Conflictos · Ataques contra aeropuertos saudíesNoticia en seguimiento · informe 1 de 2
Tres muertos en aeropuertos saudíes mientras nuevos ataques alteran los vuelos de Riad
Las autoridades saudíes documentan tres civiles muertos y 36 heridos en los ataques contra aeropuertos del 6 y 7 de octubre. Las nuevas explosiones y las amplias alteraciones de vuelos muestran que el intercambio no ha terminado.
Vídeo en su idioma original

Transcripción · CARGANDO
Traducido del original en inglés.
Noticia en seguimientoDía 5
2 informes191 medios374 fuentes55 vídeos
Toda la noticiaSeguimiento de nuestro último informe
La causa del incendio de Riad, cualquier daño en Khurais y si el Gobierno saudí o Aramco dirán algo sobre los daños.
Sigue pendienteSi los avances reivindicados en los alrededores de Dhubab y del estrecho son reales o duraderos, y cuántas vidas ha costado la ofensiva.
Sigue pendienteSi el balance de más de 70 muertos en Taiz y el cerco están confirmados por fuentes distintas de las citadas por AFP.
Sigue pendienteCualquier comunicado de Arabia Saudita o Aramco sobre los daños, y una confirmación independiente del control en los alrededores de Dhubab y del estrecho.
Sigue pendienteSi la reunión de funcionarios saudíes, paquistaníes y turcos en Riad da lugar a algún paso hacia la desescalada.
Respondido
Dos mujeres, residentes marroquí y argelina, murieron en el Aeropuerto Internacional de Abha. Un hombre sudanés murió en el Aeropuerto Internacional Rey Jalid de Riad. La autoridad de aviación civil de Arabia Saudita afirma que los ataques contra los dos aeropuertos los días 6 y 7 de octubre mataron a tres civiles e hirieron a 36. 168
La coalición liderada por Arabia Saudita afirma que destruyó 82 objetivos militares hutíes en represalia. Pero el 8 de octubre se produjeron nuevas explosiones, interceptaciones reportadas y extensas alteraciones de vuelos en Riad. La represalia no ha puesto fin al intercambio de ataques, y no existe un nuevo balance definitivo de víctimas del jueves que sustituya al recuento del 6 y 7 de octubre. 142 99 118
Datos clave
El 5 de octubre informamos del inicio de la ofensiva del Gobierno yemení respaldado por Arabia Saudita, de los avances disputados en los alrededores de Bab el Mandeb y de las denuncias hutíes aún sin resolver sobre ataques contra instalaciones de Aramco. Lo que ha cambiado es que se documentaron las víctimas civiles en los aeropuertos, se especificó una campaña de represalia y hubo nuevas alteraciones, no que se hayan confirmado de manera independiente todas las afirmaciones militares.
También informamos de 73 heridos en ataques anteriores, el 9 de septiembre, y de alertas aéreas, un incendio en un depósito de combustible cerca del aeropuerto de Riad e interrupciones de vuelos el 19 de septiembre. Fueron incidentes distintos; ni sus víctimas ni sus imágenes demuestran los daños de octubre.
