災害 · Escalante flood riskEscalante Utah flood warning reached into November 2 after heavy rain播出 2026年11月4日 上午3:46 [UTC]文字 2026年11月4日 上午3:57 [UTC]閱讀文字報導本則新聞逐字稿 · 載入中0:07Heavy rain kept Escalante's rivers and slot canyons running high into the night.0:12On November first, we reported an Escalante Basin warning scheduled through four0:18thirty that afternoon.0:19Later warnings carried the threat into the evening and early the next morning.0:24Drivers, hikers, and campers faced flood risk after dark.0:28How far did that later warning coverage extend?0:31And what does it leave unresolved for travelers?0:34Escalante, hole in the rock road, and nearby slot canyons were named as places that0:40could flood.0:41The late night warning, also named Boulder.0:44Those locations lay within a flood threat area in southern Utah, where recent rain0:49was feeding high flows.0:51The afternoon warning covered central Garfield County and northeastern Kane County.0:56The overnight warning covered south central Garfield and northeastern Cain.1:00Naming those county portions doesn't mean the entire counties faced the same1:04warning.1:05Forecasters described flooding as ongoing.1:08Or about to begin.1:09The morning warning first ran until ten thirty, then four thirty that afternoon.1:14Forecasters moved the deadline to ten thirty that night.1:18A new warning issued three minutes later ran until two thirty the next morning,1:23November second.1:24That three-minute gap separates the evening warning's scheduled end from the1:28overnight warnings issuance.1:30The two warnings establish successive periods of coverage.1:33We can't call those minutes uninterrupted coverage.1:36All those times used mountain standard time and the overnight warning began on1:41November first.1:42The earlier ten thirty in the morning was also an expiration time.1:46The first warning had been issued before dawn, and the four forty-five afternoon1:50deadline in our previous report belonged to a different area, southwestern Garfield1:56and central Kane counties.1:58Forecasters estimated that one and a half to two and a half inches of rain had2:02fallen.2:03Radar and automated gauges indicated heavy rain in the afternoon.2:08Forecasters repeated that same rainfall range late at night.2:12The later warning repeated the estimate without adding a separate accumulation.2:17The range also shouldn't be read as a measurement at every point in the basin.2:22Both warnings allowed for up to another half inch of rain.2:25That was a forecast for the warned area during this episode.2:29Streams, rivers, and slot canyons were carrying high flows from recent rainfall.2:35Forecasters expected further rain to maintain those flows before they receded that2:40put waterways at the center of the danger for people hiking or camping nearby.2:44The safety instructions were direct.2:47Turn around at flooded roads.2:49Use particular caution at night.2:51Hikers and campers should stay away from streams and creeks.2:55The threatened location list identified places that could experience flooding3:00without confirming flooding at every named community, road or canyon.3:04Forecasters reported the river near Escalante.3:07At nearly four hundred cubic feet per second, that's the volume of water moving3:12downstream each second.3:14It doesn't tell a driver how deep water is over a road or whether a crossing is3:18passable.3:19The gauge is the Escalante River Station near Escalante.3:23The late night rain assessment and the river reading shouldn't be assigned the same3:28observation time.3:29The warning gave a time for the radar and rain gauge assessment, but didn't pin down3:34when that river flow was measured.3:36Both scheduled warning deadlines have now passed.3:39Nobody has confirmed here whether a later warning extended coverage, what the3:44subsequent water levels were, or which routes are currently open.3:48The later warnings did carry this episode into early November second.3:52A scheduled warning expiration doesn't inspect a road, a crossing or a canyon, and3:58it doesn't establish that travel became safe.透過 HeyDex 探索透過 RSS 關注誰報導了什麼24 個要點0 個經兩家以上媒體證實22 個僅來自一家媒體0 個存在爭議2 家媒體就此事的報導內容,逐點列出,並標明每一點由誰最先報導。多家媒體報導的要點每一欄是一家媒體,依首次報導的先後排列。選擇一個標記,即可閱讀該媒體的原文。最先報導有報導轉述其他媒體未報導要點National Weather ServiceKUTV媒體數Risk of impassable backcountry roads未經獨立證實2Flood warning expiration time未經獨立證實2僅一家媒體報導的要點僅National Weather Service報導Flooding status in the warned area11月1日 14:58 UTCCounties and areas covered by flood warnings11月1日 14:58 UTCRunoff and rainfall effects on streams11月1日 15:00 UTCParia River flow near US-8911月1日 15:00 UTCWahweap Creek flow near Big Water11月1日 15:00 UTCRainfall amounts reported in the warned area11月1日 17:27 UTCEscalante and Boulder locations at flood risk11月1日 14:58 UTCHole in the Rock Road and slot canyons at flood risk11月1日 17:27 UTCEscalante River flow near Escalante11月1日 14:58 UTCHeavy rain indicated at 10:31 p.m.11月2日 05:33 UTCHeavy rain indicated at 7:56 a.m.11月1日 14:58 UTCPine Creek flow11月1日 14:58 UTCAdditional rainfall possible in warned area11月1日 17:27 UTCAdditional rainfall possible in warned area11月1日 23:12 UTCLate-night flood warning effective period11月2日 05:33 UTCAdvice on flooded roads and nighttime caution11月2日 05:33 UTC僅KUTV報導Southern Utah Flood Watch coverage and duration11月1日 15:09 UTCFlood warnings for three counties11月1日 15:09 UTCExcessive runoff expected from previous storms11月1日 15:09 UTCFlood-prone areas likely to become inundated11月1日 15:09 UTCReported issuance times for the warnings11月1日 15:09 UTCInjuries or property damage reported11月1日 15:09 UTC每一行都是我們從該媒體報導中記錄的說法。比較截至 2026年11月2日 上午6:02 [UTC]。相關報導同一事件11月2日 03:56 UTCRoads wash out in Colorado–Utah flooding; La Plata sheriff closes county roads背景10月22日 23:49 UTCFlood wave forces evacuations in Hurricane, Utah; safe return unresolved