跳到内容
现在

报道

两名枪手因咖啡馆处决案获刑34年——出资者仍不明

Jaeden Tito和Rabii Zahabe因在咖啡馆枪击、致Gavin Preston死亡，被判处监禁10年。法院称这是一起为牟利而实施的处决，但幕后主使至今无人被起诉。

文字 阅读需 4 分钟 · 26 个来源

HeyDex

原语言视频

译自英文原文。

触发者有姓名和囚犯编号。指使他们的人却没有。2026年9月8日，25岁的Jaeden Tito和26岁的Rabii Zahabe因在墨尔本白天实施受雇杀人，各被判处34年监禁；而据称策划并出资、且确切知道受害者会坐在哪里的人，至今未被起诉。⁠4⁠7

34每名枪手的刑期 47
约10秒内11发Sweet Lulu's Cafe外开出的枪数 410
26和27Tito、Zahabe不得假释的年限 4
50受害者Gavin Preston的年龄 24

在维多利亚州最高法院，Michael O'Connell法官判处两人谋杀50岁的Gavin "Capable" Preston、企图谋杀其同伴Abbas "AJ" Maghnie的罪名成立。⁠4⁠7 Tito须服刑26年后才有资格申请假释，法院宣布将其审前羁押的1,049天计入刑期。⁠4 Zahabe须服刑27年，法院宣布计入其审前羁押的808天。⁠4 检方曾要求对两人各判终身监禁。⁠4⁠7

Keilor的十秒处决

2023年9月9日星期六上午，Preston和Maghnie坐在墨尔本西北部Keilor的Sweet Lulu's Cafe外。⁠2⁠11 咖啡馆经理后来作证说，Preston“从不”坐在外面，直到中枪那天才这样做。⁠11 两名蒙面黑衣男子从一辆被盗汽车中跳出并开枪；约10秒内共开了11枪，早午餐时段的顾客纷纷寻找掩护。⁠2⁠10⁠11 Preston被法院和警方称为墨尔本最凶暴的黑帮人物之一，身中七枪，当场死亡。⁠4⁠7 Maghnie腹部中枪，肠道和泌尿系统受到危及生命的伤害，经过多次手术才幸存。⁠4

从咖啡馆到法庭

  1. 2023年9月9日

    Gavin Preston在Keilor的Sweet Lulu's Cafe外遭枪杀；其同伴受伤。

    23
  2. 2026年5月8日

    陪审团裁定Jaeden Tito和Rabii Zahabe谋杀及企图谋杀罪名成立。

    6
  3. 2026年9月8日

    Michael O'Connell法官判处两人各34年监禁。

    47

这起杀人案经过数小时而非数分钟的策划。⁠5⁠7 法庭获悉，两人在咖啡馆附近埋伏，等待有关Preston所在位置的情报；法官称这是一起经过缜密策划的受雇杀人案。⁠5⁠7 检方称，两人从新南威尔士州跨州前来实施杀人行动，使用事先藏匿的被盗逃逸车辆，其中一些车装有克隆车牌和深色车窗。⁠5⁠7 其中一人纵火焚车时把自己也烧着，销毁证据的企图因此以极其狼狈的方式失败。⁠1 一名预订好的专车司机正等着送他们返回悉尼。⁠5 从衣物、燃油罐和车门把手上提取的DNA，加上数字痕迹，将他们与这起阴谋联系起来；陪审团于2026年5月8日裁定他们罪名成立。⁠6

在公共场合为牟利而实施的处决，冷酷无情地漠视人的生命价值。

Michael O'Connell法官 4

O'Connell强调了旁观者面临的危险，并指出Preston本人的犯罪记录并不削弱法律对其生命的保护。⁠4 他没有采纳检方要求判处终身监禁的主张，理由是两名罪犯的年龄——案发时均为22岁——此前没有暴力犯罪定罪记录，以及羁押条件严苛。⁠4⁠7 不过，鉴于罪行严重程度、策划过程、经济动机以及高度的道德罪责，他仍判处高于标准刑期的刑罚。⁠4

已知

  • Tito和Zahabe因谋杀和企图谋杀各被判处34年监禁。 47
  • 维多利亚州警方对谁组织这起杀人行动的调查仍在继续；目前没有任何组织者被起诉。 4

未知

  • 所谓幕后主使的身份和相关指控均未经证实；动机说法仍未得到证实。

后续

  • 持续调查是否会使委托这起杀人行动的人被捕。

庭审中听到的两个细节令案情更加耐人寻味。枪击后，两人驱车前往悉尼；据报道，Zahabe曾搜索哪些国家没有引渡条约。⁠1 被定罪者没有指认任何人。⁠4 庭审中提出的动机说法包括一笔据称价值$5 million的杀人委托：Preston据称曾企图盗走埋葬在地下的对手妹妹Meshlin Marrogi的遗体，她是George Marrogi的妹妹；此外还有猜测将矛头指向悉尼和与Comanchero有关的不同人物。⁠8⁠9 这些说法都未被证实是此案背后的委托安排。法院称，这起犯罪是由一名神秘的黑帮幕后主使指挥的，此人掌握着Preston所在位置这一关键信息。⁠9

来源16

在此处引用的来源中，ABC News (Australia)最先发布，比本报道播出早7小时。
  1. ABC News (Australia)
  2. HeyDay News

15家媒体未注明日期：ABC listenThe AgeAAP NewsAustralia1News7NEWS

按媒体查看所有来源

来自 16 家媒体的 26 个来源· 引用最多的优先

播出原貌
  1. Two gunmen who executed a Melbourne gangland figure outside a cafe now each serve 34 years.
  2. The man who allegedly paid for the hit is still walking free. The court heard the killing was a contract job, yet no one has been charged with ordering it.
  3. So who ordered the execution — and will police ever find the mastermind?
  4. The attack on September 9, 2023, lasted about ten seconds. Two masked men in black jumped from a stolen car and fired eleven shots. Preston, a 50-year-old described as one of Melbourne's most violent gangland figures, was hit seven times and died at the scene. His associate, Abbas Maghnie, was shot in the stomach and survived after multiple operations. The cafe manager later testified that Preston never sat outside until the day he was shot.
  5. Both men were sentenced to 34 years. Prosecutors had sought life sentences, but Justice O'Connell cited their youth — both were 22 at the time of the offence — their lack of prior violent convictions, and the harsh conditions of custody. Still, the term sits above the standard sentence because of the gravity, the planning, and the financial motive.
  6. Tito will be eligible for parole after 26 years, with more than a thousand days already served counted. Zahabe's non-parole period is 27 years, with 808 days declared.
  7. He also noted the danger to bystanders and said Preston's own criminal history did not diminish the law's protection of his life.
  8. The killing was planned over hours, not minutes. The pair had travelled up from New South Wales, used pre-positioned getaway cars with cloned plates and tinted windows, and even had a chauffeur booked for the return trip. One of them set himself on fire while torching a car, but DNA on clothing, a fuel can, and car handles, plus digital traces, linked them to the scene.
  9. Victoria Police has confirmed the investigation into who organised the hit is continuing. The two men convicted have not named anyone. The theories aired at trial included a $5 million contract, but none has been substantiated.
  10. So the question stands: who ordered the execution? Police have not named a suspect, and the two men who pulled the triggers have stayed silent. The case against them is closed — the inquiry into the person whose plan set it in motion is not.

译文更新于

近期播出