Qué confirma el balance de los aeropuertos
Entre las 28 personas heridas en Abha había ciudadanos saudíes y residentes de Bangladés y Filipinas. Las ocho personas heridas en Riad eran cinco ciudadanos saudíes, dos residentes egipcios y un residente pakistaní. Las lesiones iban de leves a graves, y todas las personas heridas fueron trasladadas a un hospital. Son cifras oficiales, no un recuento final auditado de forma independiente. 168
El comunicado original de la Autoridad General de Aviación Civil identifica a las fallecidas en Abha como mujeres marroquíes y argelinas. Una información anterior atribuida a AFP describió a una de ellas como egipcia; Arab News publicó la identificación marroquí. El balance oficial sitúa a dos egipcios entre los heridos en Riad, no entre las fallecidas en Abha. Sigue sin esclarecerse el origen exacto de la información contradictoria sobre la nacionalidad. 15 16 168
Ambos aeropuertos sufrieron daños materiales, pero no se especifican las instalaciones afectadas ni las reparaciones necesarias. La Autoridad General de Aviación Civil sitúa los ataques, en conjunto, los días 6 y 7 de octubre, sin asignar una fecha a cada aeropuerto. Su comunicado no identifica a ningún atacante ni confirma un cierre operativo. El portavoz hutí Yahya Saree reivindicó ataques con misiles y drones. 15 168
Saree también mencionó la base aérea Rey Jalid en Jamis Mushait, una instalación distinta del aeropuerto internacional de Riad. El informe anterior de la coalición sobre una interceptación al norte de Riad no demuestra que no se produjeran daños en el aeropuerto. Una interceptación y daños pueden coexistir; las pruebas disponibles no establecen que involucraran el mismo misil. Los daños documentados tampoco verifican la afirmación precisa de Saree de que hubo impactos directos. 23
Un relato anterior distinto se refería a ataques contra el Aeropuerto Rey Abdalá bin Abdulaziz de Jizán y el aeropuerto de Nayrán, que dejaron tres heridos leves. La descripción de The Telegraph del 6 de octubre mencionó tres aeropuertos, no dos; esa discrepancia sigue sin resolverse. Las 36 lesiones posteriores no constituyen simplemente una revisión demostrada de aquellas tres anteriores. 127 30
Las alteraciones del jueves son cuantificables
AFP escuchó explosiones repetidas en distintos puntos de Riad el 8 de octubre. Diplomáticos describieron instrucciones de refugiarse dentro de las embajadas; al menos una escuela internacional trasladó a los niños a un sótano, y algunas empresas del distrito financiero Rey Abdalá evacuaron a su personal. Las autoridades saudíes no habían explicado las explosiones en ese relato inicial. 3
Más tarde, la coalición afirmó que interceptó tres misiles balísticos hutíes: dos se dirigían hacia Riad y uno hacia Jamis Mushait. La Defensa Civil saudí informó que restos de misiles interceptados dañaron un complejo de guardería y clínica médica en Riad. Esos relatos no confirmaron nuevas víctimas. 99 172
Por separado, Reuters informó que testigos vieron salir humo de una aeronave inmóvil en el aeropuerto de Riad. Se creía que estaba vacía, y personas informadas sobre el incidente dijeron que el fuego fue extinguido. Las autoridades saudíes no habían confirmado su causa. El humo de una aeronave no es una prueba independiente de un impacto de misil; la ausencia de un informe confirmado de nuevas víctimas no prueba que ningún incidente del jueves causara heridos. 114
Saree amenazó a las aerolíneas internacionales que siguieran utilizando el espacio aéreo saudí, con la excepción del espacio aéreo de los lugares sagrados de La Meca y Medina. Se trata de una amenaza de un grupo armado, no de un cierre formal del espacio aéreo. La misión de Estados Unidos también advirtió a sus ciudadanos de posibles nuevos ataques con drones y misiles y de una escalada. 117 11
A las 16:25, hora local saudí, del 8 de octubre, los datos de Cirium divulgados por Gulf News mostraron que 169 de las 378 salidas programadas de Riad fueron canceladas o no operaron —el 44.7 por ciento— y que 124 de las 369 llegadas se vieron afectadas. Entre las salidas figuraban 97 de 140 de Saudia, 30 de 91 de flynas y 20 de 54 de flyadeal. Era una instantánea, no un balance final de todo el día ni un recuento exclusivamente de cancelaciones formales. 118
Philippine Airlines suspendió sus servicios a Riad al menos hasta el 11 de octubre; Air India Express y otras aerolíneas tenían cancelaciones hasta el 10 de octubre. Otras aerolíneas del Golfo siguieron utilizando el espacio aéreo saudí, y Riyadh Air dijo que sus vuelos operaban según lo previsto. Se recomendó a los viajeros consultar con sus aerolíneas: hubo alteraciones considerables, no una paralización total de la aviación. 118 115
La represalia deja abiertas las preguntas de fondo
El portavoz de la coalición, el general de división Turki al-Maliki, dijo que los 82 objetivos destruidos estaban en Saada, Al Hudayda, Al Jawf y Marib, e incluían 11 depósitos de misiles balísticos en la montaña, en Saada. Advirtió que los ataques contra civiles «no quedarán impunes». Falta una verificación independiente de la destrucción, los daños en las inmediaciones y las víctimas civiles. Saree alegó que se atacaron lugares civiles en un bombardeo más amplio, sin ofrecer un balance de víctimas. 142 141
