司法 · 马杜罗遭起诉
马杜罗和弗洛雷斯面临酷刑共谋指控;法官驳回她的医疗居家拘禁申请
一份解封的起诉书指控这对夫妇建立了一个酷刑和政治镇压体系。弗洛雷斯的羁押申请已有裁决;证据、豁免权和治疗可及性问题仍未解决。
原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载
译自英文原文。
新闻追踪第 4 天
1 篇报道40 家媒体56 个来源3 个视频
对尼古拉斯·马杜罗和西莉亚·弗洛雷斯的起诉,若从毒品和武器指控扩大到涉嫌存在的国家酷刑体系,会带来哪些变化?如今,指控涉及的不仅是非法贩运,还包括据称维持权力的方式:通过安全部门、羁押期间的虐待,以及对囚犯家属的威胁。
2026年10月8日,曼哈顿一份追加起诉书解封,指控两名被告共谋实施酷刑。联邦大陪审团投票决定提出这项新指控。同一天,法官阿尔文·海勒斯坦驳回了弗洛雷斯的保释申请和出于医疗原因提出的居家拘禁申请。检方扩大了起诉范围;她要求改变羁押方式的申请则遭拒。这两项进展都不能证明被告有罪。11 4 22 23
马杜罗和弗洛雷斯否认有不当行为,并已在现有的美国毒品案中作出不认罪答辩。这不等于他们已就新增的酷刑指控作出经过核实的不认罪答辩。完整起诉书、医疗记录和完整书面裁决均无法供人独立审查,因此,有关指控和羁押裁决能够确认的情况仍存在重要限制。3
指控直指体系的设计者
据NPR对起诉书的描述,马杜罗涉嫌授权对特定人员施以酷刑,并监督一个利用酷刑、任意拘押和暴力镇压政治反对派的体系。NBC报道称,一场据称持续约十年的行动针对反对其政府的人士,包括异见人士和美国公民。其确切起止日期尚未得到核实。3 4
据称弗洛雷斯所扮演的角色则有所不同。ABC报道称,检方指控她帮助马杜罗设计酷刑和镇压体系。她并非仅因与丈夫的关系而被起诉:指控称她参与构建了这一体系。检方能否证明她参与其中,是审理过程中需要回答的问题,并非起诉书已经给出的结论。1
据称使用的手段包括电击、殴打、窒息、水刑式虐待和模拟处决。福克斯新闻的报道还提到强奸和断粮的指控,但没有确认哪些受害者据称遭受了这些行为。这些报道并不意味着每名所谓受害者都经历了所列的每一种手段。3 4 14
据称,胁迫手段还波及囚犯本人以外的人。NPR报道称,指控称马杜罗曾亲自威胁要杀害一名囚犯的孩子,以实施心理酷刑;NBC则报道了针对家属的威胁,包括儿童。检方的说法因此还涉及利用伤害羁押场所外人员的可能性,恐吓身处羁押中的人。这些威胁仍属指控。3 4
在案件相关报道中,委内瑞拉军事反情报机构DGCIM也被提及。现有材料并未说明其完整的行动责任链。提及某个机构,并不等于证明某项命令如何传达到具体官员,或任一被告如何参与某一具体行为。3
不可合并的三项指控
美国人的身份仍未公开,报道中的人数也需要谨慎解读。10月8日,ABC新闻称至少有两名美国人被列为受害者7号和8号。当天下午,NPR的报道则称,涉嫌受害者中有三名身份未公开的美国公民。“至少两人”是指最低人数,并非断言恰好有两人,因此两种说法未必相互矛盾。不过,受害者编号以及美国受害者的总人数仍未经过独立核实并厘清。1 3
ABC称,这些美国人因被指策划刺杀马杜罗而遭拘押,被带到一处“水泥房”并受到酷刑,包括遭受电击。这一说法并不能证明刺杀阴谋确实存在。据称,受害者7号于2022年1月遭受酷刑,数月后获释;其身份和确切获释日期均未得到证实。1
公开起诉书公布前,报道中曾出现另一组数字。10月7日,CNN报道说,预计将提出的指控涉及十多名被错误拘押的美国人,CBS新闻独立证实了这一报道。BBC新闻当晚援引CBS报道称,可能还会对其他人提出指控。此前报道所指的范围,并非已确认的10月8日起诉书中明确列出的美国受害者人数。它可能涉及范围更广的调查,但这一解释尚未得到证实。这些数字不能相加,也不能据此认定受害者人数已被证明有所增加或减少。6 8 5
程序上的不确定性确实发生了变化。10月7日的报道说预计将提出指控;10月8日,一份起诉书解封。马杜罗的律师巴里·波拉克此前告诉CBS,他没有收到新增指控的通知。这只是他当时所知情况的陈述,并不能证明目前存在披露程序上的缺陷。ABC在10月8日早些时候发布报道时,马杜罗缺席庭审,原本预计将接受提审,但目前无法确认新的确切提审日期,也无法确认提审已经完成。进一步追加被告仍有可能,但尚无已确认的起诉文件。5 1 4
羁押安排已裁定,医疗护理问题仍未解决
69岁的弗洛雷斯被关押在布鲁克林的大都会拘留中心。她的律师提议将她居家拘禁在纽约一处住所,并安排全天候警卫;据报道,其他条件还包括GPS监控和安全限制。他们申请的是在监狱外接受监督的拘禁,而非不受限制地获释。3 52
她的律师称,她在羁押期间体重减轻了25磅,约合11公斤,且7月可能曾轻微心脏病发作。他们提到了心脏问题和可能需要手术。NBC关于医疗情况的报道称,医生建议进行心脏导管检查,之后可能还需采取更具侵入性的治疗措施。以上说法均未得到独立证实,既不能确认她曾心脏病发作,也不能确定她一定需要手术,或证实她已经接受导管检查。3 29
检方反对释放,认为弗洛雷斯有极高的潜逃风险,并会对公众构成危险。检方还称,需要治疗时她已被送往医院。TeleSUR、CiberCuba和Infobae在庭审后的报道确认,海勒斯坦于10月8日驳回了保释和审前居家拘禁申请;此前NBC和NPR的报道没有提及裁决。3 22 23 54
一份后续摘要称,驳回申请的理由是潜逃风险和指控的严重性,但法官的原话和完整理由尚不可得。目前也无法确认裁决是否附带任何具体的医疗治疗指示。55
法律障碍仍未解决
现有指控包括共谋实施毒品恐怖主义、共谋输入可卡因、持有机关枪和破坏性装置,以及共谋持有这些武器。BBC报道称,美军于1月3日夜间突袭这对夫妇在加拉加斯的住所,将两人抓获并带到纽约;该报道没有明确说明年份。这份新起诉书并未解决围绕两人被抓获或遭起诉所产生的争议。5
