司法 · 朗斯手榴弹伤人事件持续报道 · 第 2 篇，共 2 篇

朗斯学生失去一只手。法国暂停使用手榴弹，但关键问题仍无答案

一名15岁学生左手被截肢，改变了法国学校抗议活动中的警务措施。新出现的影像增加了证据，但既未证实他捡起手榴弹，也未确认弹药型号或明确责任归属。

播出 文字 阅读需 13 分钟202 个来源
与 HeyDex 一起探索

通过 RSS 关注

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

译自英文原文。

持续报道第 10 天

2 篇报道113 家媒体202 个来源37 个视频

完整报道
  • 暂无标注日期的事件
  1. 第 1 次更新法国学校抗议面临双重考验：确保课堂安全并追究警务责任
  2. 第 2 次更新朗斯学生失去一只手。法国暂停使用手榴弹，但关键问题仍无答案当前位置

自上次报道以来的变化

6 天后

当时

法国学校抗议面临双重考验：确保课堂安全并追究警务责任

现在

一名15岁学生左手被截肢，改变了法国学校抗议活动中的警务措施。新出现的影像增加了证据，但既未证实他捡起手榴弹，也未确认弹药型号或明确责任归属。

现已确认

  • 这名学生的左手已被截肢；截至10月7日，他仍在住院；针对高中抗议活动的手榴弹限制措施已获确认。

朗斯一名15岁的学生失去了左手。10月5日，他的学校外发生手榴弹爆炸，外科医生因此为他截肢；他的右手需要植皮，面部和胸部也受了伤。10月7日，他仍在住院。无论调查人员最终查明爆炸原因是什么，这一永久性伤害已经成为事实。170 154

他的母亲否认了他捡起手榴弹的说法，并表示将在数小时内提出申诉。她于10月7日接受BFMTV采访时说，翻译如下：“他们偷走了他的人生。”这是她的说法，不是调查结论。但捡起手榴弹的说法也不是调查结论，而且这一说法传播得比证据所能支持的范围更广。154

法国现已暂停在高中抗议活动中使用一种震撼弹能力，等待情况查明。该限制措施没有设定固定结束日期，但并非全面禁止警方使用手榴弹。造成伤害的具体弹药、爆炸前男孩的手部动作，以及警方这次具体射击是否合法，仍未有定论。123 135 108

10月1日，HeyDay News报道了不断扩大的学校封锁行动、火灾以及对警方可能施暴行为的调查。朗斯学生受伤事件发生在此后，即10月5日星期一。警方于10月6日下达指令，内政部长Laurent Nuñez于10月7日公开说明暂停措施。这是一起新的永久性伤害事件，也带来了具体的警务变化——并非此前全国逮捕人数统计的又一次更新。

学校外发生了什么

省长François-Xavier Lauch称，受伤事件发生于当地时间约10:30，地点在加来海峡省朗斯市奥古斯特-贝阿尔职业高中外。约有200–250名学生聚集。他的说法是，有人向当地警察投掷石块、烟花和迫击炮式烟花，随后一支CRS防暴警察分队被部署到现场。这反映了当局对冲突的描述，并不能证明每名学生都投掷了东西，也不能证明受伤的男孩投掷了东西。115 107

这名男孩住在附近的旺格勒斯，后来被送往里尔治疗。10月6日晚，旺格勒斯市长Sébastien Messent介绍了他的手术、左手截肢、右手植皮以及其他伤势，并表示他接受了镇静治疗且长时间睡眠。Lauch最初称他的生命没有危险，这不应被误解为对其残疾或其他伤势的乐观预后。目前尚未证实有公开医疗记录、出院日期或详细康复评估。170 107

部分报道对伤情的描述有误。FRANCE 24 English于10月6日的节目称，男孩捡起手榴弹后失去了双手；BBC于10月5日最初报道他失去了一只手，并列出相互矛盾的说法。之后的手术情况证实他失去了左手，而非双手。CNN于10月6日报道称，他在试图捡起手榴弹后失去了手部功能；NBC News当天则明确表示，手榴弹是击中他，还是他捡起后爆炸，尚无定论。失去手部功能的说法淡化了已确认的截肢事实；至于捡起手榴弹，仍未得到证实。14 1 170 10 22

