Noticia en desarrollo · 1 reportaje
Missouri congressional map court dispute
En desarrolloPróxima revisión el : A further court ruling or withdrawal of the competing orders resolving whether the map is legally in force for November.
Situación actual
The U.S. Supreme Court denied Missouri’s emergency request to implement the proposed congressional map, while the state’s highest court ruled it never became law. A federal judge in St. Louis then ordered the map used for November, leaving conflicting court orders unresolved as of September 10, 2026.
Seguimiento de la noticiaDía 2
1 informe30 medios39 fuentes1 vídeo
- Aún no hay hechos fechados
La noticia hasta ahora
Misuri tiene dos mapas y una elección: ¿qué tribunal cederá?
El máximo tribunal de Misuri dijo que el mapa republicano de 7-1 nunca se convirtió en ley. El juez Kavanaugh dejó intacto ese fallo; luego un juez federal ordenó usar el mapa de todos modos, dejando una elección con dos mandatos.
Qué avanzó
- El Tribunal Supremo de Misuri dictamina por 7-0 que la HB 1 nunca entró en vigor
- El juez Clark concede una orden de restricción temporal de 14 días que exige usar la HB 1
Pendiente tras este informe
- No hay una respuesta definitiva sobre qué orden prevalece si ambas siguen técnicamente vigentes
Historial
Abierta1 reportaje
Quiénes participan
Personas
Bob OnderAmerican politician and physician (born 1962)1 informe
Brett KavanaughU.S. Supreme Court justice since 2018 (born 1965)1 informe
Catherine HanawayAmerican politician1 informe- Denny HoskinsAmerican politician1 informe
Emanuel CleaverU.S. Representative from Missouri1 informe- Richard Von Glahnprofessor of history1 informe
Stephen R. Clark Sr.American judge1 informe- W. Brent PowellAssociate Justice of the Missouri Supreme Court1 informe
Lugares
- Kansas CityKansas City, MO, USA1 informe
- MissouriMissouri, USA1 informe
- St. LouisSt. Louis, MO, USA1 informe
Todos los medios que leímos sobre esta noticia
39 fuentes30 medios1 vídeo2 textos de agencia
democracydocket.com4
- Federal judge revives Missouri GOP gerrymander right after Supreme Court rejects state’s emergency bid - Democracy Docket
- In big win for voters, Supreme Court won’t revive Missouri gerrymander before midterms - Democracy Docket
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Missouri redistricting fight erupts again as referendum backers ask judge to pause order, appeal to 8th Circuit - Democracy Docket
courtlistener.com2
- Memorandum and Order On August 4, 2026, Missouri concluded its primary elections using the congressional districts laid out in House Bill 1 (“HB 1”). Missouri voters and candidates for federal office in Missouri request that the Court issue a temporary restraining order enjoining the use of any congressional district map other than HB 1, see generally doc. 2. All parties, including Intervenors People Not Politicians and Richard von Glahn, had notice and submitted briefing. Docs. 2, 12, 19–20, 29–30. Having considered the Verified Complaint, the affidavit attached to it, the parties’ and intervenors’ briefs, and applicable law, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order. I. Facts and Background The Court treats the following uncontroverted facts, drawn from Plaintiffs’ verified complaint, docs. 1, 4, as true for the sake of resolving this motion for a TRO. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(A). Only a very narrow set of facts bear on the resolution of Plaintiffs’ request for a TRO. On September 12, 2025, the Missouri General Assembly passed HB 1, replacing the prior congressional district map enacted in 2022. Doc. 1 ¶¶ 15–16; doc. 12-4 at 11 (The Court cites to CONGRESSMAN ROBERT “BOB” ONDER et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF MISSOURI and DENNY HOSKINS, Defendants.
- Emergency Application for Stay(249929152.1)
CBS News1Primero1 vídeo
- Primera información
- Supreme Court rebuffs Missouri's request for new House map favoring Republicans
electionlawblog.org1
Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion |legalinsurrection.com1
NBC Newsnbcnews.com1
Newsweeknewsweek.com1
redistrictingonline.org1
statecourtreport.org1
