冲突 · 九谷市场遭袭

九谷家属安葬空袭遇难者，据报死亡人数升至50人

九谷市场空袭遇难者的家属已开始安葬亲人。据报死亡人数已达50人，但伤亡名册以及平民遭蓄意袭击的指控仍未有定论。

播出 文字 阅读需 7 分钟32 个来源HeyDay News Desk · About usWatch report
与 HeyDex 一起探索

通过 RSS 关注

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

译自英文原文。

新闻追踪第 3 天

1 篇报道19 家媒体32 个来源

  • 暂无标注日期的事件
  1. 第 1 次更新九谷家属安葬空袭遇难者，据报死亡人数升至50人当前位置

在全部伤亡情况尚未查明之际，家属已开始安葬九谷市场空袭的遇难者。缅甸若开邦9月28日（2026年）的袭击目前据报已造成50人死亡，至少58人受伤。但这些数字并非最终伤亡名册：已有一名伤者在接受治疗期间死亡，死亡人数因此上升；联合国人权事务办公室警告，数字还可能继续增加。1 24

路透社将死亡和受伤数字归因于若开军及当地救援人员韦亨昂。据报死者中包括妇女和儿童。其他救援人员和当地媒体的报道也支持死亡人数为50人的说法；截至9月30日，现有报道并未证实更高的具体数字。1 6 2

关键事实

  1. 50据报死亡人数，尚无最终名册 124
  2. 至少58人据报受伤人数；后续统计尚未核实一致 1
  3. 229月29日安葬的遇难者 2

袭击击中了九谷的印度市场及相邻的基萨帕纳迪桥，该地区由若开军控制。其他报道将这些地名写作India Market和Kacchapanadi Bridge。这些是同一地点的不同拼写，并不表明还有其他袭击地点。目击者称，轰炸发生在9月28日中午前后，约为格林尼治标准时间05:30；这仍是估算时间。7 17 23

这里是河畔商业中心，并非军事地图上的一个普通地点。路透社称，这个市场有200多家店铺，为多个社区提供服务。其他现有报道未能独立证实这一规模；这个数字也不代表被毁店铺的数量。据报遇难者包括摊贩、顾客、运输工人和其他平民——他们因工作和日常事务来到同一个拥挤场所。1 16 18

当地报道描述了两次空袭、建筑物起火以及被烧焦的市场。但报道无法证实涉及多少架飞机、机型、炸弹数量或重量，也无法说明有多少商家幸存。桥梁状况也没有经过核实：桥梁被列为袭击地点之一，并不能证明桥梁某一段坍塌或通道无法通行。这个共同交易中心遭到破坏显而易见，但其对交通和商业的长期影响尚未评估。7 3 17

仍在统计的死亡人数

不断变化的数字反映的是对同一次袭击后续情况的不同阶段报道。救援人员相关报道最初估计死亡人数约为30人。DVB早期报道援引若开军的说法，称至少33人死亡、36人受伤。到9月29日，DVB和UCA News报道称至少49人死亡、58人受伤；DVB的报道还提到，最初有22人被列为伤势危重。6 20 7 17

此后，发展传媒集团报道称，另一名伤势危重的伤者在接受治疗期间死亡，死亡人数因此升至50人。缅甸新日称，死者是一名在医院去世的伤者。《日本时报》另援引两名当地救援人员的话，称有50人死亡、58人受伤；《伊洛瓦底报》则援引若开军的说法，称有50人死亡、近60人受伤。24 29 6 3

部分报道尚未纳入这一增幅：《星报》9月30日的报道仍采用49人死亡的数字，而DVB同日的后续报道则采用50人。这些是不同时间点的报道，并不能证明最终名册彼此矛盾。据报的治疗期间死亡事件解释了人数上升，但无法确定各媒体何时更新了报道。21 2 24

受伤人数也需要同样谨慎看待。最初被列为伤势危重的22人已包含在据报的58名伤者之中，并非需要另行加上的一组人。此后有一人死亡，但没有经过核实、相互吻合的名册说明这起死亡如何影响伤者人数。若自动减去一人，或据此计算出确定的伤亡总数，就会强加报道并未提供的精确度。22 24