争议最初源于警察工会的早期说法。法新社援引一名工会消息人士的话报道，男孩似乎捡起了一枚由防暴警察发射的震爆弹。一名自称当时就在他附近的女孩告诉《北方之声》，他既没有捡起，也没有接住手榴弹。10月5日，贝蒂讷检察官Étienne Thieffry明确表示，尚不能确定他是捡起一枚随后在手中爆炸的手榴弹，还是手榴弹落在他身上。1 119

10月6日晚，Thieffry给出了警方的初步事件经过：警方警告人群解散，有人向CRS警员投掷物品，垃圾桶被点燃，随后警方投掷了催泪弹，接着至少发射了一枚震撼弹。这一重建并未指出是哪种装置造成伤害，也未确定其轨迹；它也没有解决这次具体使用武力是否经过授权且符合比例原则。171 170

缺失关键片段的视频

经franceinfo核实并于10月7日17:16发布的业余拍摄画面增加了证据，但没有给出定论。画面中，一枚手榴弹落在停车场里两名青少年的脚边，身后是一排CRS防暴警察。约十五人组成的人群似乎正在离开，其中第三名青少年俯身向前，伸手靠近手榴弹。108

随后，他离开画面几秒钟。画面中传出爆炸声，之后可以看到他和其他人一起跑开。可见画面没有显示他拿起手榴弹。这一段影像对“手榴弹直接落在他手上”的说法提出质疑，但由于视野缺失，它无法证明爆炸前他的手做了什么。俯身靠近手榴弹，与清楚看到他把手榴弹捡起来，是两种不同的观察。108

Franceinfo于10月7日报道，IGPN调查人员当时尚未拿到这段影像。Culture Infos则称调查人员正在查看影像。因此，影像是否已正式移交尚不能视为定论；截至发布时，franceinfo直接描述的情况是调查人员尚未收到影像。预计很快会对这名男孩进行询问，但未公布日期。108 111

IGPN——法国国家警察总监察局（Inspection générale de la Police nationale），即法国国家警察监督机构——正在调查涉嫌造成永久性残疾或肢体残缺的暴力行为。截至10月7日，事发时手持发射器的CRS警员已作为证人接受询问。他获准在一般情况下使用该武器；调查人员仍需查明是否由他一人发射了震撼弹，以及这次具体发射是否经过授权、符合比例原则且具有正当性。108 110

BBC于10月6日的报道让人以为，一名警员已经因朗斯事件被正式起诉。后来确认的朗斯案件进展是警员接受证人询问，而非被起诉。有关一名警员被正式立案调查的报道，涉及的是圣旺莱奥莫讷另一名学生受伤事件。朗斯调查的启动或武器的停用，都不能证明发生了违法行为。18 108 146

确有其事的限制措施，而非一概禁用

Actu17报道称，国家警察总局局长Louis Laugier于10月6日下达指令，仅在高中抗议活动期间暂停使用“la grenade ASSD (marque Alsetex) projetée par lanceur”——即由发射器发射的Alsetex ASSD手榴弹，直至查明朗斯事件的具体情况。多家报道援引了这一措辞，但尚未核实有公开的电报影印件。135 133

Nuñez于10月7日接受RTL采访时，确认了这一仅针对相关抗议活动、有条件的暂停措施。他称震撼弹可能涉事的可能性很大，但没有作出确切认定。Franceinfo报道称，暂停措施是在周二政府会议后应Emmanuel Macron的要求实施的。催泪瓦斯和其他弹药不在该限制明确规定的范围内。123 130

甚至武器名称也需要谨慎对待。指令中所说的由发射器发射的“ASSD”，与专业网站Maintien de l’ordre对Alsetex ASSD的描述相矛盾：该网站称ASSD只能手掷，不含催泪瓦斯。《世界报》10月7日的报道指出，被暂停使用的发射器弹药是EF-SON，使用时配合Cobra发射器。ASSD、EF-SON、含催泪成分的GM2L以及反包围橡胶弹手榴弹，并非可以互换的名称。公开记录既未消除这一命名差异，也未证实伤害男孩的是哪种型号。135 152 149 129

