46 Years of Minimum Terms for the Irvine Beach Killers of Kayden Moy

Sentencing was handed down at the High Court in Glasgow on 21 July 2026 for Cole Turley, Jay Stewart, and a 15-year-old co-defendant who cannot be named for legal reasons⁠2⁠3⁠5. Turley and Stewart each received life with a minimum of 16 years; the youngest defendant received life with a minimum of 14 years⁠3. The Daily Record, LBC, Glasgow Live and the Daily Record's family coverage describe the combined minimum as 46 years⁠5⁠6⁠9⁠10. For a 15-year-old at the time of the killing, that means the earliest possible release comes in their 29th year⁠3.

Turley had pleaded guilty before trial. Stewart and the 15-year-old were convicted by a jury at the High Court in June 2026⁠11⁠3. Reporting on Stewart's age at sentencing is split: the BBC and STV give 18⁠2⁠3⁠11, while the Herald, Irvine Times, Daily Record and LBC give 19⁠4⁠5⁠6⁠8. The court papers do not resolve that gap in the public record.

Kayden Moy was 16 years old when, on 17 May 2025, he was attacked with a knife on Irvine Beach in North Ayrshire⁠2⁠3⁠4. He was unarmed. As he tried to run, he slipped and fell, and the attackers stabbed him to death⁠2⁠11. CCTV footage shown to jurors later captured Stewart and Turley shaking hands and appearing to congratulate each other as they ran from the scene⁠7. The court heard the confrontation was between rival groups from East Kilbride⁠2⁠11. The specific gang names — the "Murray boys" and "Hemchie" — referenced in some early coverage do not appear in the supplied sources and have not been independently verified.

The video broadcast on this story called the killing "gang-related," and that framing has carried through early coverage. What the court record itself establishes, on the evidence presented at trial, is a violent confrontation between rival teenage groups from the same town, ending in the death of an unarmed boy who had tried to run.

Two of the three attackers were themselves teenagers. The third, named in some coverage as 19, would have been a young adult at the time of sentencing⁠4⁠5⁠6⁠8. The youngest was 15 — old enough under Scottish law to be tried in the High Court on the most serious charge in the criminal calendar.

Some accounts of the sentencing quote Judge Lord Scott calling the attack "pointless and unnecessary" and saying that Kayden Moy had done nothing to provoke what happened to him. The supplied sources do not, however, carry that quotation verbatim: the Herald's text is cut off before any judicial words appear⁠4, and the BBC, STV, Daily Record, LBC, Irvine Times and Glasgow Live pieces do not include a judge quote in the passages reviewed. The words attributed to the bench in some of the early reporting are consistent in tone with a Scottish sentencing in a murder of this kind, but the exact attribution cannot be confirmed from the sources in hand.

What is on the record is the family. Moy's father, speaking outside court, told reporters that "no family should have to endure the pain we live with," and the family's wider statement included the line, "We hope today's sentence sends a clear message that violence has devastating and irreversible consequences"⁠9⁠10. The Glasgow Live and Daily Record family pieces describe a family "devastated forever" and one that "won't find peace" — language drawn from the family themselves rather than editorial framing.

The killing itself, the ages of the victim and defendants, the guilty plea of Turley, the jury convictions of Stewart and the 15-year-old, and the life sentences with their respective minimum terms are all on the public record across multiple outlets⁠2⁠3⁠4⁠5⁠6⁠8⁠11. The CCTV evidence — Stewart and Turley congratulating each other as they ran from the beach — was shown to the jury and has been published⁠7.

What remains unresolved is Stewart's age. The two figures from credible outlets differ by a year, and that difference matters to any calculation of how long he will be a registered young offender after release. The published accounts also vary on whether the killing took place "in broad daylight," a phrase repeated in early reporting, or whether it took place in the late afternoon and early evening; the timing of the attack itself is not specified in the supplied sources.

And what is conspicuously thin in the public record is the judicial voice itself. Sentences this long are almost always accompanied by a published sentencing statement, either read aloud in open court or released in summary form. In this case, the reporting on what the judge actually said — as distinct from the victim's family or the prosecutor — is sparse, and the passages reviewed do not include a direct quote from Lord Scott.

A 16-year-old boy is dead. Three teenagers, two of them children at the time of the killing, will each spend at least the next fourteen to sixteen years of their lives inside. The earliest any of them could be released comes well into the 2040s. By then, Kayden Moy would have been in his thirties — older than his father was when he stood outside the High Court and asked the world to mark what had been done to his son.

Cases like this one rarely change the law. What they do, with grim consistency, is redraw the line that separates a teenage quarrel from a murder. The Irvine Beach killing was, on the evidence heard by the court, a confrontation that ended in a stabbing, and it has now been answered with a sentence measured in the decades a teenage boy will not live to see.

For the Moy family, the legal chapter closed on 21 July 2026 at the High Court in Glasgow. For the killers, that date is the start of a clock that runs well into the next century⁠2⁠3⁠5.