La ofensiva precedió a los mortíferos ataques contra los aeropuertos. El presidente del Consejo de Liderazgo Presidencial, Rashad al-Alimi, la anunció el 4 de octubre; las principales operaciones comenzaron el 5 de octubre. Su objetivo declarado era recuperar todo el territorio controlado por los hutíes. Fuerzas alineadas con el Gobierno reivindicaron avances costeros, incluso en los alrededores de Dhubab y Mocha; los hutíes negaron esos avances. El control actual, en particular de las islas del estrecho, sigue siendo incierto. 40 33 31 32
El relato del desplazamiento de civiles es más claro que el mapa del campo de batalla. El informe de la OIM del 7 de octubre registró 201,217 personas desplazadas en Yemen desde el inicio de los combates y advirtió que las necesidades aumentaban y la financiación disminuía. No es un recuento de personas atrapadas dentro de la ciudad de Taiz. 154
Channel 4 News informó de 184,000 desplazados el 5 de octubre, sin especificar el período al que se refería; ese mismo día, France 24 English informó de casi 100,000 «este mes». Associated Press, a través de The Hill, informó de más de 200,000 para el 7 de octubre. El recuento nacional más reciente sustituye esas descripciones generales anteriores, pero sus diferentes alcances no las convierten en una serie armonizada. No deben sumarse. 39 34 23
En los alrededores de Taiz, los residentes describieron carreteras cortadas, escasez de combustible y aumento de los precios de los alimentos. El balance anterior de más de 70 muertos en un día procedía de fuentes vinculadas a los combatientes: 34 tropas gubernamentales y 39 combatientes hutíes. Sigue sin haber confirmación independiente. La estimación de un corresponsal de la BBC de que hay cuatro millones de personas atrapadas no es un recuento verificado de un asedio a la ciudad; el grado de confinamiento y el acceso por carretera siguen sin esclarecerse. 39 33 29 143
La reunión saudí-paquistaní-turca del 5 de octubre dio lugar a promesas de apoyo militar, no a una desescalada demostrada. No se dieron a conocer el número de tropas ni el calendario de despliegue. El 8 de octubre, Hakan Fidan dijo que el texto del acuerdo de Turquía estaba prácticamente terminado, pero que aún faltaba la ratificación parlamentaria; describió la asistencia como defensiva y descartó enviar tropas para operaciones ofensivas. Prepararse no demuestra que se haya producido un despliegue. 29 174
Tal como se emitió 64 líneas
- On October 5 we reported disputed coastal gains. Now airport attacks have killed three civilians. Thirty-six people were injured, and further attacks and flight disruption extend the danger beyond Yemen. What is established about the civilian damage, and what remains unverified in the widening military exchange?
- Both civilian airports sustained material damage. The deaths and 36 injuries belong to attacks on October 6 and 7, not an established new toll from October 8. Emergency and security personnel responded at both airports.
- At Abha, two women, Moroccan and Algerian residents, were killed and 28 people were injured. At Riyadh's King Khalid International Airport, a Sudanese man was killed and eight people were injured. These are official civilian casualty figures, not an independently audited final count.
- The injured at Abha included Saudi citizens, one Bangladeshi resident and one Filipino resident. Riyadh's injured were five Saudi citizens, two Egyptian residents and one Pakistani resident. Injuries ranged from minor to severe, and everyone in the injury accounting was taken to hospital.
- One woman killed at Abha was Moroccan, not Egyptian. Earlier descriptions conflicted on that nationality. The original accounting places two Egyptian residents among Riyadh's injured, not Abha's dead. The precise origin of the conflicting account is not established.
- The casualty statement dates the attacks collectively to October 6 and 7 without assigning a day to each airport. It does not identify an attacker, establish an operational closure, or specify the damaged facilities and repair requirements.
- The Riyadh international airport and King Khalid Air Base in Khamis Mushait are separate facilities. Houthi claims named both, along with Abha airport and bases in Najran and Asir. Those claims do not independently establish the weapons or impacts at each location.
- The Houthis claimed missile and drone attacks on the airports. A precise, direct ballistic-missile hit on Riyadh airport remains unverified. Documented airport damage establishes consequences, but not every detail of the armed group's account.
- One intercepted missile does not prove that no airport damage occurred. The coalition released interception footage and later claimed it destroyed a launcher in Sanaa. The available information does not establish that the interception and airport damage involved exactly the same missile.