另据DVB后续报道及图片说明，若开联邦成员于9月29日安葬了22名遇难者遗体。安葬地点未予公开，只说是在若开军控制区内的某处。这些安葬者已计入死亡人数，不应再加到死亡人数中。现有报道无法确认那名治疗期间死亡的伤者是否在其中。2 24

谴责并不能确定袭击目标

联合国秘书长安东尼奥·古特雷斯谴责了据报发生的袭击；发言人斯特凡·迪雅里克在9月29日的记者会上转述了他的立场。安纳多卢通讯社报道称，古特雷斯“强烈谴责”针对平民的持续袭击。联合国人权事务高级专员沃尔克·图尔克也对空袭表示遗憾，并警告伤亡人数可能上升。这些是已公开的回应，并非对最终伤亡人数的独立核实。1 25 26

据报造成缅甸一处市场至少50人死亡的军方空袭令人痛心。

杰里米·劳伦斯，联合国人权事务高级专员办事处发言人 14

这句话是劳伦斯的原话，联合国在9月29日的日内瓦记录中保留了这段表述，并非图尔克直接说的话。联合国人权事务高级专员办事处的声明称，这次袭击是2021年2月政变以来若开邦最致命的袭击之一，但没有提供数值比较来确立精确的历史排名。14 16

据报道，这次袭击是缅甸军方发动的空袭。若开军进一步指称平民遭到蓄意袭击；这一涉及意图的指控，在现有证据中尚未得到证实。民用场所人群密集、平民死亡以及明显的破坏，都表明事件后果严重。但仅凭这些情况，无法还原袭击目标的决定过程，也无法确定下令者当时掌握的信息。1

路透社报道称，军政府没有发表评论。截至9月30日，现有报道无法证实军政府此后曾承认、否认或解释此事，也没有证实军政府曾宣称存在军事目标。也没有独立核实的调查还原出所用武器、命令或决策链条，或公布调查时间表。应当让这些信息空白保持可见，同时也不能掩盖眼前的后果：据报有数十人死亡、多人受伤，家属已开始安葬遇难者；袭击发生在一个服务周边社区的场所。1 2

本报道的消息来源

路透社：据报发生的袭击、伤亡情况及联合国回应。1 DVB：9月30日的谴责及安葬后续报道。2《伊洛瓦底报》：死亡人数升至50人。3安纳多卢通讯社：联合国人权事务高级专员谴责空袭。4

欧洲新闻台：49人死亡的伤亡报道。5《日本时报》：救援人员报告50人死亡。6 DVB：9月29日市场及桥梁伤亡情况更新。7《日本时报》：联合国对据报袭击表示担忧。8

《海峡时报》：联合国对据报50人死亡表示担忧。9 DVB：联合国对据报空袭表示担忧。10联合国：9月29日日常新闻发布会。11联合国新闻：有关缅甸及其他进展的世界新闻简报。12

联合国网络电视：9月29日日常新闻发布会。13 UNifeed：联合国人权事务高级专员办事处关于若开邦市场遭袭的记录。14联合国：《声明与致辞》汇编。15《国家论坛报》：转载图尔克的声明。16

UCA News：据报市场至少49人死亡。17 Progressive Voice：转载图尔克的声明。18 CRPH Support Group：关于联合国和英国谴责此事的报道。19 DVB：若开军早期伤亡情况报道。20

《星报》：9月30日的报道称49人死亡。21 CRPH Support Group：转载伤者治疗期间死亡的最新消息。22 NAMPA/法新社：随着死亡人数升至50人，家属收殓遗体。23发展传媒集团：一名伤者治疗期间死亡后，死亡人数升至50人。24

安纳多卢通讯社：秘书长的谴责。25安纳多卢通讯社：人权事务高级专员警告死亡人数可能上升。26 NAMPA/法新社：联合国回应市场空袭。27法国24台：家属收殓遇难者遗体。28

