跳到内容
现在

报道

基辅办公楼遭袭致4人死亡，袭击扰乱互联网接入

基辅办公楼遭袭造成四人死亡，针对通信设施的袭击也扰乱了互联网接入。受损情况比遇难者身份——或所有服务何时恢复——更为明确。

文字 阅读需 5 分钟 · 61 个来源

HeyDex

原语言视频

译自英文原文。

在基辅一栋办公楼外发现两具遗体，楼内发现一具，停车场的一辆车内还有一具。9月25日下午晚些时候，基辅警方统计称，俄罗斯无人机袭击首都索洛米扬斯基区这栋建筑后，共有四人死亡。应急人员扑灭了建筑旁的火灾。经核查的报道没有说明死者身份。⁠40

此次袭击发生在一周内针对数据中心和互联网服务提供商的一系列攻击期间。乌克兰数字转型部估计，9月23日和24日袭击后发生的互联网中断，影响了基辅及周边地区约100,000户家庭。这一数字统计的是受临时断网影响的家庭，而非死亡人数、个人用户数量，或截至9月27日已知仍处于断网状态的连接数。⁠27⁠1

49月25日办公楼遭袭死亡人数 40
~100,000估计受此前断网影响的家庭数 27

我们在9月13日报道，9月11日基辅加油站遭遇数次无人机袭击，两人死亡。本文所述的四人死亡发生在之后的一次袭击中，地点是一栋办公楼；通信服务中断则早于这起致命袭击。它们是不同事件，并非对加油站袭击死亡人数的修正。

随着救援人员开展工作，9月25日的伤亡数字有所变化。《基辅邮报》在一篇约于基辅时间下午3:10发布的报道中称有三人死亡；警方于4:45发布的通报则称发现四具遗体。市长维塔利·克利奇科称七人受伤，其中包括一名儿童；警方随后报告至少10人受伤。这些是同一次袭击中不同的受伤人数统计，不能相加。⁠42⁠22⁠40

损毁情况比具体地点更明确

《卫报》将这起致命袭击报道为对Datagroup办公室的袭击。另经核实的警方报道将遭袭地点称为一栋办公楼，但没有证实四名遇难者是否全都死于Datagroup的办公场所。Datagroup负责人米哈伊洛·舍列姆巴表示，公司的数据中心受损，但员工安然无恙，客户数据得以保全，服务则由备用站点继续提供。不得将遇难者称为Datagroup员工；经核查的报道未能确切说明该公司的设备是否位于发现遗体的那栋建筑内。⁠1⁠40⁠44

此前通信设施受损的影响远不止一栋建筑。服务提供商报告称，Pavutina、UTELS、KyivLink和Crazy Network均受到影响。Crazy Network报告称，基辅、文尼察和赫梅利尼茨基地区的客户失去了互联网接入，其电话服务也受到干扰。一则报道说，大多数UTELS客户在约两小时内恢复连接，但两家托管服务公司无法估计恢复日期。两小时恢复连接指的是UTELS，并非所有服务提供商或全部100,000户家庭的恢复时间表。⁠5⁠7⁠10

区分日期很重要。关于9月23日一栋设有通信设备的索洛米扬斯基区办公楼受损的报道，不能自动视为对9月25日造成四人死亡的袭击的描述。报道提到基辅三座数据中心可能受损，也不能据此认定三处均遭到直接袭击。⁠6⁠31

压力仍在持续。9月26日，Cosmonova位于基辅的数据中心遭到两次袭击，其骨干网络受损，互联网服务、电视广播和部分乌克兰媒体业务中断。报道将Kolo.TV列为受影响的服务提供商之一。Cosmonova称员工安全无恙，客户数据通过地理冗余得到保全，但受损的基辅设施将不再运行。该公司正在将服务迁往其他地点，并逐步恢复服务。数据得到保全不等于连接未曾中断，迁移也不等于重新开放。9月27日关于第二次袭击的报道，不能证明当天还发生了第三次袭击。⁠49⁠50⁠51⁠52⁠23⁠54

外交部长安德烈·瑟比加称，针对乌克兰主要数据中心的袭击意在扰乱信息流通。总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基表示，对数据中心和互联网服务提供商的袭击影响了人们保持联系、学习和工作的能力。《卫报》称，这似乎是削弱乌克兰数字经济的行动。服务中断和设施受损都有记录，但目前没有证据表明存在明确规定这一目的的行动命令。经核查的报道也没有证实全国范围的互联网崩溃，或医院、银行服务经确认遭到中断。⁠1⁠2⁠3

边境另一侧的火灾

在波兰，另有一项调查涉及9月23日发生在沃拉·克罗博夫斯卡的一座星链地面站火灾。该站支持包括乌克兰在内的中欧和东欧地区的网络连接。相关报道称，供电设施受损，包括变压器、配电板和发电机。报道并未证实天线是否受损、该站是否仍在运行，或乌克兰军队是否因此失去连接。⁠33⁠18⁠39

波兰副总理克日什托夫·高科夫斯基称，这场火灾是意在扰乱乌克兰军队所用互联网接入的破坏活动，并提出俄罗斯可能涉案。波兰国家检察院于9月25日立案调查，调查内容包括涉嫌破坏活动、为外国情报机构从事针对波兰的活动，以及与恐怖主义有关的犯罪。检察官普热梅斯瓦夫·诺瓦克表示，有合理理由怀疑行动由俄罗斯特勤部门下令。这是调查中的怀疑，并不意味着已确认作案者，也不能证明此事与基辅袭击协同实施。⁠35⁠33⁠56

