レポート
ミズーリ州に地図は2つ、選挙は1つ――どちらの裁判所が譲るのか？
原語の動画
英語の原文から翻訳されています。
7-0HB 1を阻止した州最高裁の全会一致の票決 6
14日間11月にHB 1を適用するよう命じた連邦の一時的差し止め命令 12
~1.2M新たな区割りで投票した予備選有権者 15
300,000+住民投票請願書の署名数 2
書面上、この計画は中間年の区割り変更を力で押し通した勝利だった。ホワイトハウスと全国レベルの党組織が共和党の下院議席増を働きかけた後、マイク・キーホー知事は特別会期を招集。下院は90-65、上院は21-11でHB 1を可決し、キーホー知事は2025年9月28日に署名した。22 ここで通常の選挙区割りをめぐる政治は終わり、ミズーリ州の憲法が問題となった。
州裁判所が否定した理由
5日間、2つの地図命令
連邦判事が認めた理由
キャサリン・ハナウェイ司法長官とホスキンズは、クラークの命令に従うと述べた。23 その服従自体が、9月3日の差し止め命令に違反する。7 ミズーリ州最高裁は、W・ブレント・パウエル首席判事を通じて、ホスキンズに木曜朝の出廷を命じ、法廷侮辱罪に問われない理由を説明するよう求めた。23 クラークは、その法廷侮辱手続きの停止を拒否した。34 9月9日、第8巡回区控訴裁判所は1ページの判決でクラークの命令の執行停止を認めなかった。33 その翌日までに、リチャード・フォン・グラーンと「政治家ではなく人々」団体は、イライアス・ロー・グループのアブハ・カンナ弁護士を代理人として、米連邦最高裁に執行停止と暫定的な執行停止を求める新たな緊急申立てを提出し、回答期限は木曜朝に設定された。836
関係者
- ブレット・カバノー判事HB 1の緊急使用申請を退けた巡回担当判事
- スティーブン・R・クラーク首席判事ミズーリ州東部地区連邦地方裁判所首席判事。HB 1の適用を命じる14日間の一時的差し止め命令を出した
- ジンジャー・K・グーチ判事ミズーリ州最高裁の7-0の意見書を執筆
- デニー・ホスキンズ法廷侮辱の理由説明を求められている州務長官
- リチャード・フォン・グラーン住民投票運動のリーダー、「政治家ではなく人々」ミズーリ
分かっていること
不明な点
- 両命令が形式上ともに有効なままの場合、どちらが優先するかについて最終的な結論は出ていない
今後の展開
- 投票用紙の準備前に、米連邦最高裁がクラークの命令を停止するかどうか
- 連邦命令に従ったホスキンズが法廷侮辱罪に問われるかどうか
情報源30
CBS News
- HeyDay News
日付のない29媒体：
媒体別の全情報源
30媒体の39件の情報源· 引用の多い順
Democracy Docketdemocracydocket.com4
- Federal judge revives Missouri GOP gerrymander right after Supreme Court rejects state’s emergency bid
- In big win for voters, Supreme Court won’t revive Missouri gerrymander before midterms
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Missouri redistricting fight erupts again as referendum backers ask judge to pause order, appeal to 8th Circuit
CourtListenercourtlistener.com2
- Memorandum and Order On August 4, 2026, Missouri concluded its primary elections using the congressional districts laid out in House Bill 1 (“HB 1”). Missouri voters and candidates for federal office in Missouri request that the Court issue a temporary restraining order enjoining the use of any congressional district map other than HB 1, see generally doc. 2. All parties, including Intervenors People Not Politicians and Richard von Glahn, had notice and submitted briefing. Docs. 2, 12, 19–20, 29–30. Having considered the Verified Complaint, the affidavit attached to it, the parties’ and intervenors’ briefs, and applicable law, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order. I. Facts and Background The Court treats the following uncontroverted facts, drawn from Plaintiffs’ verified complaint, docs. 1, 4, as true for the sake of resolving this motion for a TRO. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(A). Only a very narrow set of facts bear on the resolution of Plaintiffs’ request for a TRO. On September 12, 2025, the Missouri General Assembly passed HB 1, replacing the prior congressional district map enacted in 2022. Doc. 1 ¶¶ 15–16; doc. 12-4 at 11 (The Court cites to CONGRESSMAN ROBERT “BOB” ONDER et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF MISSOURI and DENNY HOSKINS, Defendants.
- Emergency Application for Stay(249929152.1)
All About Redistrictinglls.edu1
Election Law Blogelectionlawblog.org1
放送時の内容
- Missouri's election will run on a map its highest court says never became law.
- The fight is over one congressional seat — and with control of the House on the line, both courts have issued orders that cannot both be obeyed. The question now: which court's order will the U.S. Supreme Court let stand?
- That single seat is the whole prize. The map drawn during a special session last fall would give Republicans seven of Missouri's eight House districts, instead of the current six.
- The current lines keep Kansas City together. The new map carves it up, stretching the remaining Fifth District into rural Republican territory — and the district it was designed to eliminate is held by Democratic Representative Emanuel Cleaver.
- On September third, the state's highest court held that the new map never became law because voters had filed a valid referendum petition. Five of the seven justices were appointed by Republican governors — but the vote was unanimous. Then, on September eighth, Justice Kavanaugh left that ruling in place. And within minutes, a federal judge in St. Louis ordered the exact opposite.
- The court was clear: the map is suspended until Missourians vote on it. That's because the state constitution lets the people call a referendum on any act of the General Assembly — and congressional redistricting is not exempt.
- The map divides one city across three congressional districts. That's the mechanism that would flip the Fifth District — and it's at the center of this constitutional fight.
- Judge Clark, a Trump appointee, argued that the primary already happened on these lines. He said reverting now would create an equal-protection injury — and he cited the Supreme Court's own Purcell principle, but in reverse: instead of freezing the status quo, he used it to lock in the map already used.
- Secretary of State Hoskins rejected the referendum on primary day, arguing the constitution doesn't allow a referendum on congressional maps. The state supreme court said that theory was wrong. Now, Hoskins has been ordered to appear Thursday morning to show why he shouldn't be held in contempt — because he said he'll obey the federal judge instead.
- The clocks are tight. If the Supreme Court stays the federal order, the old map and the referendum control. If it leaves the order standing, the new map is used at least through a preliminary-injunction hearing — and with ballot programming deadlines already passing, whichever map gets loaded is likely the one that stays loaded.
- So which order bends? The referendum backers filed a new emergency application, and the Supreme Court set a response deadline for Thursday morning. Until then, Missouri has two maps and one election calendar — and one seat that could help decide control of the House.
翻訳更新：