- A separate earlier airport incident left three people with minor injuries and caused material damage at Jazan's King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Airport and Najran airport. An October 6 description named three airports rather than two. That difference is not fully reconciled, and the later 36 injuries are not simply a demonstrated revision of those earlier three.
- Repeated blasts brought new protective measures across Riyadh on October 8. Diplomats received instructions to shelter inside embassies. At least one international school moved children into a basement, and some businesses in the King Abdullah Financial District evacuated staff.
- Saudi authorities had not explained those blasts in the first account. Later, the coalition claimed it intercepted and destroyed three Houthi ballistic missiles: two headed toward Riyadh and one toward Khamis Mushait.
- Missile debris damaged a kindergarten and a medical-clinic complex in Riyadh. Separately, witnesses saw smoke from a stationary aircraft at the airport. The aircraft was believed empty, and the fire was reported extinguished, but its cause remains unconfirmed.
- No new casualties were confirmed in those accounts. That is not proof that every October 8 incident caused no injuries. Nor is aircraft smoke independent proof of the direct missile hit claimed by the Houthis.
- The Houthis threatened international airlines continuing to use Saudi airspace, describing it as a theater of military operations. Their warning excluded the airspace of the holy sites in Mecca and Medina. It is an armed group's threat, not a formal airspace closure.
- The first October 8 statement, at 02:51 UTC, claimed an accurate missile hit on King Khalid airport and disrupted operations. Statements at 12:33 and 15:45 UTC claimed further attacks on King Khalid, Najran and the Khamis Mushait air base. Their claimed impacts remain unverified. A United States security alert also warned citizens of potential further drone and missile attacks and possible escalation.
- Flight disruption is measurable. At 16:25 Saudi local time on October 8, 169 of 378 scheduled Riyadh departures, 44.7 percent, were cancelled or not operating. The same snapshot showed 124 of 369 arrivals affected. This is not a final all-day tally.
- These figures include flights cancelled or not operating; they are not solely a count of formal cancellations. Brief disruption had appeared in flight tracking before this later operational snapshot.
- Saudia had 97 of 140 scheduled departures cancelled or not operating. The comparable counts were 30 of 91 for flynas and 20 of 54 for flyadeal. These carrier figures describe the same time-specific snapshot, not separate additional disruption totals.
- Some flights continued while other services were suspended. Other Gulf carriers were still using Saudi airspace, and Riyadh Air said its flights were operating as scheduled. The evidence does not establish that all Saudi aviation stopped.
- Philippine Airlines suspended Riyadh flights through at least October 11. Air India Express and other carriers had cancellations through October 10. The airport advised travellers to check with their airlines. The complete timing of service restoration remains unresolved.
- A missile near Aden's runway also disrupted an inbound flight. The official account describes Yemenia Flight 603 arriving from Cairo and diverting to Jeddah, not a Cairo-bound flight landing safely at Aden. No airport-incident casualties were reported, and flights later resumed.
- An earlier description gave an Aden landing around 03:30. That landing claim is not supported by the ministry's diversion account; raw flight-tracking evidence has not independently settled the discrepancy. A separate Houthi claim of Saudi officers killed or wounded at nearby Badr camp remains unverified.
- The coalition claimed it destroyed 82 Houthi military targets in retaliation and warned that attacks on civilians would not go unpunished. The destruction claim has not been independently assessed, and no verified civilian casualty total exists for that wave.
- The claimed targets lay in Saada, Hodeidah, Al-Jawf and Marib. They included 11 mountain ballistic-missile stores in Saada, command-and-control and communications facilities, depots and assembly areas. The coalition separately described destroying a launch platform in Sanaa preparing another attack.
- Earlier wording of more than 80 targets is compatible with 82, not a competing verified total. The Houthis claimed 156 Saudi air and missile strikes on Sanaa and five provinces, alleging civilian sites were hit without giving a casualty total. Strikes and targets are different measures; subtracting one count from the other would not establish a discrepancy.
- Neither side's description establishes the full civilian impact in Yemen. Saudi airport victims do not prove every retaliatory target was military. A Houthi allegation of civilian damage does not establish that allegation. Surrounding damage and civilian harm remain independently unmeasured.