已知

  • 9月25日基辅办公楼遭袭，造成四人死亡。 40
  • Cosmonova称，其受损的基辅设施将不会重新开放。 51

未知

  • 遇难者身份、服务完全恢复的情况，以及波兰火灾与基辅袭击之间是否有关联，均尚未查明。

后续

  • 受影响的客户能否在其他地点恢复服务，以及波兰调查人员会就火灾得出什么结论。

这一周造成的损失无法用一个断网数字概括。备用站点维持了部分服务运行，一些客户很快恢复连接；其他服务提供商尚无法估计恢复时间，而一座受损数据中心永久关闭。办公楼遭袭造成四人死亡。这两类伤害都是真实的，但现有证据不足以将这些死亡归咎于Datagroup员工，或把波兰一起仍在调查中的疑似火灾纳入已证实的协同行动。

来源45

在此处引用的来源中，The Guardian最先发布，比本报道播出早27小时。
  1. The Guardian
  2. HeyDay News

44家媒体未注明日期：RBC-UkraineMediasatRzeczpospolitaThe Kyiv IndependentBBC NewsBBC News

按媒体查看所有来源

来自 45 家媒体的 61 个来源· 引用最多的优先

播出原貌
  1. On September 13 we reported petrol-station strikes killed two; now an office strike has killed four. Attacks on communications infrastructure have also temporarily disrupted internet access for an estimated 100,000 households in Kyiv and the surrounding region. A damaged data-centre operator says its Kyiv site will not reopen. Which connections have returned, and is a fire at a Polish satellite station connected to the attacks?
  2. The four deaths came in a Russian drone strike on an office building in Kyiv’s Solomianskyi district on September 25. An early count stood at three. Later that afternoon, the count rose to four bodies: two outside the building, one inside and one in a car in the parking lot. That sequence does not establish when each person died. Emergency crews extinguished a fire beside the building in the parking area. The victims’ identities have not been established.
  3. The injury count also differs: seven, including a child, in one account, and at least ten in a later one. Those are competing counts of the same attack, not figures to add together. Both accounts put the death toll at four.
  4. Datagroup’s data centre was damaged, but its employees were unharmed, customer data was preserved and services continued from backup sites. The fatal strike has been identified as a hit on Datagroup’s offices, yet the checked police and company accounts do not establish that the four people died on its premises. There is no verified street address or conclusive match between the company’s equipment and the building where the bodies were found. The four must not be described as Datagroup employees.
  5. The household estimate concerns earlier attacks, beginning September 23 and continuing through the next day. It measures households affected by temporary internet disruption, not individual users and not the number still offline now. Damage at a Kyiv data centre affected Pavutina, UTELS, KyivLink and Crazy Network. Crazy Network’s customers lost internet access in Kyiv, Vinnytsia and the Khmelnytskyi region, and its telephone service was disrupted.
  6. Most UTELS customers were reconnected in about two hours. That was not a restoration time for every provider or for all 100,000 households; two hosting firms had no estimated restoration date in the same account. A communications-and-data-centre office building was also damaged in Solomianskyi district on September 23. That earlier damage cannot automatically be treated as the September 25 fatal strike. Nor is a suggestion that three data centres might have been damaged a verified count of three direct hits.
  7. Cosmonova’s Kyiv data centre was struck twice on September 26. Its backbone network was damaged, interrupting internet services, television broadcasts and some Ukrainian media operations; Kolo.TV was among the affected providers. Its staff were safe and client data was preserved through copies held in different places. Services were being moved to other resources and restored gradually. That protects data, but it does not mean every customer’s connection stayed up.
  8. The damaged Cosmonova facility will not operate again. A later account looking back at the second strike does not establish a third strike on September 27. The attacks reached beyond company buildings: losing a connection can affect calls, study and paid work, while hosting and media services depend on functioning networks. Ukraine’s assessment is that targeting major data centres seeks to disrupt information flow. The damage and service interruptions are established; a specific operational order to weaken the digital economy is not. There is no evidence here of a nationwide internet collapse or a verified interruption to hospital or banking services.
  9. A fire at a Starlink ground station in Wola Krobowska, central Poland, damaged its power infrastructure on September 23. The station supports connectivity across Central and Eastern Europe, including Ukraine. Accounts describe damage to a transformer, distribution board and generator; they do not establish whether antennas were damaged or whether the station remained operational. Polish authorities disclosed the fire the next day, and prosecutors opened an investigation on September 25 into suspected sabotage, activity for a foreign intelligence service against Poland and a terrorism-related offence.
  10. Poland’s deputy prime minister called the fire sabotage intended to disrupt internet access used by Ukrainian forces and raised possible Russian involvement. A prosecutor voiced reasonable suspicion that those responsible acted on orders from Russian special services. Neither suspicion identifies a perpetrator or proves that the fire was coordinated with the Kyiv strikes. There is no measured disruption to Ukrainian forces’ connectivity from the fire.
  11. So the answer is still divided. Some internet service returned quickly, and backup systems preserved customer data, but full restoration for every affected household and hosting customer has not been established; Cosmonova’s damaged Kyiv site will not reopen. Polish investigators have not established who caused the station fire or whether it was connected to the attacks in Ukraine.

译文更新于

近期播出