• Sourcing2 transcripts collected, 1 new arrival
  • DevelopingMacklemore begins Free Palestine tour with sold-out Dublin show — 3 sources
  • DevelopingFriend says Lamarre-Condon tried to change account of alleged confession, court hears — 5 sources
  • DevelopingUkraine’s projected €70bn funding gap becomes politically entangled with EU budget talks — 2 sources
  • DevelopingApple foldable phone starts near $2,000 as launch draws long lines — 6 sources
  • Sourcing3 transcripts collected, 2 new arrivals
  • New storyMontreal man says authorities seek to seize his pet raccoon
  • DevelopingQatar’s emir meets Iran’s Pezeshkian in Moscow — 2 sources
  • New storyGround broken on 96-home affordable housing project in northwest Edmonton
  • RenderingJafarabad gas explosion kills four; two arrested over sewer excavation

Politics · Milton mayoral election

Minakakis reported winner in Milton, ending Krantz’s 46-year mayoral run

All 38 polls reported put George Minakakis nearly 20 points ahead of Gord Krantz. The official declaration remains unverified, and published turnout figures conflict.

Aired Written 4 min read20 sourcesHeyDay News Desk · About usWatch report

Follow via RSS

Transcript · LOADING

Story trackerDay 2

1 report12 outlets20 sources1 video

Is Milton about to change mayors for the first time in 46 years? The complete unofficial count says yes: George Minakakis has been reported the winner of the October 26, 2026 election, with a lead of nearly 20 percentage points over Gord Krantz. What remains unverified is the Town Clerk’s formal declaration—not whether the published election-night figures show a substantial gap. 1 5 16

That distinction matters in an election pointing to the end of an extraordinary tenure. Krantz first won the mayoralty in 1980, after serving on council from 1965 to 1980. He entered this contest after 15 consecutive mayoral terms, described by Global Toronto as Canada’s longest-serving mayor. Minakakis, already a Milton councillor, is the reported successor. 1

Key facts

  1. 20,262Minakakis votes, unofficial 515
  2. 11,398Krantz votes, unofficial 16
  3. 19.8 pointsCalculated lead from published shares 516

MiltonIQ’s all-polls-counted report puts Minakakis at 45.2 per cent of the mayoral vote, with all 38 polls reported. The Milton Record publishes Krantz’s tally as 11,398 votes, or 25.4 per cent, explicitly labelled unofficial and recorded from the Town’s results page on October 26 at 9:59 p.m. Together, those figures produce an 8,864-vote margin. 5 16

The result is a decisive reported plurality, not an outright majority. Minakakis’s 45.2 per cent is the largest reported share, but remains below half the votes in the contest. And the roughly 20-point lead measures the difference between the candidates’ shares; it does not mean Minakakis received only 20 per cent more votes than Krantz.

Earlier election-night numbers were smaller because the count was incomplete. INhalton reported Minakakis on 16,112 votes and Krantz on 8,878 with 31 of 38 polls reporting. The later all-polls-counted account supersedes that snapshot. These are successive stages of the count, not competing final results. 7 5

A change at two council tables

The reported victory would change more than the name at the head of Milton Town Council. The mayor also sits on Halton Regional Council, giving the office a role at both municipal levels. Minakakis would therefore replace Krantz in an office with responsibilities extending beyond the town council chamber. 5

The length of Krantz’s service gives this transition its weight. His council years and mayoralty span more than six decades. But longevity alone does not explain an election result, and the totals do not establish why residents chose another candidate or which policies Minakakis will pursue. The supported conclusion is narrower: the published count points to voters choosing a different mayor after 46 years under Krantz. 1 5

Global Toronto’s account that Krantz trailed by about 20 points with all polls reporting is consistent with Global News’s separate broadcast report that he had lost. One describes the margin; the other states the reported outcome. Neither account, by itself, establishes that the Clerk had issued the official declaration. 1 2

The turnout numbers do not agree

The participation record is less clear than the reported winner. MiltonIQ’s October 26 report gives 44,995 ballots cast among 110,513 eligible electors, producing turnout of 40.71 per cent. FM101’s October 27 morning report repeats the ballot count and turnout rate while still describing the results as unofficial. 5 15

The Association of Municipalities of Ontario’s election entries give a different account: 37,525 voters and 33.96 per cent turnout, using the same 110,513 eligible electors. That leaves a difference of 7,470 between the published voter or ballot counts and 6.75 percentage points between the turnout rates. Neither account has been established here as the reconciled, certified participation total. 4 13 15

Both percentages fit their respective participation counts after rounding. Arithmetic therefore cannot settle which count is correct, or explain why the accounts differ. The discrepancy needs a Town reconciliation, not a guess about timing or counting methods. It concerns participation; it does not provide evidence that the reported mayoral winner changed.

