• 播报已发布Hurricane Utah flooding forces Gould Wash and WillowWind evacuations
  • 新报道Ecuador opposition leader Luisa Gonzalez arrested in campaign-finance probe
  • 持续更新Blizzard warning forecasts up to 15 inches of snow on Interior Seward Peninsula — 2 个来源
  • 持续更新Blizzard warning forecasts up to 60 mph gusts for Shishmaref coast — 2 个来源
  • 持续更新Flood watch issued for Santa Barbara County as heavy rain is forecast — 4 个来源
  • 新报道Blizzard warning forecasts 65 mph gusts for Western Arctic Coast
  • 播报已发布South Vienna shooting: Two drivers injured near school; campus stays open
  • 持续更新Blizzard warning forecasts up to 7 inches of snow and 60 mph gusts on Seward Peninsula coast — 2 个来源
  • 新报道High wind warning forecasts gusts up to 65 mph on Yukon Delta Coast
  • 新报道Lakeville police seek help locating missing 15-year-old Sophia Herrera

司法

泰勒·贾普被判谋杀布里安娜·海耶斯罪名成立；等待假释资格禁期裁定

埃斯特万陪审团在为期六周的庭审后裁定贾普有罪。他将被依法判处终身监禁，但假释资格禁期和量刑时间安排仍未确定。

播出 文字 阅读需 6 分钟30 个来源HeyDay News Desk · About usWatch report
与 HeyDex 一起探索

通过 RSS 关注

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

译自英文原文。

新闻追踪第 4 天

1 篇报道13 家媒体30 个来源1 个视频

  1. 第 1 次更新泰勒·贾普被判谋杀布里安娜·海耶斯罪名成立；等待假释资格禁期裁定当前位置

陪审团已经对泰勒·摩根·贾普是否有罪作出裁决，但尚未确定他必须服刑多久才能首次获得假释资格。他因布里安娜·海耶斯遭枪击身亡而被判二级谋杀罪，依法必须终身监禁，但本案具体的假释资格禁期仍未确定。2 3

12人陪审团于2026年10月6日星期二晚上9:40刚过，在萨斯喀彻温省埃斯特万的国王法院作出裁决。这一决定结束了为期六周、审理海耶斯于2024年4月死亡一案的庭审。贾普否认杀害了她，并作证称开枪的是一名蒙面男子；陪审团仍裁定他有罪。1 3 7

理解本案的关键，在于区分被告说了什么与陪审团认定了什么。裁决认定贾普对二级谋杀负有刑事责任，但并未公开说明陪审员接受、驳回或认为具有决定性作用的具体证词。

被告全名为泰勒·摩根·贾普，通常简称泰勒·贾普。报道称他和海耶斯都来自奥克斯博。CBC在一张拍摄于2026年9月21日的照片说明中称，贾普当时26岁。3 1 2

从枪击身亡到裁决

  1. 2024年4月

    布里安娜·海耶斯在枪击事件中身亡。

    3
  2. 2026年10月5日

    迈克尔·莫里斯法官作最后指示，陪审团开始审议。

    810
  3. 2026年10月6日，晚上9:40刚过

    陪审团裁定贾普犯二级谋杀罪。

    3

陪审团经过两天审议后作出裁决。10月7日和10月8日是报道和发布的日期，并非陪审团作出裁决的日期。SaskToday将裁决日期定为10月6日，DiscoverEstevan和CJME也称结果于星期二晚间出炉。1 3 5 7

关于枪击事件后续的两种说法

CTV在10月7日的新闻节目中报道，萨斯喀彻温省皇家骑警于2024年4月25日在穆斯山乡村自治市发现海耶斯的遗体。这些具体的发现细节依据CTV的报道；其他现有报道未能独立证实。还必须将发现遗体的地点与贾普作证时提到的房屋区分开来。1

据CTV报道，贾普作证称，他从白熊湖度假村的一栋房屋中移走海耶斯的遗体，并在约45分钟车程外的一个自治市将其藏匿，泰勒·肖提供了帮助。这是他对移走和藏匿遗体的说法，并非承认自己开枪打死了她。他声称开枪的是一名蒙面男子。1

