• 播报已发布Hurricane Utah flooding forces Gould Wash and WillowWind evacuations
  • 新报道Ecuador opposition leader Luisa Gonzalez arrested in campaign-finance probe
  • 持续更新Blizzard warning forecasts up to 15 inches of snow on Interior Seward Peninsula — 2 个来源
  • 持续更新Blizzard warning forecasts up to 60 mph gusts for Shishmaref coast — 2 个来源
  • 持续更新Flood watch issued for Santa Barbara County as heavy rain is forecast — 4 个来源
  • 新报道Blizzard warning forecasts 65 mph gusts for Western Arctic Coast
  • 播报已发布South Vienna shooting: Two drivers injured near school; campus stays open
  • 持续更新Blizzard warning forecasts up to 7 inches of snow and 60 mph gusts on Seward Peninsula coast — 2 个来源
  • 新报道High wind warning forecasts gusts up to 65 mph on Yukon Delta Coast
  • 新报道Lakeville police seek help locating missing 15-year-old Sophia Herrera

司法 · 坎顿托儿中心枪支案

枪套没能阻止幼童接触到装有子弹的枪。如今他的父母面临不同指控

一名底特律警员面临虐待儿童指控，孩子的母亲则面临不安全存放枪支指控。两人均表示不认罪；装有子弹的手枪如何进入背包仍不得而知。

播出 文字 阅读需 8 分钟28 个来源HeyDay News Desk · About usWatch report
与 HeyDex 一起探索

通过 RSS 关注

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

译自英文原文。

新闻追踪第 3 天

1 篇报道15 家媒体28 个来源4 个视频

  • 暂无标注日期的事件
  1. 第 1 次更新枪套没能阻止幼童接触到装有子弹的枪。如今他的父母面临不同指控当前位置

这家托儿中心称，手枪放在枪套内并已妥善保管。但一名三岁儿童能从自己的背包里把枪拿出来，一名教师还看到孩子们传递这把枪。无论枪套提供了何种保护，它都没能阻止一把装有子弹的枪落入密歇根州坎顿市儿童世界早期学习中心的孩子们手中。工作人员收好了枪；没有开枪，也无人受伤。3 6

如今，两名家长均已表示不认罪，但他们面临的指控不同。底特律警察局警员布兰登·约翰·伊利被控一项四级虐待儿童罪。拉巴卜·易卜拉欣·扎亚德被控一项不安全存放枪支罪。这一区别很重要：这并非两起完全相同的不安全存枪案件，而且任何一项指控都不等于认定有罪。3 7 9

伊利现年28岁，扎亚德现年27岁。两人于2026年10月1日在普利茅斯市第35区法院接受提审。韦恩县检察官金·沃西在9月28日发生于谢尔登路这家托儿中心的事件后提出指控。7 8 9 11

关键事实

  1. 最高1年若伊利被判有罪，最高可面临的监禁期限 79
  2. 最高93天若扎亚德被判有罪，最高可面临的监禁期限 37

NBC新闻10月1日的报道将两名被告面临的轻罪指控都描述为不安全存枪相关指控。底特律《自由报》10月1日的报道和Police1的报道指出，伊利实际面临的指控是四级虐待儿童罪；《自由报》则指出，扎亚德面临的是不安全存枪罪。报道中的最高1年监禁期限适用于伊利的虐待儿童指控；最高93天适用于扎亚德的存枪指控。这些是可能的处罚，并非已经判处的刑罚。3 7 9

当地媒体报道中更完整的姓名也更正了NBC报道中使用的布兰登·伊莱和拉巴卜·阿尔扎德这两种写法。这些姓名写法指的是同两名被告，并非不同的人。相关报道说明了所报道的指控、出庭情况和答辩，但无法独立查阅底层起诉文件、提审命令及完整的法院案卷。3 7 9

教室里发生了什么

NBC新闻取得的托儿中心致家长信称，枪支放在孩子背包内的枪套里。信中称，男孩把枪拿了出来，工作人员立即介入。警方的说法是，一名教师看到孩子们传递手枪，随后警方接到报警。3

这些说法证实孩子们接触到了枪，也说明了工作人员的应对，但并未构成完整且按时间顺序还原的事件经过。它们没有说明有多少儿童碰过枪、枪在孩子手中停留了多久，或是否有人扣动扳机。称枪支放在枪套里并已妥善保管，不应被误认为它已被锁好或无法接触的证据：在这起事件中，孩子能把枪取出来。

无人受伤是一个重要事实，但不能据此衡量当时有多安全。装有子弹的手枪在一间有幼儿的教室里触手可及。工作人员介入终止了眼前的危险，但这并不能解释枪为何会进入背包。

据NBC报道，该中心此后增加了背包检查，并取消了这名幼童及其一名兄弟姐妹的入托资格。早些时候的一封托儿中心信件称这家人已被取消入托资格；后来的报道明确指出受影响的是两名儿童。两人都失去了在该中心的名额。报道没有说明此前的背包检查规定，也没有说明新检查是否发现了其他危险，或中心及介入处理的教师是否被认定存在疏忽。2 4

