跳到内容
现在

司法 · 乌埃诺银行案

培尼亚在乌埃诺银行案中被下令羁押，数百万储户等待取回存款

一名法官下令羁押巴拉圭遭罢免的总统，作为乌埃诺银行调查的一部分。检方仍须证明他被指称的角色，而数百万客户仍在等待取用存款。

文字 阅读需 4 分钟 · 25 个来源

HeyDex

原语言视频

译自英文原文。

294万客户：这是在巴拉圭银行业危机演变为总统危机之前，乌埃诺银行的客户规模。据DW报道，这一数字指客户人数，而非被冻结的个人账户数量，也不代表储户的存款已永久损失。但它显示了圣地亚哥·培尼亚被免职背后的紧急状况规模：数百万储户无法动用存款，主要公共机构的资金也被冻结。⁠1

如今，培尼亚被关押在亚松森的总统护卫团营地。2026年11月7日，法官翁贝托·奥塔苏下令对他实施审前羁押；此前一天，培尼亚遭弹劾并被捕。检方正在调查与乌埃诺银行有关的涉嫌背信和自我交易行为。该命令决定了这名前总统在诉讼期间将被关押在哪里，但并未认定他实施了这些罪行，也未认定他导致了银行危机。⁠1⁠12

这一区分至关重要，因为三个不同的问题如今纠缠在一起：培尼亚是否应该继续担任总统、检方能否证明存在刑事不当行为，以及客户何时能取回自己的钱。他被免职解决了第一个问题。他被羁押并未解决另外两个问题。

从银行遭接管到总统被羁押

  1. 2026年11月3日

    乌埃诺银行面临偿付能力问题、客户无法支取存款之际，中央银行的介入一事公之于众。

    119
  2. 2026年11月6日

    培尼亚遭弹劾后被免职并被捕。

    12
  3. 2026年11月7日

    奥塔苏下令将培尼亚审前羁押在总统护卫团营地；他此前一晚已在那里度过。

    112

检方必须证明的交易

11月7日，在司法裁决作出之前，培尼亚在亚松森的总检察院待了约3小时。这是他前往检方接受问询的时长，并非随后法院听证会的时长。检方申请审前羁押；奥塔苏在另一场由培尼亚及其律师出席的听证会后批准了申请。⁠1

检察官南希·萨洛蒙将涉嫌罪名确定为背信和为个人利益管理资产，也称自我交易。这些说法是检方的指控，并非对培尼亚行为的既定描述。案件的关键在于，公共资金和养老金资金据称是如何流入乌埃诺银行的，以及为何留在那里。⁠1

据DW所述的检方文件，培尼亚可能曾介入将公共机构和养老金实体的大笔资金存入该银行、续存并继续留存于该行的安排。检方还指称，他此前与乌埃诺所属商业集团存在经济和公司层面的关系。⁠1

报道将这些存款与另一组交易联系起来：据称，乌埃诺在向关联自身经济集团的公司提供贷款的同时，也收到了公共资金。检方文件提到，中央银行的监管机构在这些放贷业务中发现了监管审查意见和违规情况。这些是对关联交易的指控，尚未形成一条能够证明培尼亚负有刑事责任的证据链。⁠1

这就是接下来必须完成的举证任务。过去存在商业关系，本身并不能证明总统指示公共机构存入资金。银行倒闭也不能证明谁造成了损失。检方必须将涉嫌施加的影响与相关交易联系起来，并证明其所指控的罪行。

巴拉圭媒体报道还将巴拉圭中央银行前行长卡洛斯·卡瓦略列为共同被告。他的角色必须与培尼亚的角色区分开来：一人领导中央银行，另一人领导国家。本报道未能独立查阅已签署的羁押令及完整起诉材料，现有证据也无法确定可归因于培尼亚的损失金额，或他个人从中获利多少。⁠17⁠1

新总统上任，存款仍被冻结

弹劾认定培尼亚履职不力——这是政治判断，与刑事定罪不同。他的前副总统佩德罗·阿利亚纳继任，并于11月7日开始担任总统的第一个完整工作日。两人都属于红党。总统职位易主，但执政党没有更迭。⁠1⁠4

对储户而言，这次权力交接并未消除眼前的问题。中央银行在银行面临偿付能力困难之际介入，银行业报道则称清理程序已经启动。启动清理程序并不意味着清算已经完成。同样，存款无法支取也不能证明其全部价值已永久损失。客户最终能收回多少，取决于接下来发生什么。⁠19⁠21⁠24