CTV转述的肖向警方所作陈述，对枪击后的经过给出了截然不同的说法。肖称，他当时在外面，听到枪声，随后看见贾普手持一把黑色手枪，站在海耶斯流血的遗体旁边。这是关于肖称自己事后听到和看到什么的说法，并不是说他目击了开枪过程。1

报道中关于肖参与此事的说法存在尚未解决的矛盾。CTV在10月7日的裁决报道中称，肖在庭审前已经去世，没有出庭作证。然而，DiscoverEstevan在9月24日有关辩方的报道中提到，他最初向警方作出的陈述与“后来作证”之间存在差异。现有报道无法确定这一说法指的是另一场诉讼、另一个阶段，还是一处错误。1 24

这种不确定性限制了对警方所述内容的描述能够有多确定。不能将其表述为肖亲自向本案陪审团提供、且未受质疑的目击证词。肖的陈述究竟如何进入庭审记录，目前仍不清楚。

其他庭审报道指出，布兰登·吉布森是控方最后一名证人，并称吉布森和海耶斯曾协助贾普在萨斯喀彻温省南部贩毒。这些说法属于庭审证据；谋杀罪裁决并未另行证实有关他们活动的每一项指控。25

有关贾普作证的报道还提到，据称有人向吉布森提出3万加元，并谈及不在场证明以及与肖的交往。现有报道摘录指出吉布森是据称的受款人，但没有确定是谁提出这笔钱、目的是什么，或这一指控是否受到质疑。陪审团没有作出具体认定，证明有人提出或支付这笔钱，或试图收买证词。填补这些空白，会把庭审中讨论的一项指控变成报道无法支持的结论。22 26

终身监禁，另有一项决定尚待作出

与这些有争议的细节相比，量刑后果更为明确。CBC报道，二级谋杀罪依法必须判处终身监禁，且至少10年内不能开始获得假释资格。SaskToday报道，贾普的假释资格禁期尚未确定。现有报道并未证实已经完成量刑裁决，也未确定本案的具体禁期。2 3

因此，不得将10年说成贾普最终的假释资格禁期，更不能说成承诺的获释日期。重要的区别在于，终身监禁是强制刑罚，而假释资格禁期则是他最早无法获得假释资格的那段时间。

该禁期由量刑法官决定。现有《刑法》摘录指出，罪犯的品格是考量因素之一，并规定二级谋杀罪定罪后可由陪审团提出建议的程序。这些摘录没有说明完整的法定范围、所有例外或全部考量因素；也没有证据表明陪审团在贾普案中提出过建议。14 15

CTV报道，律师预计将于10月9日星期五上午再次出庭，讨论量刑陈述的日期。这场预计中的庭审尚未得到独立证实。报道所述目的在于安排日程，而非判处双方同意的刑罚，也不是已经确认举行的量刑听证会。1

陪审团的决定影响重大且明确：贾普谋杀海耶斯罪名成立。下一项影响重大的决定尚待作出。量刑陈述的日期、控辩双方将提出的立场，以及法官将判定的假释资格禁期，都仍未确定。

本篇法院报道的来源

CTV News：《Regina at Six》，2026年10月7日；以及两篇网络裁决报道，标题均为《萨斯喀彻温男子因枪杀女子被判有罪》。1 4 6

CBC News：《埃斯特万陪审团裁定泰勒·贾普犯二级谋杀罪，罪名涉及布里安娜·海耶斯之死》；以及《控方结束泰勒·贾普二级谋杀案庭审举证》。2 25

SaskToday：泰勒·贾普被定罪的裁决报道；以及《陪审团开始审议泰勒·贾普二级谋杀案》。980 CJME：其裁决报道。620 CKRM：其关于开始审议的报道。3 8 5 9

DiscoverEstevan：两个所提供网址上的裁决报道；关于审议、贾普作证，以及辩方质疑泰勒·肖证词的报道。DiscoverMooseJaw：关于贾普作证和枪击后通信的报道。7 23 10 22 24 11 26

加拿大司法部《刑法》：第745条（所提供的两个网址）；第745.1、745.2、745.4和745.5条，包括所提供的替代网址；以及第745.51条。12 30 18 14 16 15 29 13 28