辩方以豁免权为由寻求撤销案件,主张马杜罗和弗洛雷斯分别以外国领导人和第一夫人的身份受到保护。检方反对这一主张,但目前尚无裁决确认或驳回豁免权或撤案申请。ABC的一位法律分析人士认为,美国承认德尔西·罗德里格斯而非马杜罗,可能削弱辩方主张。具体的承认声明及其法律影响尚未经过独立核实。司法部将马杜罗称为前总统,这一说法本身并不能解决豁免权问题。3 24 1 11
对亚历克斯·萨博的合作情况也应适度看待。司法部确认,这名马杜罗的关系人士于2026年9月15日承认参与一项洗钱计划,该计划涉及贿赂以及食品和药品公共合同。《迈阿密先驱报》报道称,他同意配合调查;Venezuelanalysis称,检方有条件地建议减刑。完整协议未经过独立审查,尚无证据表明减刑已经获批,现有信息也不能证明萨博提供了酷刑指控的依据。41 46 49
未知
- 新指控的提审日期、豁免权问题的裁定、完整的羁押裁决理由,以及任何具体的医疗治疗安排,目前均未得到确认。
后续
- 关注预计于2026年10月13日公布的书面羁押裁决,以及新起诉书是否会改变现有审判日程。
DiarioVea报道称,羁押裁决将于次周星期二,即10月13日公布;但没有经过独立审查的日程安排命令能够保证这一日期。路透社报道,根据2026年7月22日的一项裁决,现有案件的审判定于2027年6月1日举行。该日程早于酷刑指控的提出。目前尚未确定针对新指控的单独审判日期,也没有证实现有审判日期已发生变化。接下来的关键考验是法院的完整裁决理由、法院如何处理豁免权,以及检方实际上能够证明哪些证据。56 27
来源
播出原貌 28 行
- U.S. prosecutors now charge Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores with conspiring to commit torture.
- The accusation reaches political opponents and unnamed Americans, expanding a prosecution already built on drug and weapons allegations. Flores has also lost her bid for medical house arrest.
- What do the new charge and the custody ruling change—and what remains unresolved before trial?
- Flores is accused of helping design the infrastructure of torture and repression—not simply of being married to Maduro. Her name is Cilia, not Celia. Both defendants deny wrongdoing, and neither has been convicted of these alleged acts.
- The superseding indictment was unsealed in Manhattan on October 8, 2026, after a federal grand jury voted to bring the new charge. It adds conspiracy to commit torture. The complete indictment and full written rulings were unavailable for independent examination, limiting what can be established about individual allegations and the court’s reasoning.
- On October 7, the charges were still expected, possibly the next day. On October 8, the accusation became a filed indictment. The possibility of charges against additional people remains only a possibility; no further defendant or filing date is established.
- Maduro was absent from court when the early October 8 account appeared and was expected to be arraigned on the new charge. No exact arraignment date or completed arraignment is established. His lawyer’s October 7 statement that he had received no notice described that earlier moment, not a proven current disclosure problem.
- U.S. forces seized Maduro and Flores from their Caracas compound in a nighttime raid on January 3 and brought them to New York. The available account does not specify the year. The new indictment does not resolve disputes surrounding that seizure.
