报道持续报道 · 第 2 篇，共 3 篇

费尔福德五名嫌疑人获保释；邻居仍在等待解除警报

在美军使用的空军基地附近被捕的五名男子均已获准警方保释。调查人员尚未确认是否存在可用装置，也未说明被疏散居民何时可以返家。

播出 文字 阅读需 5 分钟119 个来源HeyDay News Desk · About usWatch report
与 HeyDex 一起探索

通过 RSS 关注

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

译自英文原文。

持续报道第 7 天

3 篇报道83 家媒体188 个来源44 个视频

完整报道
5 天无进展
  • 暂无标注日期的事件
  1. 第 1 次更新韦尔福德居民遭疏散，陆军检查皇家空军费尔福德基地附近车辆
  2. 第 2 次更新费尔福德五名嫌疑人获保释；邻居仍在等待解除警报当前位置
  3. 第 3 次更新RAF Fairford附近未发现爆炸装置，英国怀疑伊朗参与较新

自上次报道以来的变化

31 小时后

当时

韦尔福德居民遭疏散，陆军检查皇家空军费尔福德基地附近车辆

当时尚无定论

  • 车辆检查结果、确切数量、此次行动的起因，以及事件是否与皇家空军费尔福德基地有关，均未得到确认。

我们说过将关注的

  • 警方确认检查已经完成、警戒线已经撤除且居民可以返家。

现在

在美军使用的空军基地附近被捕的五名男子均已获准警方保释。调查人员尚未确认是否存在可用装置，也未说明被疏散居民何时可以返家。

现已确认

  • 五名男子均获准警方保释，目前仍在接受调查。

英国皇家空军费尔福德基地附近的警方行动，已从逮捕转为公开调查，五名男子获准保释——但羁押状态的变化，并未解答促使邻居离开家园的那些疑问。9月27日，我们报道说，基地附近有数名男子因涉嫌爆炸物相关罪行被捕，军方专家检查车辆，居民则被疏散。当时尚未确定被捕人数、疏散规模以及警报来源。警方后来将逮捕人数定为五人、车辆数定为三辆，并称约85户居民接到离开建议。9月28日下午，助理警务处长劳伦斯·泰勒表示，这些男子将获准警方保释；后续报道说，五人已全部获释。他们仍在接受调查。84 104 3

这一最新进展取代了天空新闻周一早间关于五人仍被羁押的报道。保释既不等于无罪，也不代表调查人员已查明车辆里有什么。这些男子尚未被公开点名或起诉。后续报道称，他们是来自伦敦的英国公民，年龄在23至25岁之间，但没有分别说明每个人的年龄。早期报道提到的无指控羁押最长14天，是法律规定的上限，并非对这些男子将被羁押多久的预测。2 88 111 104

关键事实

  1. 5在惠尔福德附近被捕的男子 85
  2. 3警方接报涉及的车辆 3
  3. ~85接到疏散建议的住户数 6

格洛斯特郡警方称，他们于英国夏令时9月27日星期日凌晨约12:45接到公众报案，称有三辆可疑车辆似乎正驶向英国皇家空军费尔福德基地。持枪警员在惠尔福德附近拦截车辆；警方通报采用的地名拼法为Whelford，并逮捕五名男子，最初指控他们涉嫌违反《爆炸物法》。随后，他们又因涉嫌依据《反恐法》第5条准备实施恐怖主义行为而被捕。反恐警务部门牵头调查，但在现有官方通报中，警方并未正式宣布发生恐怖事件。逮捕发生在空军基地附近，这并不能证明基地内发生过任何事情。85 3 5

一名农民后来告诉BBC，她在凌晨1:30刚过时看到三辆厢式货车和一大群人，随后拨打了紧急服务电话。她的回忆与警方所说的凌晨12:45接报时间尚未得到协调：现有说法无法确定两者指的是不同来电，还是同一警报的不同时间。国防大臣韦斯·斯特里廷表示，报案人掌握的只是“部分情况”，但没有列出安全部门在公众报案前已知情况的经核实时间线。115 117 94

陆军爆炸物处理小组在警戒线内检查了车辆。ABC新闻9月28日报道称警戒线长400码；同样于9月28日报道的《卫报》新闻给出的警方测量值是400米。警方公布的数字是400米。两种说法存在差异，并不意味着有两道警戒线。警方在行动初期表示，他们认为重大事件已得到控制，但这并不代表已经解除警报。8 6 85

接到预防性疏散建议的是约85户家庭，而非85名个人。居民前往赛伦塞斯特休闲中心；当地报道说，近30人周日晚在一家酒店过夜。居民当晚无法返家，警方预计会在当地停留数日。保释决定并不能证明警戒线此后已撤除，也不能证明每户居民都已返家。5 87 3

车辆搜查尚未查明的事项

《卫报》报道了调查人员的一项初步评估：厢式货车中的物质与简易爆炸装置相符。检验仍在进行，以确定疑似装置是否可用。目前没有公开的最终法证结果。早前有关发现一处爆炸物藏匿点的报道，未在现有警方通报中得到确认。机器人在货车旁作业的画面、有关爆响的报道，以及疑似受控爆炸的消息，都无法证明搜查发现了什么，更无法证明任何东西是否会爆炸。5 22 12

泰勒表示，调查人员夜间检查了现场，并提出了“多条新的调查线索”。这是对调查仍在进行的描述，并不意味着已经认定这些男子拥有可用炸弹、预定目标或外国支持者。尤其在此案中，这些区别很重要：据报道，车辆驶向费尔福德的方向，这解释了警方为何迅速应对，但单凭这一点并不能证明基地就是目的地。84 85

