司法 · アンドルー氏の令状への異議申し立てなぜ容疑者が、自宅を捜索した警察を訴えるのか執筆 2026年10月6日 20:29 UTC視聴文字起こし0:09Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is challenging in court the warrants police used to0:13search his homes.0:14He was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, and he has been neither0:19charged nor cleared.0:20If he wins, materials seized in the searches could become inadmissible, though0:25police could appeal.0:26So what does Thursday's hearing actually decide?0:29And what is still unknown?0:30An old Bailey judge issued the warrants on 18th of February.0:33He was arrested the next day, his 66th birthday, questioned under caution for 110:38hours, then released under investigation.0:40Nearly eight months later, his claim to quash those warrants is before the High0:43Court.0:44Detectives searched two homes.0:45His residence on the Sandringham estate, also reported as Marsh Farm and Royal Lodge0:50in Windsor.0:51The allegation is that as UK trade envoy, he shared sensitive information with0:55Jeffrey Epstein.0:56He has always denied wrongdoing.0:58The force that arrested him is the other side of this case.1:01Its investigation continues, and it is also asking the court to restrict access to1:05certain documents, arguing that release could affect that investigation.1:09The accounts differ, Thursday or around the ninth, the judicial review, or the1:14release of documents.1:16The better supported reading is one Thursday hearing on document restrictions.1:20That is an inference, not a confirmed fact.1:23At 2 p.m.1:24Thursday, mister Justice Nicholas Hilliard, who did not issue the warrants, hears1:28the application on document restrictions, in private, at least at the start.1:33It is not the full review.1:35Media may be heard if restrictions are contemplated.1:37Whether Andrew attends is unknown.1:40No court has found the warrants unlawful.1:42A judge granted permission for the review earlier this year, which means only that1:45the claim is arguable.1:47His legal team say the warrants were not lawful, but the grounds are not public and1:51no statement from his lawyers has been published.1:53Nobody has named who is paying for a high court challenge.1:56Buckingham Palace says none of it comes from the king's allocation to Andrew and2:00that the king has no role in the legal strategy.2:02Taxpayer funding is not involved.2:05Thursday addresses only the police application to restrict court documents.2:09It is fairly unusual for the subject of an investigation to challenge its handling2:13and his arrest.2:14Still unknown, the legal grounds, the funder when the full review is heard, and2:18whether the investigation ends in a charge or no further action.記事を読むストーリーの時系列HeyDexショート動画 ↗誰が何を報じたか複数のメディアが報じた論点Andrew’s arrest on suspicion of misconduct8媒体✓High Court ruling on the warrants’ legality独立して確認 · 7媒体✓Police effort to retain seized material独立して確認 · 6媒体Allegations involving information shared with Epstein6媒体Properties searched on the day of arrest6媒体Andrew’s legal challenge to the searches5媒体✓Whether the police investigation is ongoing独立して確認 · 5媒体✓Effect of quashing warrants on investigation独立して確認 · 4媒体Judge’s finding of significant warrant error3媒体Scheduled High Court hearing3媒体Date the properties were searched3媒体Possible effect on use of evidence3媒体Legal action against police over arrest2媒体Police agreement with the court’s ruling2媒体Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has begun legal proceedings against Thames Valley Police.2媒体Warrants quashed for two properties2媒体Police statement on proceedings and investigation2媒体Legal provision required for the warrants2媒体Agreement that the warrants were unlawful2媒体Custody of material during the legal challenge2媒体Uncertainty over return or retention of seized material2媒体1社だけが報じた論点3BBC Newsのみが報道Police acceptance of the warrant error10月8日 14:13 UTCTiming of the warrants being quashed10月8日 17:00 UTCITV Newsのみが報道Andrew’s legal team’s view of the warrants10月5日 18:07 UTC各行は、そのメディアの報道から私たちが記録した主張です。2026年10月9日 20:12 UTC時点で比較。
