跳到内容
現在

報導持續追蹤 · 第 1 篇報導,共 2 篇

Overnight ruling clears Drumcree march on Garvaghy Road

A further High Court hearing upheld permission for a restricted Orange Order return down Garvaghy Road hours before its scheduled departure. Whether the march took place is not yet verified.

文字 閱讀需 4 分鐘 · 49 個來源

提供英文版

At about 2:15 a.m. on Sunday, September 27, a High Court hearing ended with permission for the Orange Order to march down Portadown’s Garvaghy Road. The permitted procession was due to leave Drumcree Church by 8 a.m.—less than six hours later. The overnight ruling cleared the legal route through a mainly nationalist neighborhood; it did not establish that the march took place.⁠4

That distinction matters because the legal position had changed twice in a matter of hours. On Saturday, a judge temporarily blocked the return parade after residents challenged the Parades Commission’s permission. Late that night, the Court of Appeal lifted the injunction but allowed another hearing. Only the further High Court decision upheld the commission’s underlying permission. Reports that stopped at the appeal, with the second hearing still pending, have been overtaken.⁠1⁠4

The route through the courts

  1. Fri Sep 25

    The Parades Commission permits a restricted return along Garvaghy Road.

    33
  2. Sat Sep 26

    The High Court temporarily blocks the march after a residents’ challenge.

    20
  3. Sat Sep 26, about 23:30

    The Court of Appeal sets aside the injunction and allows a further hearing.

    8
  4. Sun Sep 27, about 02:15

    The further High Court hearing upholds the commission’s permission.

    4

The Garvaghy Road Residents Group, also called the Garvaghy Road Residents’ Coalition in court coverage, sought judicial review of the commission’s decision. Mrs Justice Patricia Smyth issued the temporary injunction on Saturday and warned that the dispute could escalate. While the ban stood, the residents’ group undertook to call off a counter-protest. Portadown Orange Order representatives challenged the injunction. At about 11:30 p.m., the Court of Appeal set it aside; Lady Chief Justice Dame Siobhan Keegan said the first judge had “erred in law.” The available accounts do not establish the precise error.⁠1⁠8⁠20

The appeal court then allowed the case to be heard by a different High Court judge. That hearing upheld the commission’s determination at about 2:15 a.m. The checked accounts do not identify the judge who presided over it, set out that judge’s detailed reasons or establish who requested the further hearing. Residents’ lawyers had questioned whether the police assessment behind the change in permission had itself changed. The complete assessment and the commission’s detailed reasoning are not established in the available material.⁠4⁠27

What the permission actually allows

The commission authorized Portadown District Orange Lodge to return from Drumcree Church along Drumcree Road and Garvaghy Road to an Orange Hall in Portadown. The limit is 35 people in all, including five named marshals—not 35 marchers plus five marshals. Initial reports said bands and supporters were barred. The procession had to depart the church no later than 8 a.m. British Summer Time on Sunday and disperse at the hall by 9:30 a.m. Reports differ on whether the hall’s street is spelled Carlton or Carleton; the restriction does not depend on resolving that spelling here.⁠1⁠2⁠35

A march to Drumcree Church and permission to return down Garvaghy Road are different things. The return route runs through a mainly nationalist area and was at the center of disputes that produced serious violence in the 1990s. The new permission has been described as the first for this route in almost 30 years. RTÉ News’s September 25 report called it the first since 1998, but other accounts describe 1998 as the year of a disputed return march the Order has repeatedly sought to complete. That comparison should not be mistaken for proof that a procession last passed down Garvaghy Road in 1998.⁠2⁠17

The restrictions make the permitted procession small and bandless. They do not make the dispute small for people living along its route. First Minister Michelle O’Neill called the commission’s decision “reckless” and said residents should be able to live without sectarian harassment. The Democratic Unionist Party welcomed it as a breakthrough. Ahead of the planned march, hundreds gathered in the Garvaghy Road area, and protesters were reported to have begun blocking the road. Those accounts do not give a verified final crowd count or establish what happened there after the overnight ruling.⁠2⁠9⁠10

Police preparations carried their own unresolved numbers. The Police Service of Northern Ireland activated mutual-aid arrangements for support from Scotland. RTÉ News reported on September 25 that 100 additional officers were being drafted in; BBC News reported on September 26 that about 200 were understood to be coming. These are time-stamped reports of planned reinforcements, not confirmed arrival or deployment figures. The later estimate supersedes the earlier snapshot without establishing a final headcount.⁠2⁠1

已知

  • The further High Court hearing upheld permission for the restricted Garvaghy Road return march. 4

未知

  • The checked accounts do not establish whether the procession set off, completed the route, or was followed by confrontations or arrests.

