跳到内容
现在

体育 · 荷甲

查韦斯扳平,梅尔丁克绝杀,阿尔克马尔AZ逆转格罗宁根,以4–3取胜

查韦斯将比分扳成3–3,随后梅尔丁克罚入存在争议的补时点球,帮助阿尔克马尔AZ在两球落后的情况下完成逆转,并结束了球队连续四场联赛不胜的局面。

文字 阅读需 4 分钟 · 21 个来源

原语言视频

译自英文原文。

第54分钟,格罗宁根以3–1领先。他们离开阿尔克马尔时却一分未得。阿尔克马尔AZ连进三球,以4–3获胜;马特奥·查韦斯抹平了客队剩余的领先优势,随后墨克斯·梅尔丁克罚入一记存在争议的补时点球。⁠6⁠18

2026年11月8日,阿尔克马尔AZ在AFAS球场以这场胜利结束了连续四场未能在荷甲取胜的局面。梅尔丁克梅开二度,先是回应格罗宁根的早早破门,随后在90+1分钟打入制胜球。在这两粒进球之间,阿尔克马尔AZ一度落后两球,奥菲尔为球队吹响反攻号角,查韦斯则在第76分钟将比分扳平。阿尔克马尔AZ首次领先时,也正是最终比分。⁠2⁠6⁠13⁠18

这是一场值得庆祝的逆转,但结局并非可以轻易归为一场毫无争议的胜利。荷兰广播公司NOS称,决定胜负的点球判罚存在争议,并报道格罗宁根最终仅剩九人应战。这些情况都应与阿尔克马尔AZ的反扑一并写入比赛叙述;二者并不相互抵消。⁠18

4–3阿尔克马尔AZ最终的获胜比分 24
4此役获胜前,联赛连续未能取胜场次 1718
9格罗宁根终场时的场上球员人数 18

两度扳平,随后绝杀

开场的第一轮进球交锋,丝毫没有预示阿尔克马尔AZ之后要付出多大努力。昂德雷卡在第2分钟为格罗宁根首开纪录,梅尔丁克第9分钟扳平。半场结束时比分仍然持平,双方都没有带着进球优势进入下半场。⁠6⁠13

格罗宁根很快改变了局面。威鲁姆松在第47分钟破门,范贝亨随后于第54分钟将比分改写为3–1。下半场开场九分钟内,原本势均力敌的比赛变成了主队落后两球的局面。阿尔克马尔AZ若要逆转,就必须在不再失球的情况下连进三球。⁠6⁠13

奥菲尔在第61分钟打入了第一球。他的进球之所以重要,不仅因为缩小了分差,还因为格罗宁根扩大领先优势仅过去七分钟。阿尔克马尔AZ仍处于落后,但在比赛进入收官阶段之前,客队两球的优势已被削减了一半。⁠6

十五分钟后,查韦斯将比分追成3–3,完成反扑。据《Récord》报道,这位墨西哥后卫参与了一次团队配合,沿内侧通道前插,并在格罗宁根禁区内用左脚完成射门。正当阿尔克马尔AZ需要进攻火力时,一名后卫贡献了进球,也抹去了格罗宁根在半场后迅速建立的最后一点领先优势。⁠1

查韦斯打入的是扳平球,而非制胜球——这一点让他和梅尔丁克在本场比赛中的作用都得以恰当体现。查韦斯让阿尔克马尔AZ重新有机会拿到全部三分;球队还需要再进一球,才能将这个机会变为胜利。与此同时,格罗宁根虽然丢掉了领先优势,仍有机会守住平局。

据《Récord》报道,阿尔克马尔AZ扳平比分后仍继续进攻。决定胜负的机会出现在补时阶段,梅尔丁克在点球点主罚命中。Scorefoot和ScoreBlink均将这粒进球记录在90+1分钟,即下半场补时第一分钟。他在本场比赛的第二粒进球也让阿尔克马尔AZ首次领先,但此时已太迟,格罗宁根无力扳回局面。⁠1⁠6⁠9

结局仍存争议

点球决定了比分,却没有平息对判罚的争议。NOS的报道指出,这次判罚颇具争议,但现有报道并未对这场争议给出明确结论。现有经过核实的信息也不足以说明格罗宁根球员被罚下的具体原因。比赛最终以九人应战收场,不应取代对场上经过的完整叙述。⁠18

衡量查韦斯贡献最直观的依据,是他进球时的比分:3–3,主队仍有机会取胜。据《Récord》报道,他一直留在场上,直到第96分钟被梅斯·德维特换下。那时,梅尔丁克罚入点球,已经将这粒扳平球变成了球队逆转胜利的一部分。⁠1

格罗宁根的失利已经够惨淡,无需渲染:客场攻入三球,第54分钟时还领先两球,终场时却一分未得。阿尔克马尔AZ则凭这三分结束了连续四场联赛不胜。收获实实在在,尽管取胜的方式仍有争议。⁠6⁠18

来源18

在此处引用的来源中,Sportra最先发布,比本报道播出早17小时。 随后还有7家媒体发布。

10家媒体未注明日期:az.nldoelpunten.nldongqiudi.comFotMobKNVB.nlmsport.com

按媒体查看所有来源

来自 18 家媒体的 21 个来源· 引用最多的优先

播出原貌
  1. AZ Alkmaar overturned a two-goal deficit and beat Groningen with a stoppage-time penalty.
  2. The 4–3 victory ended AZ's four-match league winless run and delivered all three points. Whether AZ should have received the decisive penalty is still disputed.
  3. Groningen led 3–1 after 54 minutes at AFAS Stadion in Alkmaar. The November eighth match was in round twelve of the Eredivisie, the Dutch top division. AZ would have to score three unanswered goals to turn that deficit into victory.
  4. Ondrejka opened the scoring in the second minute. Meerdink equalized in the ninth, and the teams reached halftime level. Willumsson restored Groningen's lead in the 47th minute. Van Bergen made it 3–1 in the 54th, putting AZ two goals behind.
  5. Oufkir started AZ's recovery in the 61st minute. His goal cut Groningen's lead to 3–2. Fifteen minutes later, Mateo Chávez joined the attack and removed the visitors' remaining advantage.
  6. Chávez finished left-footed inside Groningen's penalty area. The Mexican defender had helped build the collective move before attacking an inside channel. His goal brought AZ level, and Meerdink would supply the winning finish from the penalty spot.
  7. AZ kept attacking after drawing level. Chávez's equalizer had kept a home victory within reach, but Groningen were still holding a point as the match approached stoppage time.
  8. Oufkir's 61st-minute goal and Chávez's 76th-minute equalizer set up the turnaround. Meerdink converted the penalty in the 91st minute, the first minute of second-half stoppage time. AZ took the lead for the first time with the match's final goal.
  9. Meerdink finished with two goals. He'd answered Groningen's opening strike early in the match, then returned to the scoresheet to complete the comeback. Groningen went from a two-goal advantage to leaving Alkmaar without a point.
  10. Groningen finished the match with nine players, and the decision to award the winning penalty remained disputed. Meerdink's conversion settled the result, while the controversy over that decision remained unresolved.
  11. Chávez stayed on until the 96th minute, when Mees de Wit replaced him. AZ's comeback secured their seventh league victory of the campaign.

译文更新于

近期播出