警员、枪支与羁押情况

据NBC报道，伊利告诉法庭，他家中有九支枪，并且是底特律警察局警员。Police1报道称，法院命令他交出所有枪支。九支是他本人陈述的数量，并非经过核实的警方清单；交枪令也不能证明所有枪支都已交出。3 9

底特律警方安排伊利从事行政工作。这一雇佣安排不代表他已被解雇，也不构成最终纪律处分认定。NBC 9月29日的报道称，带到托儿中心的手枪不是配发的执勤武器，但这一区别并未说明枪主是谁，也没有解释枪是如何到了孩子手中。1 3

此前关于羁押情况的报道也需要谨慎看待。NBC于9月29日报道，检方正在考虑对一名家长提出指控，其中包括身为警员的家长。坎顿警方称一名家长被羁押，但明确澄清此人不是那名警员。他们表示，警员家长正由另一家机构调查，但没有说明该机构名称。后来对两名家长的提审已取代当时尚待决定的起诉安排；但这并不能追溯性地证明伊利就是最初被拘留的家长。目前的保释金额、羁押或获释状态以及完整的释放条件均未经核实。1 4

存放安全意味着事先防止他人接触

密歇根州的安全存枪法于2024年2月13日生效。根据现有的《密歇根州汇编法》第28.429条文本，在其控制的场所存放枪支或将枪支置于无人看管状态的人，如果知道或理应知道未成年人在场或可能在场，就必须采取规定的防护措施。可选措施包括将枪支放入上锁的箱子或容器，或者保持枪支未装弹，并使用正确扣合的锁定装置将其锁好。16 20 21

这项法律针对的是儿童把枪带进教室之前的接触风险。单靠枪套，并不等同于法规所述的上锁存放，或保持枪支未装弹并上锁这两种防护方式。但这一普遍要求本身无法判定对两名家长的指控是否成立：枪支此前如何存放、每位家长知道些什么，以及枪支被放进背包时的具体情况，仍不得而知。

现有的法规摘录未包含完整的处罚条款，因此无法独立确认扎亚德所受指控对应的确切条款及完整构成要件。案件报道支持两种可能的最高监禁期限，但不能代替完整法规文本或起诉文件。7 16 18

已知

  • 孩子们在托儿中心接触到一把装有子弹的手枪后，工作人员将枪收好。没有开枪，无人受伤；两名家长分别面临轻罪指控，并已表示不认罪。 3679

未知

  • 枪是谁的、是谁把枪放进背包、枪此前存放在哪里，以及每位家长知道些什么，均未查明。伊利是否遵守交枪令，以及他最终的任职结果，也未经核实。

后续

  • 起诉文件和法院命令或可澄清指控内容、保释和释放条件。目前没有经过核实的下次开庭日期。

教室里的紧急情况以无人受伤告终，但法律责任问题并未随之结束。核心问题仍是，一把装有子弹的枪如何落入一名三岁儿童能够接触的地方，以及证据将如何认定那些负有保管责任的成年人。

来源与支持性参考资料

NBC新闻：《NBC晚间新闻——汤姆·拉马斯主持完整版》，9月29日1；《NBC晚间新闻——汤姆·拉马斯主持完整版》，10月1日2；《密歇根州幼童在托儿中心持枪，父母遭起诉》3；《汤姆·拉马斯头条新闻》，9月29日，NBC News NOW4。

WXYZ：《幼童将装有子弹的枪带到坎顿托儿中心后，底特律警员及其妻子遭起诉》5。Patch：《坎顿托儿中心幼童传递枪支后父母遭起诉：检察官》6。底特律《自由报》：《检方起诉传递枪支的幼童的父母》7。FOX 2底特律：《三岁儿童将装有子弹的枪带到坎顿托儿中心，父母接受提审》8。

Police1：《幼童疑将装有子弹的枪带到托儿中心后，底特律警员被控虐待儿童》9。WWJ Newsradio：《坎顿托儿中心儿童传递手枪案中，父母遭起诉》10。New Media Detroit：《坎顿托儿中心发现装有子弹的枪并在儿童间传递后，两名家长遭起诉》11。NBC新闻：《警方称，密歇根幼童在托儿中心展示枪支后，其父母将面临指控》12。

Michigan News Source：《幼童将装有子弹的枪带到坎顿托儿中心后，父母接受提审》13。FOX 2底特律：《坎顿警方：幼童将装有子弹的枪带到托儿中心后，父母双方都将接受提审》14。

密歇根州议会：《密歇根州汇编法》第28.429条15；第28.429条PDF16；2023年第17号公共法案17；《密歇根州汇编法》第750.136b条18；《密歇根州汇编法》第28.429条，另行提供的页面21；SB0079法案分析（颁布版），完成于2024年4月15日22。

