刑期及假释资格均尚未确定。14 4

本文无法确认经核实的作案动机、详细逮捕经过或对所追回物证的完整说明，也无法核实下一次听证会的日期。起诉书使检方的指控更加具体，受审能力裁决则扫清了一项程序障碍，但支持谋杀未遂指控和修订后武器指控的证据仍须接受检验。案件已有进展；有罪与否仍未裁定。

本报道所依据的消息来源

NBC新闻：《Hallie Jackson NOW》，9月30日。1

NBC新闻：《Tom Llamas主持的Top Story》，9月30日。2

NBC新闻：佛罗里达州女子因涉枪击案被起诉。3

洛杉矶县地方检察官办公室：9月30日起诉公告。4

NBC洛杉矶台：9月30日起诉报道。5

NBC新闻：起诉书及谋杀未遂报道。6

《洛杉矶时报》：9月30日起诉案报道。7

洛杉矶县地方检察官办公室：3月10日最初提出指控的公告。8

Westside Current：对起诉书中的指控表示不认罪。9

PBS新闻／美联社：突击武器指控起诉案报道。10

洛杉矶县：3月10日提出指控的公告。11

Rolling Stone Australia：大陪审团起诉及武器分类报道。12

FOX 11洛杉矶台：受审能力裁决及起诉案报道。13

《好莱坞报道》／美联社：起诉、保释金及可能面临的刑罚。14

洛杉矶县地方检察官办公室：3月提出指控的声明，备用页面。15

MyNewsLA：9月30日提审报道。16

NBC新闻：9月29日受审能力裁决报道。17

NBC洛杉矶台：9月29日受审能力裁决报道。18

ABC11：受审能力裁决报道。19

Patch：不认罪答辩报道。20

Rolling Stone：对升级后的指控作出答辩。21

《洛杉矶时报》：9月29日受审能力裁决报道。22

DNYUZ：据报的起诉罪名数量分类。23

MyNewsLA：9月30日另一篇答辩报道。24

播出原貌 10 行
  1. Bullets struck a nursery wall while Rihanna’s children were there. No one was injured, but the woman accused of the shooting now faces fourteen felony counts, including ten upgraded weapons allegations. A conviction on all counts could carry life imprisonment. What does the upgraded indictment change, and what has the court still not decided?
  2. Ten counts now allege an assault weapon rather than a semiautomatic gun. The fourteen-count grand-jury indictment was unsealed in a downtown Los Angeles courtroom on September 30, 2026. Its charge breakdown includes one attempted-murder count, ten assault counts and three counts described as shooting at an inhabited home. The exact statutory sections and full wording of those three shooting counts remain unverified, including their precise dwelling-or-vehicle formulation. The upgrade changes the alleged legal classification of the weapon; it does not establish that a different gun was used. A firearms expert’s reported classification of the weapon as an assault rifle is not proof that the defendant committed the shooting. A complete line-by-line comparison with the original March charges also remains unverified.
  3. The accused is a Florida woman named Ivanna Lisette Ortiz. The indictment announcement identifies her as thirty-six, but her age remains unresolved between thirty-five and thirty-six. No verified birth date or explanation establishes whether a birthday or an error accounts for the difference. Ortiz pleaded not guilty to the new indictment. The grand jury’s decision permits the prosecution to proceed on revised charges; it is not a verdict.
  4. The allegation begins with a drive from Florida to Los Angeles. Ortiz is accused of making that trip before firing from a Tesla at Rihanna’s Beverly Crest property on March 8, 2026, at about 1:20 p.m. Orlando is an unconfirmed starting point; the departure date, route and vehicle ownership remain unestablished.
  5. At least twenty rounds were allegedly fired from an AR-style rifle at Rihanna’s property and a neighboring home. That minimum describes shots fired, not twenty verified bullet impacts on the main house. A smaller number of impacts on the house would not, by itself, contradict the larger firing allegation. There is no complete shot-by-shot reconstruction or verified inventory of impacts and property damage.
  6. Rihanna and A$AP Rocky were at the property with their three children. Bullets struck an Airstream trailer occupied by the couple and a nursery wall while the children were there. The number of nursery-wall impacts, and whether bullets penetrated that wall, have not been established. Nor is there a definitive reconstruction of each person’s location throughout the shooting. One description places the couple with their children in the trailer; the more detailed description separates the couple in the trailer from the children in the nursery. Those descriptions do not resolve everyone’s precise whereabouts. A nanny’s presence remains uncorroborated. No one was injured.
  7. The neighboring-home allegation extends the case beyond the singer’s property. It concerns danger to other people in a residential neighborhood, although the identities and circumstances of anyone at that neighboring home remain unknown. The initial charging stage was March 10. The warning about neighborhood danger belongs to that stage, not the September indictment announcement; the exact wording of a September statement has not been verified.
  8. A judge found Ortiz mentally competent to stand trial on September 29, one day before the indictment was unsealed. That ruling concerns her ability to participate in the proceedings. It does not establish guilt, determine her mental state at the time of the alleged shooting or supply a verified psychiatric diagnosis. The decision’s full reasoning remains unverified. Her September 30 not-guilty plea is also distinct from her earlier not-guilty plea to the March charges. The competency ruling allows the case to move forward, but it does not settle the attempted-murder or assault-weapon allegations.
  9. Life imprisonment is possible if Ortiz is convicted on all counts, not a sentence already imposed. The precise sentencing calculation, any minimum term and parole eligibility have not been established. Bail is reported at two-point-six million dollars, but that amount lacks independent official confirmation. Whether it was posted, or whether her custody status subsequently changed, remains unknown.
  10. The indictment’s immediate change is a more serious weapons charging framework against a defendant found competent to stand trial. What it does not decide is guilt: the evidence supporting attempted murder and the assault-weapon allegations still has to be tested through the legal process. No verified motive, detailed arrest reconstruction or complete account of recovered physical evidence has been established. No next hearing date has been verified.

来源

24 个来源13 家媒体3 个视频1 篇通稿

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。