司法 · 倒影池案持续报道 · 第 2 篇，共 2 篇

特朗普施压后，法官禁止重启针对 David Hearn 的倒影池指控

政府承认，倒影池的损坏是安装不当所致，而非 Hearn 所为。法官永久驳回这项指控，因为特朗普的要求带来了案件可能重新被提起的风险。

播出 文字 阅读需 7 分钟74 个来源HeyDay News Desk · About usWatch report
与 HeyDex 一起探索

通过 RSS 关注

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

译自英文原文。

持续报道第 64 天

2 篇报道56 家媒体83 个来源2 个视频

完整报道
5 天无进展24 天无进展7 天无进展20 天无进展
  1. 第 1 次更新检察官曾指责一名奥运选手，如今却将矛头指向承包商。
  2. 第 2 次更新特朗普施压后，法官禁止重启针对 David Hearn 的倒影池指控当前位置

自上次报道以来的变化

62 天后

当时

检察官曾指责一名奥运选手，如今却将矛头指向承包商。

当时尚无定论

  • 承包商的名称，以及施工不当是否会导致任何处罚。
  • 在安装问题的证据出现之前，检察官为何起诉赫恩，以及调查过程如何展开。

我们说过将关注的

  • 法官是否批准撤案，以及最终命令的内容。
  • 国家广场上为美国建国250周年赶工的工程是否会在这起案件之外接受审查。

现在

政府承认，倒影池的损坏是安装不当所致，而非 Hearn 所为。法官永久驳回这项指控，因为特朗普的要求带来了案件可能重新被提起的风险。

新的进展

  • Edelman 驳回指控，但未明确是否永久驳回。
  • 围绕是否应永久驳回的进一步书面陈述之后，举行了听证会。
  • Edelman 作出不得再次起诉的驳回裁定，禁止恢复同一指控。

David Hearn 因拉扯已经开始剥落的泳池内衬，最高面临 10 年监禁。政府最终承认，他的行为并未降低泳池的价值，而且没有发生犯罪。尽管如此，唐纳德·特朗普总统仍要求再次起诉。1 22

如今，法官已封住了这一缺口。2026 年 10 月 1 日，华盛顿特区高等法院法官 Todd E. Edelman 驳回了针对 Hearn 破坏林肯纪念堂倒影池财产的指控，且不得再次起诉，禁止检方再次提出同一指控。他在长达 26 页的裁决中处理了一项非同寻常的风险：总统施压可能令政府自身已宣布毫无根据的起诉死灰复燃。1 22

本案必须以不得再次起诉的方式驳回，因此政府必须被禁止再次对 Hearn 先生提出这一指控。

法官 Todd E. Edelman 22

8 月 1 日，HeyDay News 报道称，司法部已申请撤销本案，其 20 页的文件将损坏归咎于承包商安装不当，而非 Hearn。这是检方的立场逆转，并非永久性的司法保障。新裁决是另一份文件，解决了尚未确定的问题：检方能否保留恢复指控的可能性。49 22

这项保护有明确范围。它仅适用于因倒影池事件而产生的这项指控，并不涵盖所有可能的未来起诉。这是驳回，而非陪审团作出的无罪裁决。但它远不止是检察官决定暂时停止起诉，同时保留再次起诉权。

逮捕前内衬就已失效

Hearn 触碰内衬之前，安装材料就已经开始脱落。有关诉讼文件的报道指出，涂层在完工后几乎立即开始剥落，而一名国家公园管理局工程师最迟在 6 月 9 日就已接到通知。Hearn 于 6 月 19 日被捕。后来有报道称，他拉扯的材料是泳池边缘已经剥落、价值极低的“过喷涂层”。18 12

大陪审团于 7 月 2 日起诉 Hearn，当天美国检察官 Jeanine Pirro 宣布了指控。Hearn 在 7 月 9 日的提审中表示不认罪。起诉书指称，他恶意损坏泳池内衬，造成 1,000 美元或以上的损失——这是被指控的重罪门槛，并非对他造成的损失作出的既定估值。64 65 22