- The government campaign preceded the deadly airport attacks. Its objective was to retake all Houthi-held territory and restore state institutions. The October 4 announcement was followed by major ground and air operations on October 5, with Saudi Arabia pledging full operational support.
- The campaign is called Operation Dawn of Yemen, also rendered Operation Yemen Dawn. The coalition described 100 fighter jets and more than 300 targets struck; a government spokesperson described more than 100 jets. These remain campaign claims, not independently verified aircraft or target ledgers.
- The earlier account of more than 1,000 strikes did not establish precisely who carried them out. It cannot be corrected simply by substituting a newer target count. Aircraft, strikes and targets measure different things across different reporting periods.
- Government-aligned forces claimed gains at Dhubab, Bab and Hadeid near Bab al-Mandab, including Dhubab's airstrip and key roads. The Giants Brigades claimed they cut the Mocha–Dhubab road. The Houthis denied government advances and retreat.
- Witness accounts described tanks entering towns. Later government statements claimed Mocha's recapture and effective control of the strait or an adjacent oil route. Other accounts described forces approaching Mocha or holding key infrastructure rather than the whole city. Mocha, Mokha and Moca are different spellings of this same port.
- The coastal-gains question remains open. Reported Houthi gains in September have been followed by government counteroffensive claims, not an independently established map of current control. The strait's islands remain particularly unclear, as does whether claimed advances will hold.
- The campaign's death toll is unresolved too. Government spokespeople claimed 1,747, then 1,860 Houthi personnel neutralised, with the latter figure appearing on October 8. Neutralised is not defined clearly enough to mean killed. A Houthi claim of two killed and seven injured in October 5 attacks is also unverified and not an established total for the offensive.
- Coastal positions can support attacks on shipping and constrain supply routes. Mocha lies approximately 75 kilometres north of the strait. A contextual estimate puts about 12 percent of global trade through the area, but that share has not been independently remeasured here.
- Even real Houthi territorial losses could reduce, rather than eliminate, the threat to Red Sea shipping. Houthi-held areas were estimated to contain about 70 percent of Yemen's population and one-third of its territory. Those estimates are not current audited boundaries.
- An imminent government advance into the northwestern highlands or Sanaa was assessed as unlikely. That forecast does not establish what will happen, and claimed coastal success does not establish that commercial passage has become safe.
- The civilian displacement count is clearer than the battlefield map. By October 7, 201,217 people, representing 33,776 households, had been forced from their homes across Yemen. Within that accounting, 197,755 had fled since September 1. Taiz governorate accounted for 114,708, about 57 percent.
- Displacement in Taiz governorate was concentrated in Al Ma'afer, Jabal Habashi and Ash Shamayatayn. More than 3,700 people had fled by sea to Djibouti. These are displacement counts, not a count of people trapped inside Taiz city.
- The dated mid-September estimate was approximately 76,000. A September 28 accounting recorded 145,308 people in 24,218 households across eight governorates since the West Coast escalation in June. That was an increase of 15,870 people, more than 12 percent, since September 21.
- Earlier descriptions of almost 100,000, more than 100,000 or 184,000 displaced used differing or unspecified periods. The latest nationwide total supersedes those broad descriptions for the current account. It does not prove that every earlier estimate counted the same places and dates.
- Those estimates must not be added together or treated as one reconciled statistical series. Humanitarian needs are rising while funding is alarmingly short.
- Cut roads, fuel shortages and rising food prices are compounding the danger around Taiz. Accounts describe Houthi advances toward the city, Turbah's seizure and the cutting of the Taiz–Aden route at al-Safiya. The precise extent of confinement remains unsettled.
- Government-aligned Homeland Shield forces also claimed gains and a drone strike on the Al Wazir front. Some accounts described Taiz as surrounded with its remaining road blocked; others described an attempt to encircle it. Neither wording establishes a verified current account of every road's accessibility.
- An estimate of about four million people trapped must not become a verified count inside Taiz city. The wider governorate has been described as having nearly 4.5 million residents. A population estimate does not establish how many people are physically confined.
- An earlier one-day fighting toll of more than 70 included 34 government troops and 39 Houthi fighters in accounts linked to opposing sides. It is not an independently confirmed current cumulative toll. Another Houthi account of losses does not resolve that uncertainty.