限制措施波及家庭储蓄和国家资金。据DW报道，随后发生大规模街头抗议，警方驱散了抗议者。现有材料无法证实伤亡或逮捕人数。⁠1

立法方面已有回应：巴拉圭参议院报告称，一项提供存款担保预付款的措施已获批准。这是具体的政策举措，但获批并不意味着客户已经收到款项，也不能证明所有存款都会全额返还。目前没有经确认的恢复日期，也没有经核实的最终追回金额总数。⁠25

来源20

在此处引用的来源中，theparaguaypost.com最先发布，比本报道播出早5天。 随后还有13家媒体发布。
  1. theparaguaypost.com
  2. ABC
  3. MacroHerald
  4. The Asunción Times
  5. senado.gov.py
  6. Google News México (MX:es-419)
  7. La Nación
  8. RTVE.es
  9. 另有+6家媒体
  10. HeyDay News

6家媒体未注明日期：apnews.comefe.comfixscr.comInvesting.com 香港NPRPoder Judicial

按媒体查看所有来源

来自 20 家媒体的 25 个来源· 引用最多的优先

播出原貌
  1. Santiago Peña is being held at the Presidential Escort Regiment. A judge has ordered the ousted president to remain in custody while prosecutors investigate alleged misuse of public and pension money. Millions of savers can't access deposits at the bank at the center of the case. Can prosecutors prove Peña used his influence over that money?
  2. Peña had already spent Friday night at the regiment in Asunción. Judge Humberto Otazú ordered him to remain there on November 7. The ruling keeps the former president in custody while the criminal investigation into Ueno Bank continues.
  3. Earlier that day, Peña spent about three hours being questioned by prosecutors in the capital. Prosecutors then sought pretrial detention. Otazú granted their request after a separate hearing attended by Peña and his lawyer.
  4. Peña lost the presidency and was arrested on November 6. His impeachment found him responsible for poor performance of duties. On November 7, the judge ordered pretrial detention. The impeachment decided his political future. Prosecutors still have to prove the criminal allegations.
  5. Prosecutor Nancy Salomón identified the alleged offenses as breach of trust and administration for personal benefit, also described as self-dealing. The prosecution is examining whether Peña helped direct substantial public and pension funds into Ueno Bank and keep them there.
  6. Prosecutors allege Peña intervened when public institutions and pension entities placed money at Ueno, renewed those placements and left funds there. They also allege the bank received public resources while lending to companies connected to its own business group.
  7. Prosecutors say Peña had an earlier economic and corporate relationship with the bank's business group. They also point to supervisory observations and irregularities identified by the central bank in the lending operations. Those alleged connections are what investigators must now turn into evidence against him.
  8. Otazú's decision determines where Peña will remain during the proceedings. It leaves prosecutors with the task of proving their accusations, including his alleged role in the transactions. The court hasn't decided his guilt or found that he caused the bank's crisis.
  9. Ueno's customers face a more immediate problem. The central bank intervened amid solvency problems, and the crisis became public on November 3. Savers lost access to deposits, while public institutions also found money they held at the bank frozen.
  10. Ueno Bank had 2.94 million customers. That figure counts the bank's customers, rather than individual frozen accounts. Major state institutions were among those with funds frozen, so the restrictions reached public money as well as personal savings.
  11. The central bank began a resolution process to deal with the troubled bank. Customers' eventual recovery depends on what happens through that process. Restricted access to a deposit doesn't by itself tell a saver how much money will ultimately be recovered.
  12. Large street protests followed the loss of access to savings, and police repelled protesters. The bank crisis spilled into public anger before the change at the presidency. Removing Peña from office left customers facing the same restrictions on their money.
  13. Lawmakers have approved legislation for an advance on deposit guarantees. That creates a response for savers waiting for money, but payments to customers haven't been confirmed. The political transfer has also kept the presidency within the same party.
  14. Pedro Alliana succeeded Peña after serving as his vice president. November 7 was his first full day as president, and both men belong to the Colorado Party. Carlos Carvallo, who previously headed the central bank, is also accused in the Ueno investigation.
  15. Prosecutors still have to connect Peña's actions to the movement of public savings and the bank's lending in court. How much public or pension money was improperly placed remains unclear. For customers, there's still no confirmed date for restoring access to deposits, or a verified total of what they will ultimately recover.

译文更新于

近期播出