尽管有报道将此案称为联邦破坏公物案，但这是一项依据《华盛顿特区法典》第 22-303 条提出的华盛顿特区地方重罪指控，由华盛顿特区高等法院审理，而非美国联邦地区法院。该案由联邦检察官提起；涉案财产属于美国政府，而且该地区的美国检察官也负责起诉许多地方罪行。67 岁的 Hearn 面临一项指控，最高可判 10 年监禁。他没有被定罪，也没有被判处监禁。3 22 1

随后，内政部和国家公园管理局提供的信息动摇了刑事指控的基础。检方将大面积剥落归因于 Atlantic Industrial Coatings 安装不当，以及为赶在独立日美国 250 周年纪念活动前完工而施工仓促。政府表示，如果能早些掌握承包商的相关信息，就不会申请起诉。49 48

Edelman 的命令指出，政府已认定“没有发生犯罪”。损坏“是承包商匆忙且拙劣地安装内衬所致”，而“Hearn 先生的行为没有影响泳池的价值”。这并非从一项巨额刑事损坏指控退让到一项较小的指控，而是承认刑事指控站不住脚。现有调查结果指出安装失败且施工仓促，但没有提供每个缺陷环节的完整技术说明。22

从放弃指控到永久驳回

  1. 2026 年 7 月 31 日

    Pirro 的办公室请求撤销起诉书，但不妨碍日后重新起诉。

    49
  2. 2026 年 8 月 6 日

    Edelman 驳回指控，但未明确是否永久驳回。

    2757
  3. 2026 年 9 月 4 日

    围绕是否应永久驳回的进一步书面陈述之后，举行了听证会。

    22
  4. 2026 年 10 月 1 日

    Edelman 作出不得再次起诉的驳回裁定，禁止恢复同一指控。

    22

为何仅仅撤案还不够

即使已放弃起诉，政府仍反对永久结案。其 8 月 18 日的答复仍请求在不妨碍日后重新起诉的情况下撤案。检方承认已不再调查。剩下的争议不在于原起诉书是否有证据支持，而在于 Hearn 是否仍须面临该指控卷土重来的风险。8 1

特朗普的言论说明了这种风险为何重要。在 8 月 1 日的一篇 Truth Social 帖文中，他驳斥了其政府的解释：“承包商可能确实遇到了一些问题，但主要损坏是破坏者造成的！”8 月 3 日，他称 Pirro“怯懦退缩”，并说她“像雨伞一样折叠起来”。这些说法既不能证明发生了破坏行为，也无法推翻政府掌握的相反证据。22

他在 8 月 7 日提出的要求，已不只是对内衬问题表示异议。特朗普写道：“美国检察官 Jeanine Pirro 应重新审视她仓促作出的决定。”他将这一要求与 Hearn 和 ActBlue 的政治关联，以及由 Norm Eisen 和 CREW 代理一事联系起来。特朗普针对这些人士和组织的指控，并非认定其存在不当行为的结论。在此事中的重要之处，是总统坚持要求检方重新审视一名具名人士的案件，部分原因在于此人的政治立场和律师。22

Edelman 指出，特朗普曾要求重新起诉，部分原因是 Hearn 的政治活动以及其律师的身份；特朗普还公开表示可能解雇美国检察官。法官写道，Hearn 面临一种“独特的可能性”：总统向下属官员施压，可能令政府重启一个自己已宣布毫无根据的案件。他称未来出现一宗有根据的起诉的可能性“纯属幻想”。22

翻修费用并非损害赔偿额

不应把项目数百万美元的标价误认为是 Hearn 造成的损失。《纽约时报》5 月 11 日报道，涂层合同金额约为 13.1 million 美元；《今日美国》6 月 16 日报道约为 14.2 million 美元；ABC 新闻 6 月 19 日报道超过 14.65 million 美元；CNN 在 6 月 25 日的合同摘要中则提到约 14.7 million 美元。这些是不同日期对涂层合同金额的报道，并非不同项目，也不能相加为总成本。62 60 61 63