- A hospital received 24 casualties in 24 hours, including a 12-year-old girl hit by shrapnel; that does not mean 24 deaths. A later account described four people shot by snipers, without establishing all died. About 200 families reached El Muni camp in ten days.
- El Muni camp was described as roughly 20 kilometres from the front. An October 3 humanitarian assessment found three in four families in parts of Yemen going hungry. That finding does not establish the same rate everywhere in the country today.
- The Aramco fire's cause remains unresolved. Flames, smoke and firefighters were observed south of Riyadh on October 3. Houthi claims of attacks around Riyadh and Khurais did not establish responsibility, and the coalition called the Riyadh claims misleading.
- No Saudi or Aramco confirmation of Khurais damage has been established, and an asserted East–West pipeline halt remains uncorroborated. Reported cage-like protective fencing around equipment near Riyadh airport shows a protective measure, not evidence that the equipment was hit. New airport casualty documentation does not answer those oil-facility questions.
- On September 9, we reported 73 wounded in the previous day's attacks. On September 19, we reported air alerts, a fuel-depot fire near the main airport and disrupted flights. Those were earlier incidents; their injuries and fire cannot establish October's casualties or damage.
- The current accounting documents three civilian airport deaths and 36 injuries. It does not retroactively verify the causes of earlier fires or settle disputed coastal control.
- The Riyadh meeting produced movement toward military support, not an end to the attacks. Saudi, Pakistani and Turkish officials and commanders met on October 5 under the Mecca defence framework. Their agreement would facilitate rapid deployment of forces and capabilities supporting Saudi Arabia.
- No troop numbers or deployment timetable were disclosed. A political commitment and secretariat were reported, but no public authorisation for Pakistani or Turkish combat inside Yemen has been established. Continued strikes show the meeting did not produce a visible end to the exchange.
- Turkey had not ratified the pact by October 8 at 15:54 UTC. The text was largely complete, had been presented to the president on Wednesday and was to go to parliament as soon as possible. Finalising the text is not ratifying it.
- Turkey described the pact as defensive, ruled out troops for offensive operations and said military delegations were assessing air-defence contributions. Possible assistance included equipment, intelligence, weapons systems, drones and logistics. These are possibilities and preparations, not a confirmed deployed Turkish combat force.
- Turkey's legal ground-troop deployment route under the agreement depended on ratification. Pakistan's longstanding defence ties could permit assistance sooner, but that is a capacity assessment, not a timetable. An official description of a presence in the theatre does not establish personnel locations, sizes or roles.
- That description said Pakistan and Turkey had a presence while only Saudi forces were in combat. It is not independent confirmation of either country's deployment particulars.
- American personnel numbers remain incompletely disclosed. September 10 accounts described more than 100 military advisers, with one estimate near 200. An October 5 secondary account claimed more than 200 analysts. Those dated estimates establish neither a current October headcount nor a demonstrated increase.
- A September 11 account described Mohammed bin Salman seeking American military help and Donald Trump declining US strikes on the Houthis, while Washington offered intelligence sharing and targeting assistance. The earlier adviser accounts described intelligence and targeting work under tight limits.
- The United States backed Saudi Arabia's right to defend itself without disclosing detailed coordination. Assessments described battlefield intelligence, planning, precision-guided munitions and other CENTCOM support, but not all those operational details have been independently established.
- A suggestion of covert Israeli intelligence or targeting help remains speculation, not a substantiated Israeli role. An account of the UAE vice president and senior security officials visiting Saudi Arabia before the offensive does not establish a new operational commitment.
- The answer is that civilian airport damage and casualties are documented, and aviation disruption is extensive. Precise direct-hit claims, the full civilian impact of retaliation, durable coastal gains and actual outside-force commitments remain unresolved. No established new October 8 casualty total replaces the October 6–7 accounting.
- Further airport casualties, the causes of October 8 impacts and the resumption of suspended services still need to be established. In Yemen, 201,217 people were in the latest nationwide displacement accounting while humanitarian needs rose and funding remained alarmingly short.
Fuentes
178 fuentes111 medios20 vídeos7 textos de agencia
Mapa de fuentes
Consulta las pruebas que respaldan este informe. El mapa muestra sus conexiones; los enlaces de abajo abren las fuentes citadas en este artículo.
El mapa de fuentes se carga mientras lees.
Traducción actualizada el
Historial de revisiones
- r1Primera publicación.

