Justiz · Anklage wegen einer AngriffswaffeVerfahren wegen der Schüsse auf Rihannas Haus: Zehn Waffenvorwürfe hochgestuftVerfasst 1. Oktober 2026 um 07:28 UTCAnsehenTranskript0:09Bullets struck a nursery wall while Rihanna's children were there.0:12No one was injured, but the woman accused of the shooting now faces 14 felony0:16counts, including 10 upgraded weapons allegations.0:19A conviction on all counts could carry life imprisonment.0:22What does the upgraded indictment change, and what has the court still not decided?0:2610 counts now allege an assault weapon rather than a semi-automatic gun.0:30The 14-count grand jury indictment was unsealed in a downtown Los Angeles courtroom0:34on September 30th, 2026.0:36Its charge breakdown includes one attempted murder count, 10 assault counts, and0:40three counts described as shooting at an inhabited home.0:43The exact statutory sections and full wording of those three shooting counts remain0:47unverified, including their precise dwelling or vehicle formulation.0:51The upgrade changes the alleged legal classification of the weapon.0:54It does not establish that a different gun was used.0:56A firearms expert's reported classification of the weapon as an assault rifle is not1:01proof that the defendant committed the shooting.1:03A complete line-by-line comparison with the original March charges also remains1:06unverified.1:07The accused is a Florida woman named Ivana Lissette-Ortiz.1:11The indictment announcement identifies her as 36, but her age remains unresolved1:15between 35 and 36.1:17No verified birth date or explanation establishes whether a birthday or an error1:21accounts for the difference.1:22Ortiz pleaded not guilty to the new indictment.1:25The grand jury's decision permits the prosecution to proceed on revised charges.1:29It is not a verdict.1:30The allegation begins with a drive from Florida to Los Angeles.1:33Ortiz is accused of making that trip before firing from a Tesla at Rihanna's Beverly1:38Crest property on March 8th, 2026.1:40At about 1:20 p.m., Orlando is an unconfirmed starting point.1:44The departure date, route, and vehicle ownership remain unestablished.1:55At least 20 rounds were allegedly fired from an AR-style rifle at Rihanna's property2:00and a neighboring home.2:01That minimum describes shots fired, not 20 verified bullet impacts on the main2:05house.2:06A smaller number of impacts on the house would not by itself contradict the larger2:10firing allegation.2:11There is no complete shot-by-shot reconstruction or verified inventory of impacts2:15and property damage.2:16Rihanna and A.P.2:18Rocky were at the property with their three children.2:20Bullets struck an airstream trailer occupied by the couple and a nursery wall while2:24the children were there.2:25The number of nursery wall impacts and whether bullets penetrated that wall have not2:29been established, nor is there a definitive reconstruction of each person's location2:33throughout the shooting.2:34One description places the couple with their children in the trailer.2:37The more detailed description separates the couple in the trailer from the children2:40in the nursery.2:41Those descriptions do not resolve everyone's precise whereabouts.2:44A nanny's presence remains uncorroborated.2:46No one was injured.2:47The neighboring home allegation extends the case beyond the singer's property.2:51It concerns danger to other people in a residential neighborhood, although the2:55identities and circumstances of anyone at that neighboring home remain unknown.2:59The initial charging stage was March 10th.3:01The warning about neighborhood danger belongs to that stage, not the September3:05indictment announcement.3:06The exact wording of a September statement has not been verified.3:09A judge found Ortiz mentally competent to stand trial on September 29th, one day3:14before the indictment was unsealed.3:16That ruling concerns her ability to participate in the proceedings.3:19It does not establish guilt, determine her mental state at the time of the alleged3:23shooting, or supply a verified psychiatric diagnosis.3:26The decision's full reasoning remains unverified.3:29Her September 30th not guilty plea is also distinct from her earlier not guilty plea3:33to the March charges.3:34The competency ruling allows the case to move forward, but it does not settle the3:38attempted murder or assault weapon allegations.3:41Life imprisonment is possible if Ortiz is convicted on all counts, not a sentence3:45already imposed, the precise sentencing calculation, any minimum term, and parole3:50eligibility have not been established.3:51Bail is reported at $2.6 million, but that amount lacks independent official3:56confirmation.3:57Whether it was posted or whether her custody status subsequently changed remains4:01unknown.4:02The indictment's immediate change is a more serious weapons charging framework4:06against a defendant found competent to stand trial.4:08What it does not decide is guilt.4:10The evidence supporting attempted murder and the assault weapon allegations still4:14has to be tested through the legal process.4:16No verified motive, detailed arrest reconstruction, or complete account of recovered4:20physical evidence has been established.4:22No.4:22Next hearing date has been verified.Artikel lesenChronologie der GeschichteHeyDexDas Kurzvideo ↗