另一项由 Green Water Solutions 承接的藻类治理和过滤工程合同，金额约为 1.7 million 美元，使报道所述的工程总额接近 16 million 美元。这些约数并非经审计的最终支出，也没有任何一笔是经证实由 Hearn 造成的刑事损害赔偿额。它们体现了公共资金支持的工程规模，而该工程的安装出现了问题。60 61

同一安装问题也影响了另外三起起诉。8 月初，检方分别放弃了针对 Justin Carreno、Sophie Dennison-Gibby 和 Cameron Thiers 的轻罪破坏财产指控。这些指控涉及低于 1,000 美元的损坏。检方试图撤销案件的对象共有 4 人，但 10 月 1 日的永久驳回令仅涉及 Hearn 的重罪案件。69 71 22

Hearn 的体育履历有助于吸引关注：他以 Davey Hearn 之名为人所知，曾代表美国参加 1992 年、1996 年和 2000 年奥运会的激流回旋皮划艇比赛。他没有获得奥运奖牌，但曾在 1985 年和 1995 年的世界锦标赛个人项目中夺金。案件的法律利害并不取决于他的体育成绩，而是一项重罪指控、可能面临的监禁，以及再次为同一项已被撤销的指控辩护的可能性。37 38

10 月 2 日，Hearn 告诉 ABC 新闻，Pirro 和特朗普欠他一个道歉。当被问及总统是否会道歉时，他回答：“你知道，如果猪会飞，也许吧。”报道并未证实有人道歉。Pirro 的办公室没有立即回应有关永久驳回的询问；10 月 1 日至 2 日的报道也未提及已宣布上诉或定于某日举行的后续程序。这并不保证不会有人尝试提出异议。当前有效的结果是已经发布的命令：这项指控不得恢复。53 1 22

