跳到内容
现在

报道

两架无人机飞向利雅得。市内遭到命中尚未得到证实

沙特领导的联军报告称，拦截了两架飞向利雅得地区的无人机，以及两枚飞向海米斯穆谢特的导弹。一名胡塞武装官员警告称局势可能进一步升级，但首都遭到命中以及这波袭击的伤亡情况均未得到确认。

文字 阅读需 4 分钟 · 141 个来源

HeyDex

原语言视频

译自英文原文。

两架无人机：这是沙特首都于周六遭袭报道背后的数量。沙特领导的联军称，2026年9月26日，两架无人机飞向利雅得地区时，其防空系统将它们拦截并摧毁。这是一次针对首都方向的袭击企图，并非已证实的市内命中。彭博电视台对首都遇袭的简短描述没有区分这两者，也没有指出目标、伤亡或损失。⁠12⁠1

同一夜间袭击潮还对海米斯穆谢特构成了另一项威胁。联军报告称，拦截了飞向这座沙特城市的弹道导弹；该城市并非利雅得。最终报告的数量是两枚导弹。每件武器飞向何处至关重要：把它们笼统地合并为对首都的袭击，就会把瞄准其他地点的导弹变成利雅得遭袭的证据。⁠2⁠13

联军9月26日发布的公告

  1. 沙特时间03:59

    联军发言人、少将图尔基·马利基宣布，两架飞向利雅得地区的无人机已被拦截并摧毁。

    212
  2. 沙特时间04:25

    马利基宣布，一枚飞向海米斯穆谢特的弹道导弹被拦截。

    89
  3. 9月26日晚些时候

    报道称，第二枚飞向海米斯穆谢特的导弹也被拦截，使该地的拦截数量增至两枚。

    13

这些清晨时段标记的是公告发布时间，而非经独立测定的发射或拦截时间。马利基首次谈及导弹时称拦截了一枚；另一枚是通过后续报道中对联军另一项公告的报道才被纳入叙述，并非重新解读第一项公告所得。联军关于无人机的声明提到了利雅得地区，但没有指出首都内的具体地点。声明没有指明机场、宫殿、石油设施或其他预定目标。⁠89⁠13⁠3

关于被拦截武器的说法来自沙特领导的联军。现有报道没有独立证实利雅得发生了撞击，也没有确定这波袭击造成的人员伤亡或财产损失。没有确认伤亡数字，也不能证明坠落残骸没有伤及任何人。一个实际问题仍未得到解答：据称发生拦截之后，地面上究竟发生了什么，如果有的话？⁠12⁠3

拦截之后的威胁

军事方面的说法以武器被摧毁告终，政治表态却没有停止。9月26日，胡塞武装政治局成员希扎姆·阿萨德将当晚的行动称为全面升级前的一次小规模演练。他还称行动具有力量、打击范围和效果。这些是他对行动的说法，并不能证明任何一架无人机抵达目标，或在利雅得造成损失。目前尚未确认有胡塞武装军事发言人发表经过核实的声明，具体宣称9月26日成功袭击了利雅得某个具名目标。⁠106⁠14

海湾阿拉伯国家合作委员会秘书长贾西姆·穆罕默德·阿尔布达维谴责了当天针对利雅得和海米斯穆谢特的袭击。他称，局势升级侵犯了沙特主权，并威胁平民安全和地区稳定。他谴责的是袭击企图；他的表态没有提供伤亡数字，也没有确认首都遭到命中。⁠6⁠5

这一差别很容易被忽略，因为利雅得曾出现在此前的报道中。9月19日，沙特称拦截了一枚飞向首都的弹道导弹，当时有报道称机场附近出现烟雾和火焰。现有报道并未证实火灾是由被拦截的导弹造成的。9月24日，联军报告称拦截了六枚飞向塔伊夫和延布地区的导弹；胡塞武装当时的说法也提及利雅得和延布。这些此前的报道均未指出9月26日无人机的预定目标。⁠28⁠26⁠40⁠47

