Justitie · RMV bribery caseQuincy RMV bribery: Two charged over paid priority and bypassed title requirementsGeschreven 29 oktober 2026 om 09:42 UTCKijkenTranscript0:07Two people face bribery charges over paid priority at the Quincy RMV.0:11Prosecutors say customers paid a public employee for overnight title processing0:15while ordinary customers faced pandemic delays.0:17They also allege paying customers could bypass paperwork requirements and a required0:21salvage inspection.0:22The case now turns on whether private payments bought both faster service and a way0:26around vehicle, title safeguards.0:28Ashley Jordan, twenty-nine, of Bridgewater, worked as a title clerk at the Registry0:33of Motor Vehicles headquarters in Quincy.0:35Stanley Nazir, forty-seven of Somerville, is accused of bringing her customers and0:39paying for her services himself.0:40The Massachusetts Attorney General's office announced the case on October0:43twenty-eight, two thousand twenty-six.0:45The two defendants face different charges tied to their alleged roles.0:49Jordan faces one count each of bribery, unwarranted privilege, and conspiracy to0:53commit title fraud.0:54Nazir faces one count each of bribery and solicitation to commit bribery.0:59Prosecutors still have to prove those accusations in court.1:02Jordan's job gave her control over consequential vehicle records.1:05She began working at the RMV in two thousand and nineteen.1:08Her responsibilities included issuing duplicate titles, changing vehicle ownership,1:13amending and correcting titles, and adding liens, which record claims against a1:17vehicle.1:17Those duties put Jordan in a position to change who appeared as a vehicle's owner1:21and what claims appeared on its title.1:23Prosecutors say she used that public access to run an unauthorized private title and1:27registration business.1:28The Quincy building closed to the public during the COVID pandemic.1:32Some processing times grew more than threefold.1:34Prosecutors say Jordan turned those longer waits into an opportunity to sell service1:38ordinary customers couldn't get at the same speed.1:40The more then, threefold increase affected some transactions.1:44Against those delays, prosecutors say Jordan accepted personal payments to move1:48customers ahead of the queue and process their transactions overnight.1:51The alleged fee bought access controlled through her government job.1:55Prosecutors also say Jordan earned more from the alleged scheme than from her RMV1:59salary.2:00They haven't disclosed either amount or the period being compared.2:03The allegation describes a private income stream built around her access to public2:07services.2:08Prosecutors say Jordan accepted improper or incomplete paperwork.2:12They also allege customers could obtain a reconstructed vehicle title without first2:16completing a required salvage inspection.2:18That would let a paying customer bypass a prerequisite for receiving that title.2:22The accusation reaches beyond where a customer stood in line.2:25Prosecutors allege private payments could change both how quickly an application2:29moved and which requirements the customer had to meet.2:31Jordan allegedly promoted her services at a car enthusiast social club while openly2:36wearing her R.M.V.2:37lanyard.2:38Prosecutors describe her marketing the private service alongside a visible sign of2:42her public employment.2:43They haven't named the club.2:44Naser allegedly approached towing companies to promote Jordan's services and2:48personally asked them to pay her for faster titles.2:50Prosecutors also say he paid Jordan private bribes for his own title transactions.2:54His alleged role combined recruiting customers with using the service himself.2:58Assistant Attorneys General Mindy Clanoff and Jesse Coulon handled the matter3:01through the state's white collar and public integrity division.3:04Massachusetts state police assisted.3:06The allegations about payments, paperwork, and inspection shortcuts still have to be3:09proved.3:10Both defendants were arraigned in Norfolk Superior Court on October27,2026.3:15Both were released on personal recognizance, meaning they could leave on a promise3:19to return to court.3:20Their arraignments came one day before the case was publicly announced.3:23Their next court appearance is reportedly December fifteenth.3:26The year and type of hearing still need confirmation.Lees het artikelTijdlijn van het verhaalHeyDex