播出原貌 22 行
  1. On August 1 we reported prosecutors sought dismissal. Now a judge has barred refiling. David Hearn faced a felony charge carrying up to ten years in prison over a pool lining that failed because of botched installation. Why did ending a case the government considered meritless require a permanent judicial bar?
  2. President Donald Trump demanded another prosecution after his own administration concluded the accusation did not stand up. That pressure left Hearn exposed to a renewed case even though prosecutors acknowledged they were no longer investigating. The October 1 ruling closes that opening.
  3. Two words make the protection permanent: with prejudice. D.C. Superior Court Judge Todd E. Edelman’s 26-page order bars prosecutors from bringing this same Reflecting Pool destruction-of-property charge again. It is not a jury acquittal, and it does not give Hearn blanket immunity from unrelated future prosecutions. But prosecutors cannot simply reopen this abandoned charge.
  4. The new ruling is different from the 20-page government filing in our August report. That earlier document explained the prosecution’s reversal; it did not yet guarantee that the charge could never return.
  5. Hearn was charged under local D.C. law, not with a federal vandalism offense. Federal prosecutors brought the case, and the allegedly damaged property belonged to the United States, but the charge was one felony count under D.C. Code section 22-303 in D.C. Superior Court, not U.S. District Court. The U.S. Attorney for the District prosecutes many local offenses.
  6. The indictment alleged malicious injury to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool’s lining and damage of at least one thousand dollars, the alleged felony threshold. That was an accusation, not an established valuation of damage Hearn caused. No conviction or prison sentence was imposed.
  7. The lining was peeling before Hearn was arrested. It began failing almost immediately after completion, and a National Park Service engineer had been alerted by June 9. Hearn’s arrest came June 19. Prosecutors accused him of pulling at already-peeling material; the material he touched was subsequently described as perimeter overspray of minimal value.
  8. A grand jury indicted Hearn on July 2, and U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro announced the indictment that day. He was arraigned July 9 and pleaded not guilty.
  9. Interior Department and National Park Service information then dismantled the criminal premise. The widespread peeling resulted from Atlantic Industrial Coatings’ flawed installation and a rush to finish before America 250 events around Independence Day. The government concluded that no crime had occurred and that Hearn’s actions had no effect on the pool’s value. It would not have sought the indictment had it possessed the contractor information earlier.
  10. This was not a reduction from a large criminal damage bill to a smaller one. The government acknowledged that the accusation itself lacked merit. The findings establish installation failure and haste, but they do not provide a complete technical specification of every defective installation step.
  11. The publicly funded renovation involved work near sixteen million dollars, but that is not a loss attributable to Hearn. The coating award was reported at about thirteen-point-one million dollars in May, roughly fourteen-point-two million by June 16, more than fourteen-point-six-five million by June 19, and about fourteen-point-seven million in a later June contract summary.
  12. A separate Green Water Solutions algae and filtration award was about one-point-seven million dollars. Together, the components put the reported work near sixteen million. The fourteen-million-dollar shorthand refers to the coating award, not another project or an additional cost. These differently dated, partly rounded figures are not an audited final expenditure, and none is a criminal damage bill established against Hearn.
  13. Prosecutors wanted to stop the case while keeping the option to bring it back. Pirro’s office filed its dismissal motion July 31 at 4:45 p.m., requesting dismissal without prejudice. On August 6, Edelman dismissed the charge but deferred whether that dismissal would be permanent.
  14. The government’s August 18 reply still opposed a permanent bar. Further briefing and a September 4 hearing led to the October 1 decision. The late-July request, August dismissal and October finality are different stages, not conflicting accounts. A September 11 trial-readiness date appeared on the earlier motion’s caption; that does not establish that the proceeding occurred or that a trial remained pending after dismissal.
  15. Three other defendants’ cases were abandoned separately. Early-August filings, around August 3, ended misdemeanor destruction-of-property prosecutions against Justin Carreno, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Cameron Thiers. Their allegations concerned damage below one thousand dollars. Four people in all had cases prosecutors sought to drop, but the October 1 permanent-dismissal order applies to Hearn alone.
  16. Trump demanded that Pirro revisit the case while attacking Hearn’s political associations and legal representation. His August 7 demand linked renewed prosecution to Hearn’s involvement with ActBlue and representation by Norm Eisen and CREW. His allegations of wrongdoing against those people and organizations were accusations, not established findings.
  17. That demand followed an August 1 rejection of his administration’s explanation. Trump insisted that vandals caused the major damage despite contractor difficulties. On August 3 he attacked Pirro for backing down. On August 16 he again insisted the pool had been vandalized and attacked the legal competence of people who disagreed. These were Truth Social remarks, not confirmed original X posts. His assertions did not establish vandalism or overcome the government’s contrary evidence.
  18. Presidential pressure could revive a case the government had already declared meritless. That is why simply dropping the charge was not enough. Edelman’s decision addressed the risk that subordinate prosecutors would bring it back because the president wanted them to, rather than because new evidence justified it. Trump had demanded renewed prosecution partly over Hearn’s political activity and lawyer, and publicly entertained firing the U.S. Attorney.
  19. The permanent bar answers that risk. The evidence did not support the accusation; the president’s demands nevertheless created a possibility of prosecution. The order distinguishes a renewed case justified by evidence from one driven by political pressure.
  20. Hearn, 67, is the former U.S. canoeist known as Davey Hearn. He competed in men’s C1 canoe slalom at the 1992, 1996 and 2000 Olympics, finishing eleventh, ninth and twelfth. He did not win an Olympic medal, but won individual world-championship gold in 1985 and 1995. His athletic record explains the attention, not the legal protection: the stakes were a felony accusation, possible imprisonment and having to defend the same abandoned charge again.
  21. No appeal or dated next court proceeding was announced in the October 1–2 coverage. That does not guarantee that a challenge can never be attempted. Pirro’s office did not immediately respond to inquiries about the permanent dismissal. The operative order bars refiling this charge.
  22. Hearn wants apologies from both Pirro and Trump. On October 2, he expressed little expectation that the president would apologize. No apology had been established.

来源

74 个来源49 家媒体1 个视频1 篇通稿

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。