司法 · 安德鲁搜查令之争为何一名嫌疑人要起诉搜查其住所的警方？文字 2026年10月6日 UTC 20:29观看文字实录0:09Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is challenging in court the warrants police used to0:13search his homes.0:14He was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, and he has been neither0:19charged nor cleared.0:20If he wins, materials seized in the searches could become inadmissible, though0:25police could appeal.0:26So what does Thursday's hearing actually decide?0:29And what is still unknown?0:30An old Bailey judge issued the warrants on 18th of February.0:33He was arrested the next day, his 66th birthday, questioned under caution for 110:38hours, then released under investigation.0:40Nearly eight months later, his claim to quash those warrants is before the High0:43Court.0:44Detectives searched two homes.0:45His residence on the Sandringham estate, also reported as Marsh Farm and Royal Lodge0:50in Windsor.0:51The allegation is that as UK trade envoy, he shared sensitive information with0:55Jeffrey Epstein.0:56He has always denied wrongdoing.0:58The force that arrested him is the other side of this case.1:01Its investigation continues, and it is also asking the court to restrict access to1:05certain documents, arguing that release could affect that investigation.1:09The accounts differ, Thursday or around the ninth, the judicial review, or the1:14release of documents.1:16The better supported reading is one Thursday hearing on document restrictions.1:20That is an inference, not a confirmed fact.1:23At 2 p.m.1:24Thursday, mister Justice Nicholas Hilliard, who did not issue the warrants, hears1:28the application on document restrictions, in private, at least at the start.1:33It is not the full review.1:35Media may be heard if restrictions are contemplated.1:37Whether Andrew attends is unknown.1:40No court has found the warrants unlawful.1:42A judge granted permission for the review earlier this year, which means only that1:45the claim is arguable.1:47His legal team say the warrants were not lawful, but the grounds are not public and1:51no statement from his lawyers has been published.1:53Nobody has named who is paying for a high court challenge.1:56Buckingham Palace says none of it comes from the king's allocation to Andrew and2:00that the king has no role in the legal strategy.2:02Taxpayer funding is not involved.2:05Thursday addresses only the police application to restrict court documents.2:09It is fairly unusual for the subject of an investigation to challenge its handling2:13and his arrest.2:14Still unknown, the legal grounds, the funder when the full review is heard, and2:18whether the investigation ends in a charge or no further action.阅读文章事件时间线HeyDex短视频 ↗谁报道了什么多家媒体报道的要点Andrew’s arrest on suspicion of misconduct8 家媒体✓High Court ruling on the warrants’ legality已独立证实 · 7 家媒体✓Police effort to retain seized material已独立证实 · 6 家媒体Allegations involving information shared with Epstein6 家媒体Properties searched on the day of arrest6 家媒体Andrew’s legal challenge to the searches5 家媒体✓Whether the police investigation is ongoing已独立证实 · 5 家媒体✓Effect of quashing warrants on investigation已独立证实 · 4 家媒体Judge’s finding of significant warrant error3 家媒体Scheduled High Court hearing3 家媒体Date the properties were searched3 家媒体Possible effect on use of evidence3 家媒体Legal action against police over arrest2 家媒体Police agreement with the court’s ruling2 家媒体Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has begun legal proceedings against Thames Valley Police.2 家媒体Warrants quashed for two properties2 家媒体Police statement on proceedings and investigation2 家媒体Legal provision required for the warrants2 家媒体Agreement that the warrants were unlawful2 家媒体Custody of material during the legal challenge2 家媒体Uncertainty over return or retention of seized material2 家媒体仅一家媒体报道的要点3仅BBC News报道Police acceptance of the warrant error10月8日 14:13 UTCTiming of the warrants being quashed10月8日 17:00 UTC仅ITV News报道Andrew’s legal team’s view of the warrants10月5日 18:07 UTC每一行都是我们从该媒体报道中记录的说法。比较截至 2026年10月9日 UTC 20:12。