其他规格说明揭示的是潜在危险，而非朗斯事件中的爆炸情况。RTL转述了专业人士对ASSD的描述：在10米处声压约为160分贝，延迟时间约为1.5秒。报道所称EF-SON的声级也为160分贝；其报告的约80米射程，是指以45度角发射时的发射器弹药，并非手掷ASSD。这些数字都不能确定使用的弹药型号，也不能测算朗斯事件中的发射距离。上述描述记载了严重听力损伤和弹片伤害等风险。“非致命”并不意味着不会造成永久性伤害。129 152 150

人权团体质疑警方对待青少年示威者时是否遵循比例原则；警察工会则认为，警员在遭遇暴力时需要有伤害较小的武力选项。有关投掷物和警告的报道值得调查，但它们既不能说明这名男孩受伤不可避免，也不能预先为此开脱，更不能证明存在刑事定罪。4

奥古斯特-贝阿尔高中于10月5日开始远程教学，并设立专门的倾听热线。10月7日，高年级学生和高中毕业后继续升学的学生部分复课。当天上午，里尔学区负责人Sophie Béjean会见了约200名学生及其教师，并承诺继续举行倾听活动，目标是在数周或数月内恢复正常，而非安排一个固定日期。学生要求增加教师、安排代课、提供教学用品并维护校舍，这些诉求解释了封锁行动的缘由，却无法解释手榴弹造成的伤害。107 189 188 13

