Aller au contenu
Maintenant

En coursJour 3

DOJ lawsuit over Alaska Senate certification

  1. Mise à jour 1 sur 1Dernière mise à jourJour 3

    Le ministère de la Justice peut-il bloquer la certification de l’élection sénatoriale en Alaska à cause des votes pour l’autre Sullivan ?

    Trump a ordonné le dépôt d’une plainte visant à interrompre la certification dans un scénario précis où Sullivan serait battu. L’affaire doit encore s’appuyer sur une autorité juridique — et sur un moyen fiable d’établir l’intention des électeurs.

    Regarder

    Première sourceAlaska Story

    Ce que nous savions au départ

    • Le juge de la Cour supérieure Thomas A. Matthews, siégeant à Anchorage, a ordonné que Daniel figure parmi les candidats. L’État a engagé une procédure d’appel accélérée.
    • La Cour suprême de l’Alaska a entendu les arguments et rendu une ordonnance. Daniel a conservé le droit de figurer sur le bulletin.

Qui a rapporté

Qui a rapporté

41 médias · 85 sources · 17 vidéos

27 sur 41 avaient publié à ce moment-là

Qui a rapporté quoi

Là où les versions divergent

NBC News écrit
Justin Levitt said there is no law that allows DOJ to challenge ballots or delay certification.
The Guardian écrit
Derek Mueller said the legal claim was so weak that it had essentially no likelihood of success.
PBS NewsHour écrit
David Becker said the dispute is a matter of state law and that the Justice Department has no authority or role in it.
CBS News écrit
Jessica Levinson said the Justice Department must identify a specific provision of federal law to enforce, rather than relying on a law’s general objective.
MS NOW écrit
The transcript says some experts question whether the statute cited by the Justice Department authorizes blocking certification.
FRANCE 24 English écrit
The report says the federal government has no authority to direct Alaska’s certification of its election results.
ABC News écrit
The transcript says neither Blanch nor Trump cited a law they believed would be broken.
The Independent écrit
Judge Gleason wrote that the relief requested by the federal government was infeasible because many ballots had already been cast and commingled, making voter identities indeterminable.
The Seattle Times — Local écrit
Derek Muller said the lawsuit will likely matter only if Republicans narrowly lose the Alaska Senate race.
CBS News écrit
Jessica Levinson said the Justice Department faces a serious uphill battle in the case.
The Guardian écrit
Derek Mueller said the legal claim was extremely weak and had essentially no likelihood of success.
CNN écrit
Ben Ginsberg said the lawsuit appeared politically motivated and that its proponents did not have much of a case.

Points rapportés par plusieurs médias

Chaque ligne est l’affirmation telle que nous l’avons relevée dans le reportage de ce média. Comparaison au .

Qui est concerné

Qui est concerné

Personnes

  • Dan SullivanUnited States Senator from Alaska
  • Donald TrumpPresident of the United States (2017–2021; since 2025)
  • Mary PeltolaAmerican politician (born 1973)

Organisations

  • Alaska Supreme Courtthe highest court in the U.S. state of Alaska
  • Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeDemocratic Party Hill committee for the US Senate
  • United States Department of JusticeUnited States federal executive department

Lieux

  • Alaska
  • Anchorage