其他量刑参考资料：《Criminal Code Help》“加拿大二级谋杀：刑罚与假释”；《Crime Canada》“二级谋杀”；“谋杀犯的假释资格：司法……的演变”；加拿大2011年关于加重谋杀犯刑罚的公告；以及CanLII评论文章《研究谋杀案假释资格禁期的适用……》。17 27 19 20 21

播出原貌 17 行
  1. A jury convicted Taylor Japp of murdering Briana Hayes. Second-degree murder carries mandatory life imprisonment, but his parole-ineligibility period remains undetermined. What does this conviction settle, and what remains for the sentencing judge to decide?
  2. Twelve jurors found Japp guilty at the Court of King’s Bench in Estevan, Saskatchewan, just after 9:40 p.m. on Tuesday, October 6, 2026. Their decision followed a six-week trial concerning Hayes’s April 2024 shooting death.
  3. The defendant’s full name is Taylor Morgan Japp, commonly shortened to Taylor Japp. His surname has two p’s; the victim’s first name, Briana, has one n. Both were identified as being from Oxbow. Japp was identified as 26 in a photograph caption dated September 21, 2026.
  4. Justice Michael Morris gave the jury its final instructions on October 5, and deliberations began that day. After two days of deliberations, the jury returned its verdict on October 6—not October 7 or October 8.
  5. Japp denied killing Hayes. He testified that a masked man shot her. The guilty verdict establishes his criminal responsibility for second-degree murder despite that denial. It does not publicly explain which individual parts of the testimony jurors accepted, rejected or considered decisive.
  6. Saskatchewan RCMP found Hayes’s body in the Rural Municipality of Moose Mountain on April 25, 2024. Those exact discovery details lack independent corroboration. The place where her body was found must be distinguished from the house described in Japp’s testimony.
  7. Japp testified that he removed Hayes’s body from a house at White Bear Lake Resort and concealed it in a municipality roughly 45 minutes away, with Tyler Shaw’s help. That was his account of moving and hiding her body—not an admission that he shot her.
  8. Shaw’s police account presented a different picture. He said he heard a gunshot while outside, then saw Japp holding a black pistol beside Hayes’s bleeding body. That describes what Shaw said he heard and saw afterward—not witnessing the shot itself.
  9. The distinction matters because a statement about the aftermath is not the same as an eyewitness account of the shooting. Nor is it established precisely how Shaw’s police statement entered the trial record. His participation is also described in conflicting ways that remain unresolved.
  10. Shaw is identified as having died before the trial and not having testified to this jury. But a separate reference to his “later testimony” remains unexplained. It is unclear whether that means another proceeding, another stage, or an error.
  11. His police statement therefore cannot be treated as uncontested testimony delivered in person to these jurors. Brandon Gibson was the Crown’s final witness. Trial evidence described Gibson and Hayes as assisting Japp in drug dealing across southern Saskatchewan. The murder verdict does not separately establish every allegation about those activities.
  12. Japp’s testimony also addressed an alleged $30,000 offer to Gibson, an alibi and interactions with Shaw. Gibson was identified as the alleged recipient, but who offered the money, its purpose and whether the allegation was contested remain unestablished.
  13. There is no specific jury finding establishing that offer, a payment, or an attempted purchase of testimony. The verdict determines guilt on the murder charge; it is not a separate endorsement of every assertion aired during the trial.
  14. Second-degree murder carries mandatory life imprisonment, with parole eligibility unavailable for at least 10 years. But Japp’s specific period has not been determined, and no completed sentencing order is established. Ten years is not his final term or a promised release date.
  15. The trial judge determines that period. The sentencing provisions identify the offender’s character as a consideration and provide for a jury-recommendation procedure. No recommendation in this case is established. The available legal details do not establish the complete statutory range, all exceptions or the full list of considerations.
  16. Counsel were expected back on Friday morning, October 9, to discuss a date for sentencing submissions. That appearance is not independently confirmed. It is a scheduling step—not an established sentencing hearing, an agreed sentence or a forecast of the judge’s decision.
  17. The conviction settles Japp’s guilt. The unresolved decision is how long he must serve before first becoming eligible for parole. The date of sentencing submissions, the prosecution and defence positions, and the period the judge will impose remain undetermined.

来源

30 个来源13 家媒体1 个视频1 篇通稿

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。