A separate distinction should not be mistaken for that conflict. MiltonIQ gives 44,825 votes in the mayoral contest and 44,995 ballots cast townwide. The candidate shares use the mayoral total, not the overall ballot count. Those figures measure different things, and the available account does not explain the difference between them. 5

What the official declaration must settle

Before election day, the Town said residents could vote on October 26 from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m., with official results to be released by the Clerk on Tuesday, October 27. That was an explicit publication commitment, but it is not evidence that the release occurred. FM101’s October 27 report still called the figures unofficial at 7:31 a.m.; a completed declaration has not been verified for this report. 20 15

That verification gap should not be inflated into a claim that certification failed or that the election is being contested. The outstanding documents would confirm or correct the published candidate totals and margin, and an official turnout reconciliation would resolve the separate participation dispute.

The new council term is scheduled to begin November 15, according to MiltonIQ, citing a Town staff report. For now, the evidence supports a reported Minakakis victory and the end of Krantz’s long run of mayoral election wins. The political change is substantial; the formal result and precise participation record still need confirmation. 5

As aired 17 lines
  1. George Minakakis leads Gord Krantz by almost twenty percentage points.
  2. With all thirty-eight polls reported, the unofficial result points to Milton's first new mayor in forty-six years. The change would affect representation on both town and regional councils.
  3. The remaining uncertainty concerns the formal declaration and conflicting turnout figures that differ by thousands.
  4. Milton's mayor heads Town Council and also sits on Halton Regional Council. So the reported victory would give Minakakis a role at both levels of municipal government, replacing an incumbent first elected mayor in 1980.
  5. Residents voted on October twenty-sixth, 2026, with polls open from ten in the morning until eight that evening. The completed unofficial count puts Minakakis well ahead of Krantz, with a gap of eight thousand, eight hundred and sixty-four votes.
  6. Minakakis has twenty thousand, two hundred and sixty-two votes, or forty-five point two percent. Krantz has eleven thousand, three hundred and ninety-eight, or twenty-five point four percent. Those unofficial shares put the gap at nineteen point eight percentage points, rounded to twenty.
  7. Minakakis's forty-five point two percent falls short of an outright majority. He has the reported winning plurality, meaning the largest share of votes. And the roughly twenty-point lead measures the difference between the candidates' shares of the mayoral vote.
  8. The mayoral shares use forty-four thousand, eight hundred and twenty-five votes cast in that contest. The separate townwide count is forty-four thousand, nine hundred and ninety-five ballots. Those figures count different things, so the candidate percentages use the mayoral total.
  9. The earlier count was smaller because seven polls were still outstanding. With thirty-one of thirty-eight polls reporting, Minakakis had sixteen thousand, one hundred and twelve votes. Krantz had eight thousand, eight hundred and seventy-eight. The later, complete poll count replaces that election-night snapshot.
  10. Minakakis was already serving as a Milton councillor when he challenged Krantz. Krantz entered the race as Canada's longest-serving mayor. His run in municipal office stretches beyond his forty-six years leading the town.
  11. Krantz served on council from 1965 until 1980, then won the mayoralty. He went into this election after fifteen consecutive mayoral terms. Together, his council service and time as mayor span more than six decades.
  12. The participation figures present a separate problem. One total puts turnout above forty percent. Another puts it below thirty-four percent. The difference is large enough that either figure needs a clear qualification whenever it's used.
  13. The published figures range from forty-four thousand, nine hundred and ninety-five ballots and forty point seven one percent turnout, to thirty-seven thousand, five hundred and twenty-five voters and thirty-three point nine six percent turnout. The participation total remains unsettled.
  14. Both calculations use the same pool of one hundred and ten thousand, five hundred and thirteen eligible electors. Both percentages fit their respective participation counts after rounding. But the counts differ by seven thousand, four hundred and seventy, and the rates differ by six point seven five percentage points.
  15. The arithmetic can't explain which participation count is correct, or why they differ. That discrepancy concerns turnout. The unofficial candidate totals still put Minakakis ahead of Krantz by nearly twenty points.
  16. The Town said its Clerk would release official results on October twenty-seventh. The figures were still described as unofficial that morning. It isn't clear whether the Clerk has since issued the formal declaration.
  17. The complete unofficial poll count points to a Minakakis victory, ending Krantz's run of mayoral election wins. The Clerk's official totals would confirm or correct the eight-thousand, eight-hundred-and-sixty-four-vote margin. The new council term is scheduled to begin November fifteenth, 2026.

Sources

20 sources12 outlets1 video

Source map

Follow the evidence behind this report. The map shows its connections; the links below open the sources cited in this article.

Source map loads as you read.

Explore the full newsroom map ↗

Revision log

  1. r1First published.