对于拦截行动之前发生了什么，目前也没有一致说法。BBC新闻9月27日报道称，此次行动并非由情报驱动；德国之声新闻同日则称，该行动由情报驱动。公开报道证实了警方立即收到警报，但并未证明此前不存在任何调查。两家媒体的说法都没有提供经核实的前期时间线来消除这一分歧。34 15 85

费尔福德是英国空军基地，由美军使用，包括用于打击伊朗导弹设施。航空周刊报道说，12架美国B-1B轰炸机驻扎在那里，支持在伊朗开展的行动。伊朗革命卫队7月警告称，用于此类打击的基地可能成为目标。调查人员已调查是否存在伊朗关联，同时也没有排除其他可能；目前没有任何一种可能得到证实。该基地的军事重要性意味着应谨慎调查，并不能证明伊朗指使了这些男子，也不能证明费尔福德是他们计划袭击的目标。3 28 9 5

唐纳德·特朗普总统称赞了此次行动，并表示嫌疑人已被调查很长时间，打算对他所谓的“我们的堡垒”造成“重大损害”。其他报道将他的说法译为美国港口。无论采用哪种表述，都不是警方关于目标的认定；他所称的长期监视也尚未得到核实。他说美国曾与英国合作，但不知道苏格兰场是否参与其中。与此同时，美国空军表示正在采取人员防护措施，美国驻英国大使馆则敦促美国人在英国保持谨慎。35 7 8 20

已知

  • 五名男子均获准警方保释，目前仍在接受调查。 84104

未知

  • 任何疑似装置是否可用、预定目标是什么，或是否有外国政府参与。

后续

  • 车辆检查结果的公开调查结论，以及居民获准返家的时间确认。

与周一早间相比，眼下的法律状态更加明朗；但现场和调查情况仍不清楚：专家作业期间，警方要求一些家庭离开，而现有报道既未确认他们已获准安全返家，也未明确说明警报由何引发。嫌疑人获准保释，并不能回答这两个问题。

播出原貌 12 行
  1. On September 27 we reported arrests near Fairford; now all five men are out on bail. About eighty-five households were advised to leave their homes, and their return has not been confirmed. What did the vehicles contain, and when can those families return?
  2. The five men remain under investigation. They have not been publicly named or charged, and bail is not an acquittal. Reports early on Monday still placed them in custody; the afternoon bail announcement superseded those reports. The men are British nationals from London, aged twenty-three to twenty-five. No individual age breakdown has been released. An early reference to detention without charge for up to fourteen days described a legal limit, not what happened to these men.
  3. Three vehicles were stopped near Whelford after a public report that they appeared to be heading towards RAF Fairford. Armed officers arrested the men first on suspicion of Explosives Act offences, then further arrested them on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act under section five of the Terrorism Act. These were arrests near the base, not evidence that anything happened inside it.
  4. Gloucestershire Police received the public report at about twelve forty-five on Sunday morning, British summer time. A farmer separately recalled calling emergency services just after one thirty after seeing three vans and a large group of people. It is not established whether she described a separate alert or the same one at a different time. Defence Secretary Wes Streeting said the caller had only a partial picture, but did not establish what, if anything, investigators knew beforehand.
  5. About eighty-five households or properties were advised to evacuate as a precaution—not eighty-five individual people. Evacuees went to a leisure centre in Cirencester, and nearly thirty people reportedly spent Sunday night in a hotel. Residents could not return that night. The suspects’ release does not establish that the cordon has been lifted or that every household is home.
  6. The cordon measurement differed: one account gave four hundred yards, another four hundred metres. The police measurement was four hundred metres around the vehicles. Army explosive-ordnance specialists examined them there. Police initially believed the major incident was contained, but that was not an all-clear; officers expected to remain for days.
  7. An initial assessment described material in the vans as consistent with improvised explosive devices, but testing of whether any suspected device could work was still ongoing. An earlier claim of an explosives cache has not been confirmed in the available police account. Images of robots at the vans, reported bangs and an apparent controlled explosion cannot settle what was found or whether anything could have detonated. Arrest on suspicion does not prove a working bomb or a selected target.
  8. Counter Terrorism Policing continues to lead the case. Its investigators examined the scene overnight and developed multiple new lines of enquiry. Police had not formally declared a terrorist incident in the available official account. Security around the British base, which hosts US forces, increased. The US Air Force took precautions for personnel; British and US authorities cooperated over the safety of personnel, families and neighbours. The US Embassy urged Americans in Britain to exercise caution.
  9. Early accounts directly conflicted over whether the response was intelligence-led. The public report explains the immediate police response, but does not rule out an earlier inquiry. No verified preparatory timeline resolves that disagreement. Suggestions of a connection to a separate RAF Brize Norton case also remain speculation.
  10. RAF Fairford has been used for US strikes on Iranian missile sites, including operations reported on March first. A specialist aviation account described twelve US B-1B bombers based there in support of operations in Iran. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard warned in July that bases used for such strikes could be targeted. That makes a possible foreign connection a line of inquiry, not proof of one: no link to Iran, Russia or another state has been established, and Fairford has not been established as the intended target.
  11. Donald Trump praised the operation and claimed the suspects had long been investigated and intended serious damage. His reference to a fort was rendered as a US port in some accounts; neither version establishes a police finding about a target. He said he did not know whether Scotland Yard was involved and promised more information soon. His account of longstanding surveillance remains unverified.
  12. The answer to the immediate question is limited: all five men are on bail and the investigation is open, but there is no definitive public finding that a viable device was present, no established motive or foreign sponsor, and no confirmed date for lifting the cordon or returning every evacuated household.

来源

119 个来源69 家媒体23 个视频3 篇通稿

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。