跳到内容
现在

报道

爱尔兰投票决定对阵以色列;巴祖努退出两场比赛

绝大多数队员投票支持履行爱尔兰队对阵以色列队的欧国联赛程,但门将加文·巴祖努退出,球队内部的分歧仍未解决。

文字 阅读需 4 分钟 · 58 个来源

原语言视频

译自英文原文。

门将加文·巴祖努退出了爱尔兰队即将对阵以色列队的两场比赛。他的队友投票决定参赛。爱尔兰足球协会称,球队于9月26日在匈牙利经过长时间讨论后,“绝大多数”队员支持履行欧国联赛程。协会没有公布投票结果。爱尔兰的决定使比赛继续留在赛程表上,但并未消除球队内部的分歧。⁠1⁠21

讨论始于一名球员当天上午告诉主教练海米尔·哈尔格里姆松,自己不愿参赛并打算退出。巴祖努随后承认自己就是这名球员。他说,自己并非轻率地作出这一决定,并认为参赛是不对的。面对以色列在加沙的行动,外界有人呼吁抵制这些比赛;巴祖努的反对是个人拒绝,并非爱尔兰队退出。⁠2⁠5⁠45

人生中总有几次机会,让你能够为更大的事业挺身而出。我坚信,这就是其中一次。

加文·巴祖努 18

巴祖努还说:“杀害无辜者是错误的”,并提到了该地区发生的暴行。与此同时,哈尔格里姆松直言,多数票并不意味着所有人都赞成:“没有人愿意踢这场比赛。”他说,只有一名球员会缺席9月27日的比赛,而投票反对参赛的球员仍可入选。球队计划当晚继续讨论,也可能在次日进一步商谈。换言之,投票决定履行赛程,并不等同于支持比赛。⁠15⁠21⁠2

目前也没有可靠数据说明队内有多少人反对参赛。一篇实时报道称,另有两名球员持类似的反对立场,但这既不是投票人数,也不能证明他们进一步退出。另一篇报道说,投票前,爱尔兰足球协会曾联系30名球员,询问他们是否愿意对阵以色列,但巴祖努不在其中。他为何被排除在外尚不清楚。联系过的30人不能误认为是投下30张票。⁠25⁠32

两场比赛,均不在主场进行

决定与预定比赛

  1. 2026年9月26日

    在匈牙利经过约四小时讨论后,绝大多数队员投票决定参赛。

    211
  2. 2026年9月27日,19:45 BST

    以色列队名义上的主场比赛计划在匈牙利德布勒森举行。

    20
  3. 2026年10月4日

    爱尔兰队名义上的主场比赛计划在塞尔维亚巴奇卡托波拉举行,闭门进行。

    5052

以色列队名义上的主场比赛原定于9月27日晚7:45(英国夏令时),即世界协调时间18:45,在德布勒森的纳吉德尔体育场举行。现有比赛日程只证实了预定开球时间,并不能说明比赛结果:目前没有确定最终比分,也没有确认比赛是否完成。返场比赛闭门进行的规定,也不能证明德布勒森一役不允许观众入场。⁠20⁠55

爱尔兰队名义上的主场比赛计划于10月4日在巴奇卡托波拉的TSC竞技场举行,而非都柏林的阿维瓦体育场。爱尔兰足球协会表示,磋商发现了在爱尔兰举办比赛的“运营方面的挑战”;欧足联批准了中立场地安排,以及不对观众开放的计划。目前没有证据证实存在任何特定威胁,也没有更详细说明这些挑战。报道称,塞尔维亚这座体育场可容纳4,500人,这是座位容量,并非预计观众人数:比赛将不允许观众入场。爱尔兰队将出国进行名义上的主场比赛,且没有主场观众。⁠50⁠51⁠52

参赛无法解决的问题

爱尔兰球员原计划在9月27日的比赛中佩戴黑色臂章,但目前尚未核实他们是否在场上实际佩戴。现有报道并未说明臂章具体用于纪念什么。爱尔兰反对党政界人士呼吁政府阻止这场比赛。这些立场表明,球队投票决定的是是否参赛,并未解决足球场外或球队内部的争论。⁠17⁠49

这种不安也影响了已宣布的电视转播安排。RTÉ表示,为履行转播义务,它将播出对阵以色列队的比赛,但不会安排自己的演播室节目或评论嘉宾。解说原计划采用国际信号。FRANCE 24英语频道9月27日称转播将不设解说,这一说法因此过于笼统:RTÉ没有自己的解说团队,并不意味着完全没有解说。现有报道证实的是RTÉ的计划,而非最终播出情况。⁠34⁠1