已知

  • 这名学生的左手已被截肢；截至10月7日，他仍在住院；针对高中抗议活动的手榴弹限制措施已获确认。 170154123

未知

  • 具体弹药、关键手部动作、弹道轨迹和责任归属仍未有定论。其母亲宣布将提出申诉，但尚未确认已提交。

后续

  • 关注这名学生预计接受询问的进展、调查人员是否收到影像、申诉是否已提交，以及限制措施是否有变化。尚未公布调查完成日期或解除限制的日期。

来源与背景支持材料

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57

58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104

105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172

173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202

播出原貌 29 行
  1. On October 1, we reported police-force inquiries. Now a pupil has lost his left hand. France has withdrawn a stun-grenade capability from high-school protests while investigators establish what happened.
  2. The restriction has no fixed end date, but it is not a general ban on police grenades. What can the evidence establish about the injury—and what remains unresolved about the police shot?
  3. A 15-year-old was injured outside Lycée professionnel Auguste-Béhal in Lens, in northern France. He lives in nearby Wingles and was taken to Lille for treatment after the explosion on October 5.
  4. The injury occurred at about 10:30 local time, with approximately 200 to 250 pupils gathered. The initial deployment account describes stones, fireworks and mortars thrown at local police, followed by a company of CRS riot police. That does not establish that every pupil threw anything, or that the injured boy did.
  5. The pupils' demands concern more teachers, replacement cover, adequate supplies, maintained buildings and less crowded classrooms. Those grievances explain the school blockades. They cannot establish how a grenade caused this pupil's injury.
  6. The boy lost one hand, his left—not both hands. The subsequent amputation also means describing the injury simply as lost use of a hand understates the permanent disability.
  7. He underwent surgery on October 5, received a graft to his right hand, and had wounds to his face and thorax. He was sedated and sleeping extensively afterward, and remained hospitalised on October 7.
  8. His life was initially described as not in danger. That does not diminish the permanent disability or establish a prognosis for his other injuries. No public medical record, verified rehabilitation plan, discharge date or detailed long-term recovery assessment has been established.
  9. His mother rejects the pickup explanation and argues that action came only after her son lost his hand. On October 7, she announced that she would file a complaint within hours. Completion of that filing is not established.
  10. No complaint had yet been filed by the evening of October 6. The next day's announcement changes the family's stated next step; it does not prove that a formal complaint was subsequently lodged.
  11. Neither a pickup nor an intention to throw the grenade back has been established. A nearby witness rejected both pickup and catching it. Competing explanations also describe a projectile fired toward him or landing on him.
  12. The preliminary reconstruction identifies warnings to disperse, projectiles directed at CRS officers and burning bins. Police used tear-gas grenades, followed by at least one stun grenade. It does not identify the device that caused the hand injury.
  13. The precise trajectory and the legality of that particular use of force remain unresolved. The inquiry initially left open whether the boy recovered a grenade that exploded in his hand or whether one landed on him.
  14. Authenticated amateur footage published on October 7 at 17:16 shows a grenade landing on the ground at two teenagers' feet in a car park. A third teenager bends toward it with a hand extended. The visible frames do not show pickup.
  15. A CRS line is visible behind them. The third teenager is among about fifteen apparently moving away. He leaves the frame for a few seconds, a detonation is heard, and he is then seen running with the others. The sequence challenges the explanation that the grenade landed directly on his hand, but the missing view prevents it from proving what his hand did before the explosion.
  16. Investigators' formal receipt of the footage remains unsettled. The directly described position at publication was that the images had not yet reached them. The boy was expected to be interviewed very soon, but no exact date was announced.
  17. The police watchdog, IGPN, is investigating suspected violence causing permanent disability or mutilation. As of October 7, the CRS officer holding the launcher at the relevant moment had been interviewed as a witness. No Lens-specific charge is established.
  18. The officer was authorised to use the launcher. That general authorisation does not determine whether this shot was authorised, proportionate and legitimate. Investigators still need to establish whether he was the only officer to launch a stun grenade. A separate officer's formal investigation concerned another pupil's injury in Saint-Ouen-l'Aumône, not this Lens case. Opening the Lens inquiry does not prove an offence.
  19. The suspension applies only to the high-school protest movement, until the Lens circumstances are clarified. Tear gas and other munitions remain outside its stated scope. The order followed Emmanuel Macron's request after the October 6 government meeting.
  20. The reported instruction names an Alsetex ASSD grenade projected by launcher. That designation conflicts with technical descriptions of ASSD as hand-thrown only. A public facsimile of the instruction has not been verified, and the naming discrepancy remains unresolved.
  21. ASSD, EF-SON, GM2L and rubber-pellet anti-encirclement grenades are not interchangeable names. Earlier explanations suggested GM2L or an anti-encirclement grenade; one witness described an explosion consistent with GM2L. The minister described a strong possibility of a stun grenade—not definitive identification of the model responsible.
  22. The ASSD description gives approximately 160 decibels at 10 metres and a delay of about 1.5 seconds, intended to prevent pickup. The same sound level is reported for EF-SON. It cannot identify which device exploded at Lens.
  23. The hand-thrown ASSD is described as replacing hand-thrown GM2L after that use was prohibited in July 2021 because of danger to officers. GM2L contains tear gas; this ASSD description does not. The alternative launcher-round description identifies EF-SON, approximately 40 millimetres, used with the Cobra launcher and in service from summer 2025.
  24. The approximately 80-metre range at 45 degrees, with a precision margin of about 20 metres, belongs to the EF-SON description—not hand-thrown ASSD. It is not evidence of the distance of the Lens shot.
  25. These are secondary specifications, not independently extracted manufacturer tests or measurements of the explosion. Serious auditory injury and fragments are identified hazards, but the public material does not establish fragment characteristics or wound distances. Calling a weapon non-lethal does not mean it cannot cause permanent injury.
  26. Auguste-Béhal switched to distance learning and opened a dedicated listening line staffed by education professionals on October 5. A partial return was scheduled for October 7 at 10:00, following discussion with some pupils, for final-year and post-baccalaureate students.
  27. That morning, Lille academy rector Sophie Béjean met approximately 200 pupils and their teachers for a discussion requested by the education minister. She announced further listening and school-democracy sessions, and a return in a few weeks or months—not a fixed appointment. The visit did not settle pupils' anger or explain their classmate's injury.
  28. The answer is a permanent injury, a limited restriction and an unfinished investigation. Rights groups question proportionality; police unions defend less-lethal options against violent confrontations. Neither position supplies the missing evidence about this boy or establishes an officer's responsibility.
  29. The boy's anticipated interview, complete imagery and police deployment record remain consequential evidence. No inquiry completion date or fixed date for lifting the restriction has been announced. The family's complaint still requires confirmation. The boy's left-hand amputation is permanent.

来源

202 个来源111 家媒体37 个视频2 篇通稿

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。