後續

  • Confirmation of what happened on the road, and how many officers were deployed.

The court answered the immediate legal question shortly before the scheduled departure: the restricted return was permitted. Whether it happened—and whether residents and police faced the procession they had spent the night preparing for—remains unverified in the checked accounts. Legal clearance is the last established development, not a report of a completed march.⁠4

時間軸

第 2 天 · 2 篇報導

事件時間軸
  1. 我們的播報 · 第 1 次更新目前位置

    Overnight ruling clears Drumcree march on Garvaghy Road
  2. Protesters hold the route during the authorized window; marchers remain at Drumcree.

  3. Police Land Rovers block an attempt to set out from the church.

  4. Five members approach the police line and are turned back.

來源30

在此引用的來源中,RTÉ News最早發布,比本報導播出早了37 小時。 隨後另有 1 家媒體發布。

28 家媒體未標註日期:Belfast Livebelfasttelegraph.co.ukRTE.ieThe IndependentThe StandardArmagh I

持續追蹤 · 第 1 篇報導,共 2 篇

依媒體列出所有來源

來自 30 家媒體的 49 個來源· 引用最多的優先

播出版本
  1. A second court has cleared the Orange Order to march down Portadown’s contested Garvaghy Road. The ruling came only hours before a tightly restricted procession was due through a mainly nationalist neighborhood, where hundreds had gathered. The legal question is settled for now. But did the march actually take place, and what happened on the road?
  2. The further High Court hearing ended at about 2:15 a.m. on Sunday, September 27. It upheld the Parades Commission’s permission for Portadown District Orange Lodge to make the return march. Earlier accounts stopped after an appeal overturned a temporary ban but left another hearing pending. That account has been overtaken: overturning the ban and upholding the underlying permission were two separate decisions.
  3. Residents challenged the permission by judicial review. On Saturday, Mrs Justice Patricia Smyth temporarily stopped the march and warned that the dispute could escalate. While that ban stood, the residents’ group undertook to call off a counter-protest. Portadown Orange Order representatives challenged the injunction. At about 11:30 p.m., the Court of Appeal set it aside. Lady Chief Justice Dame Siobhan Keegan said the first judge had erred in law. The appeal court then allowed a hearing before a different High Court judge, which upheld the commission’s decision.
  4. The precise error found on appeal is not established in the available account. Nor are the second judge’s identity, that judge’s detailed reasons, or who requested the further hearing. Residents’ lawyers had questioned whether the police assessment behind the change in permission had itself changed. The complete assessment and the commission’s detailed reasoning have not been established.
  5. Just 35 people in all were permitted to take part, including five named marshals; those five were not additional places. Initial accounts said bands and supporters were barred. The authorized return was from Drumcree Church, along Drumcree Road and Garvaghy Road, to an Orange Hall in Portadown. It had to leave the church by 8 a.m. British Summer Time and disperse at the hall by 9:30. Accounts differ over whether the hall’s street is spelled Carlton or Carleton.
  6. Permission to return down Garvaghy Road is not the same as permission to march to Drumcree Church. The return route runs through a mainly nationalist area, and disputes over it led to serious violence in the 1990s. This permission has been described as the first for the route in almost 30 years. An early account said since 1998, but 1998 is also described as the year of a disputed return march the Order repeatedly sought to complete. It is not established here as the last year a procession actually passed down Garvaghy Road.
  7. First Minister Michelle O’Neill called the permission reckless and said residents should be able to live without sectarian harassment. The Democratic Unionist Party welcomed it as a breakthrough. Ahead of the planned march, hundreds gathered around Garvaghy Road, and protesters were reported to have begun blocking it. There is no verified final crowd count or established account here of what followed Sunday’s ruling.
  8. The Police Service of Northern Ireland activated mutual-aid arrangements for reinforcements from Scotland. An early account put the planned support at 100 additional officers; a later one said about 200 were understood to be coming. Those are time-stamped estimates of planned support, not confirmed arrivals or deployments. The total policing deployment is also unconfirmed.
  9. The overnight ruling answered whether the restricted march was legally permitted: it was. It did not establish that anyone set off, how many marched, whether the procession completed Garvaghy Road, or whether there were confrontations or arrests. The last verified development is the court’s permission at about 2:15 a.m., with the scheduled departure less than six hours away.

近期播出