目前,情况很明确:爱尔兰足球协会决定爱尔兰队参赛,巴祖努决定自己不参赛,而哈尔格里姆松表示持异议的球员仍可入选。仍有待查明的是,9月27日的比赛是否如期举行、佩戴臂章和转播安排是否落实,以及10月4日的闭门比赛前,球队是否进一步讨论并改变了任何人的参赛意愿。多数票回答了一个问题——球队是否继续参赛——但其他问题仍未有答案。⁠21⁠5

来源32

在此处引用的来源中,The Independent最先发布,比本报道播出早19小时。 随后还有1家媒体发布。

30家媒体未注明日期:BBC SportRTE.ieThe 42The Irish TimesAl Jazeeraindependent.ie

按媒体查看所有来源

来自 32 家媒体的 58 个来源· 引用最多的优先

播出原貌
  1. Ireland’s squad voted to play Israel, and goalkeeper Gavin Bazunu withdrew from both fixtures. The decision keeps two Nations League matches on the schedule amid calls for a boycott over Israel’s actions in Gaza. It does not settle the disagreement inside the team. Who remains available, and what is actually established about the matches ahead?
  2. The vote followed roughly four hours of squad discussion in Hungary on September 26. That morning, a player had told head coach Heimir Hallgrímsson he was uncomfortable playing and intended to withdraw. Bazunu subsequently identified himself as that player. Football Association of Ireland chief executive David Courell described the vote as a “significant majority”; no numerical division was released. A decision to play was not a unanimous endorsement of the fixture.
  3. Bazunu said he had not reached his decision lightly, that he felt it would be wrong to participate, and that the killing of innocent people is wrong. He referred to atrocities in the region. His refusal covers the upcoming fixtures against Israel; it is his own decision, not a withdrawal by the rest of the squad.
  4. Only one player was expected to miss the September 27 match. Players who voted against playing remained available for selection, and further conversations were planned that night and possibly the following day. Hallgrímsson’s description was stark: “Nobody is comfortable playing this game.” That leaves room for a team to fulfil the fixture without every player agreeing that it should be played.
  5. The number thirty refers to players the association reportedly contacted about facing Israel, not to ballots cast. Bazunu was not among those contacted, and the reason is unknown. One contemporaneous account described two other players as taking a similar position against playing. That does not establish how they voted or that either withdrew: the coach said opponents of playing remained available and only one player would be absent from the next match.
  6. The dispute extends beyond the dressing room. Irish opposition politicians called on the government to stop the fixture. Israel’s football association communications chief Shlomi Barzel responded to the decision to play with the words “football has won” and said Israeli players would offer handshakes before the game. That was an intention, not confirmation of what happened at kickoff. Ireland’s players also planned to wear black armbands. Their use on the pitch, and a specific official explanation of what they would commemorate, have not been established.
  7. Neither designated home match is scheduled in its home country. Israel’s home fixture is set for Nagyerdei Stadion in Debrecen, Hungary. Ireland’s return home fixture has moved from Dublin’s Aviva Stadium to the TSC Arena in Bačka Topola, Serbia. For Ireland, that means playing its own leg abroad without a home crowd.
  8. The Debrecen match was scheduled for September 27 at 7:45 p.m. British Summer Time, or 6:45 p.m. UTC. The available information establishes a scheduled game, not a completed one: there is no verified score or confirmation that it took place. Ireland’s designated home leg is scheduled for October 4 behind closed doors. The Serbian ground has a reported capacity of 4,500, but spectators will not be admitted for that fixture. The October 4 rule must not be assumed to apply to the September 27 match.
  9. The FAI identified “operational challenges” to staging Ireland’s home leg in Ireland after consulting stakeholders. UEFA approved the neutral venue and no-spectator arrangement. No specific threat or fuller explanation for those challenges has been established.
  10. An initial description of a telecast without any commentary was wrong. RTÉ said it would meet its obligation to show the match without its own studio presentation or punditry, but with commentary from an international feed. No RTÉ commentary team does not mean no commentary at all. The actual transmission has not been verified.
  11. The answer to whether the disagreement stops Ireland playing is, for now, no: the squad voted to fulfil both fixtures, Bazunu withdrew, and other dissenting players remained available. What is not established is whether the September 27 match took place, whether the planned armbands or handshakes materialized, or whether further squad talks changed availability before the closed-door October 4 leg.

译文更新于

近期播出