- Maduro allegedly authorized torture against particular individuals and oversaw internal security services using arbitrary detention, violence and torture against people who opposed his government. The alleged campaign spans roughly a decade, but its precise endpoints are unverified. Venezuela’s military counterintelligence agency, DGCIM, is cited; its complete operational chain of responsibility is not established.
- The alleged methods include electric shocks, beatings, asphyxiation, drowning-type abuse and mock executions. The accusations also include rape and starvation, but the available material does not establish which victims experienced those acts—or that every victim experienced every listed method.
- The allegations extend to prisoners’ families, including children. One says Maduro personally threatened to kill a prisoner’s child as psychological torture. That accusation concerns using the prospect of harm to someone outside custody to intimidate a prisoner. It remains an allegation, not a finding that the threat occurred.
- Victims identified as seven and eight remain unnamed. Americans were allegedly detained on claims they plotted to assassinate Maduro, taken to a “concrete house,” and tortured, including with electric shocks. That does not establish an assassination plot existed. Victim seven was allegedly tortured in January 2022 and released months later; the exact release date is unknown.
- At least two Americans is a minimum, not an exact total. A later account describes three unnamed U.S. citizens. The earlier expectation concerned more than a dozen wrongfully detained Americans, but that is not an established American-victim count for the unsealed indictment.
- The minimum of two does not necessarily contradict three. But the numbered victims and the complete American-victim count have not been independently reconciled. The earlier figure could concern a broader investigation; that explanation is unproven. These figures must not be added together, or treated as a confirmed increase or decrease in victims.
- Barry Pollack represents Maduro. The defense seeks dismissal, arguing that Maduro and Flores are protected as a foreign leader and first lady. Delcy Rodríguez figures in the recognition dispute, but no ruling granting or rejecting immunity or dismissal is established.
- The suggested legal obstacle to immunity is that the United States recognizes Rodríguez rather than Maduro. The exact recognition statement and its legal implications have not been independently established. Venezuelan authorities are also described as seeking immunity for Rodríguez, but not Maduro. That contrast does not itself establish U.S. recognition or settle either defendant’s protection.
- Prosecutors oppose immunity, while the defendants have pleaded not guilty in the existing drug case. Those pleas must not be treated as verified pleas to the new torture charge. The earlier allegations include narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine-importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess those weapons. None is an established conviction here.
- Alex Saab pleaded guilty on September 15, 2026, to a money-laundering scheme involving bribery and public contracts for food and medicine. He has been described as Maduro’s business partner and financial front person, making his potential cooperation consequential—but not proof of this accusation.
- The described cooperation arrangement includes a prosecution recommendation for a reduced sentence if Saab’s assistance in cases against other Venezuelan officials proves valuable. Its full terms have not been independently examined. A recommendation is not an awarded reduction, and no established connection shows Saab supplied the basis for the torture charge or identifies testimony he would give about it.
- Flores, 69, is held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. Her lawyers sought a New York residence under 24-hour guard for medical care, with proposed GPS monitoring and security restrictions. They were seeking supervised house arrest, not unrestricted release.
- The defense’s medical claims include a loss of 25 pounds—about 11 kilograms—in detention, chest pain, arrhythmias and other heart problems. They include a possible minor heart attack in July and the possibility of heart surgery. Medical records were unavailable for independent confirmation; these claims do not establish that a heart attack occurred.
- The requested care includes a recommended cardiac catheterization that could lead to more invasive procedures. Multiple prescribed medications are also described, including medication for a potential heart attack. Neither a completed catheterization nor a definite need for surgery is established.
- Prosecutors opposed release, arguing that Flores presented an extreme flight risk and a danger to the public. They also maintained that she had been taken to a hospital for treatment when needed. Those positions are distinct from a judicial determination of what medical care she requires.
- Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied bail and pretrial house arrest on October 8. Earlier accounts without a ruling are overtaken by that denial. Flight risk and the seriousness of the charges are described as reasons, but his exact words and complete reasoning are unavailable.
- No specific medical-treatment directive accompanying the denial is established. Refusing home confinement does not answer whether every requested examination or procedure will be provided in detention. The medical concerns remain separate from the unproven criminal allegations.
- The immediate answer is an expanded prosecution and continued detention rather than the requested home confinement—not a conviction, an immunity ruling or a settled treatment plan. What remains unresolved is the evidence supporting the torture charge, the new arraignment, the dismissal arguments and the full custody decision.
- A written custody decision is expected October 13, 2026, but no independently examined scheduling order guarantees publication. The existing case’s trial was scheduled for June 1, 2027, in a July 22, 2026 decision—before the new indictment.
- No separate trial schedule for the torture accusation is established, and it remains unknown whether that accusation will be covered by the existing schedule or whether the June 1 date will change.
来源
56 个来源40 家媒体3 个视频2 篇通稿
来源地图
追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联;下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。
来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。
译文更新于
修订记录
- r1首次发布。