现有说法能够确认的内容

称一座城市遭到袭击，与称防御系统报告拦截了飞向该市周边地区的武器，两者有着重大区别。前一种说法可能让读者以为某条街道或一栋建筑遭到打击。这里，联军的具体说法是，两架飞往利雅得地区的无人机被拦截；此外，还有两枚飞向海米斯穆谢特的导弹被拦截的报道。这些说法没有确定利雅得的任何具体目标，也没有证实市内遭到袭击。准确表述并不会淡化威胁，而是避免把威胁误当成已确认的结果。⁠12⁠13

已知

  • 联军报告称，拦截了两架飞向利雅得地区的无人机；在随后发布的公告中，还报告称拦截了两枚飞向海米斯穆谢特的导弹。 1213

未知

  • 无人机原本瞄准的地点，以及任何残骸是否在地面造成伤害，仍未确定。

后续

  • 阿萨德所警告的更大范围升级是否会发生，仍待观察。

目前，有关9月26日事件得到支持的结论是报告称发生了一系列拦截，而不是利雅得遭到有记录的命中。阿萨德的警告并未排除胡塞武装接下来可能采取何种行动；但它也无法确定这些武器的遭遇，或它们飞行路径下方人员的情况。要声称发生了财产损失、人员受伤或存在具体目标，都需要相关证据，而公告及后续报道并未提供这些证据。⁠3⁠106

来源102

在此处引用的来源中，Bloomberg Television最先发布，比本报道播出早5小时。
  1. Bloomberg Television
  2. HeyDay News

101家媒体未注明日期：Unnamed channelSaudiPressAgencyX (formerly Twitter)aawsat.comAl JazeeraReuters

按媒体查看所有来源

来自 102 家媒体的 141 个来源· 引用最多的优先

播出原貌
  1. Two Houthi drones headed toward the Riyadh area, and Saudi air defenses intercepted them. The same overnight wave brought ballistic missiles toward another Saudi city. A Houthi official then warned of wider escalation. Was Riyadh actually struck, and is there evidence of harm on the ground?
  2. The weapons were headed for different Saudi destinations. Saturday was September 26, 2026. Describing that night simply as an attack on Saudi Arabia’s capital risks suggesting a hit in the city. The more precise account is two drones headed toward the Riyadh area, while the missiles were headed toward Khamis Mushait—not Riyadh.
  3. At about 3:59 a.m. Saudi time—12:59 a.m. UTC—Major General Turki al-Malki announced the two drone interceptions. At about 4:25 a.m. Saudi time, or 1:25 UTC, he announced one intercepted ballistic missile. A later announcement brought the reported Khamis Mushait total to two. The first missile announcement did not itself count two. These are announcement times, not independently measured times of launch, interception or debris landing. One account places the drone interception on Friday; the early-Saturday announcements cannot, by themselves, establish its exact time.
  4. The September 26 drones have no established target within Riyadh. An airport, a palace and an oil facility have each been suggested elsewhere in accounts of Riyadh attacks, but none is established as the intended target of these two drones. Separate incidents help explain the confusion: on September 19, a ballistic missile was reported intercepted toward Riyadh, and smoke and fire were seen near its airport. A link between that missile and the fire was not established. On September 24, six missiles were reported intercepted toward Taif and the Yanbu area; Houthi claims about Riyadh and Yanbu from that period do not identify a target for the September 26 drones.
  5. Hezam al-Assad characterized that night’s operation as a small-scale rehearsal for comprehensive escalation. His assertion that it had strength, reach and effect does not establish that anything hit Riyadh or caused damage. No verified statement from a Houthi military spokesman specifically claiming a successful September 26 strike on a named Riyadh target has been established.
  6. The interception account has no independent confirmation of an impact in Riyadh. No official account in the available record confirms a ground impact, casualties or property damage from this wave. That does not prove no one was hurt or that no wreckage caused harm; it means a toll has not been established.
  7. On September 26, Gulf Cooperation Council Secretary-General Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi condemned the attacks toward Riyadh and Khamis Mushait as a violation of Saudi sovereignty and a threat to civilian safety and regional stability. So the answer is an attempted strike toward the Riyadh area, not a verified hit in the capital. The precise intended target, any harm on the ground and whether the threatened wider escalation follows remain unknown.

译文更新于

近期播出