密歇根州卫生与公共服务部：《枪支存放处罚》19；《保护家庭的新枪支安全法于2月13日生效》20；《密歇根州的安全存枪法是什么？》23。

ABC新闻：《官员称，三岁儿童在托儿中心被发现持有装有子弹的手枪后，父母遭起诉》24。Lodi News-Sentinel：《幼童将装有子弹的枪带到密歇根州托儿中心后，警员及一名女子遭起诉》25。ClickOnDetroit：《幼童将装有子弹的枪带到坎顿托儿中心后，父母遭起诉》26。FOX 2底特律：《幼童将枪带到托儿中心后，父母遭起诉；视频》27。CBS底特律：《幼童在托儿中心被发现持有装有子弹的枪后，底特律警员遭起诉；视频》28。

播出原貌 13 行
  1. A three-year-old brought a loaded handgun to daycare, where children passed it around. No one was injured, but a loaded firearm reached children in a classroom where adults were responsible for their care. Both parents now face misdemeanor charges, and the charges are different. How did the gun reach the child's backpack, and what has the case established so far?
  2. A teacher spotted the handgun being passed among students at Children's World Early Learning Center on Sheldon Road in Canton, Michigan. Staff intervened, secured the gun, and police were called. The incident happened on September 28, 2026. No shots were fired. The child had brought the loaded handgun into the classroom in his backpack.
  3. A holster did not keep the gun out of this child's hands. The firearm was inside the backpack in a holster, and the boy removed it before staff intervened. Describing it as secured does not establish that it was locked away or inaccessible. The children's handling of the gun and the staff's intervention are established, but the complete sequence is not: how many children touched it, how long they held it, and whether anyone pulled the trigger remain unknown.
  4. Both parents appeared in court on October 1 and pleaded not guilty. Brandon John Ely, 28, and Rabab Ibrahim Al Zayad, 27, were arraigned in the 35th District Court in Plymouth. Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy brought the charges.
  5. Ely faces fourth-degree child abuse, not an unsafe-storage charge. His potential maximum is one year in jail if convicted. Al Zayad faces unsafe firearm storage, carrying a potential maximum of 93 days. Treating the two as identical unsafe-storage cases obscures that distinction. These are allegations, not convictions. The prosecution still has to establish them through the legal process, and no ruling on guilt or sentence is established.
  6. The parents' names also need correcting: Brandon John Ely, not Brandon Eli, and Rabab Ibrahim Al Zayad, not Rabab Alzad. Those different spellings refer to the same defendants. The underlying charging documents, arraignment orders, and complete court docket have not been independently examined.
  7. Ely put his own firearm count at nine in court. That is his statement, not an independently verified inventory. He was ordered to surrender all his guns, but the order is not proof that every firearm has already been turned over. Compliance remains unverified.
  8. Detroit police placed Ely on administrative duty. He is a Detroit police officer, and that employment action does not establish dismissal, a final disciplinary finding, or the outcome of an internal investigation. The handgun brought to daycare was not his service weapon. That distinction does not identify its owner or explain how it reached the backpack.
  9. The parent initially in custody was not the police-officer parent. At the September 29 stage, prosecutors were still weighing charges against a parent, including the officer. Ely was also being investigated by another agency that was not identified. Both parents' later court appearances establish that both were charged; they do not retroactively make Ely the person initially detained. Current bond amounts, custody or release status, and complete release conditions are not verified.
  10. Michigan's secure-storage law requires precautions before a child gains access. It took effect February 13, 2024. The requirement applies when someone stores or leaves a firearm unattended on premises under their control and knows, or reasonably should know, that a minor is or is likely to be present. The alternatives include a locked box or container, or keeping the firearm unloaded and securing it with a properly engaged locking device. A holster alone should not be confused with those protections.
  11. The precise statutory subsection and full elements underlying Al Zayad's charge have not been independently established. The complete penalty provisions are unavailable for that verification. The case's one-year and 93-day potential jail terms are established, but Ely's one-year exposure belongs to the separate fourth-degree child-abuse charge, not an interchangeable unsafe-storage offense.
  12. The toddler and a sibling have both lost their places at the daycare. The center disenrolled them and added backpack checks. The earlier description of the family being disenrolled is now more specific: two children were affected. The previous backpack-check policy is not established, nor is the number of other children present or whether the new checks have uncovered additional hazards. No finding of negligence against the center or the teacher who intervened is established.
  13. The gun's route into the backpack remains unexplained. What is known is that a loaded handgun reached the classroom, children could access it, staff secured it, and both parents now face separate charges. What remains unknown is who owned it, who put it there, where it had previously been stored, and what each parent knew. Ely's final employment outcome and compliance with the gun-surrender order are also unresolved. No verified next hearing date is available.

来源

28 个来源15 家媒体4 个视频

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。