缅甸新日：据报有人在医院死亡。29 CRPH Support Group：国际谴责相关报道。30法国24台：救援人员更新伤亡情况。31《考索德英语版》：9月30日市场遭袭报道。32

播出原貌 13 行
  1. Families are burying victims of the airstrike that struck a crowded market.
  2. The reported death toll has reached fifty, with at least fifty-eight people wounded and women and children among the dead. The market served surrounding communities, bringing vendors, customers and transport workers into the same crowded space. What remains unresolved about the final human toll and whether civilians were deliberately targeted?
  3. The strike hit the Indian Market and adjoining Kissapanadi Bridge in Kyauktaw, in Myanmar's Rakhine State, on September twenty-eighth, twenty twenty-six. The area was under Arakan Army control. The market's name also appears as India Market, and the bridge as Kacchapanadi. These are different renderings of the same attack locations, not additional sites.
  4. The market reportedly contained more than two hundred shops and served multiple communities. That figure describes its scale before the attack, not the number of shops destroyed, and it lacks independent corroboration. People came here to earn a living, buy goods and move through town. The reported victims included vendors, customers, transport workers and other civilians.
  5. The attack's estimated timing is around midday, approximately five-thirty GMT. That is a witness estimate, not an independently verified exact time. Two airstrikes are described, but that does not establish how many aircraft flew, their types, how many bombs were dropped or what those bombs weighed.
  6. Another critically injured victim died during treatment, taking the reported death toll from forty-nine to fifty. The earlier estimates had put deaths at around thirty, then at least thirty-three, with thirty-six injured. September twenty-ninth accounts subsequently reached at least forty-nine dead and fifty-eight injured. Some September thirtieth coverage still carried forty-nine, while other follow-up accounts used fifty. These are successive snapshots of the same aftermath, not several separate attacks. The additional treatment death explains the increase without establishing that every count was updated at the same time.
  7. Twenty-two victims were buried on September twenty-ninth by members of the United League of Arakan. The burial took place at an undisclosed location in Arakan Army-controlled territory; no named cemetery, village or exact burial time is established. Those twenty-two are part of the reported deaths, not people to add to the toll. Separately, twenty-two of the fifty-eight injured were initially listed in critical condition. One subsequently died, but it is unknown whether that person was among those buried. The two figures describe different categories; they do not establish which individuals overlap.
  8. The wounded count also remains unreconciled. Accounts used fifty-eight, at least fifty-eight, or nearly sixty, without establishing a definitive register after the treatment death. Automatically subtracting one from the wounded, or calculating a final combined casualty total, would give the figures a precision they do not have. The casualty account is not an independently verified final register.
  9. Fire damaged the marketplace, leaving charred structures and extensive destruction. But the number of shops damaged or destroyed has not been established. Neither has the number of businesses still operating. The commercial loss reaches a hub used by several communities, but its longer-term effect on trade and access remains unquantified.
  10. The bridge's condition is another unanswered question. Its location beside the market does not establish structural failure. There is no verified assessment of whether a span failed or whether the crossing remained passable.
  11. UN Secretary-General António Guterres condemned the reported strike. UN human rights chief Volker Türk also deplored the military airstrikes and warned that the toll could rise. The attack was characterized as one of the deadliest in Rakhine since the February twenty twenty-one coup, but no numerical historical comparison establishes a precise ranking. The condemnation is an established public response; it does not independently authenticate every casualty figure or settle the targeting decision.
  12. Whether civilians were deliberately targeted is not yet confirmed. A crowded civilian location, civilian deaths and visible destruction do not by themselves establish the complete targeting decision or what information those ordering the strike possessed. No independent reconstruction identifies the aircraft, weapons, orders, asserted military objective or decision-making chain. The junta did not comment in the initial account, and no subsequent acknowledgment, denial, explanation or claimed target is established through September thirtieth.
  13. The known human toll is therefore fifty reported deaths, with no specific higher figure established through September thirtieth. The final death and injury counts, and the allegation of deliberate civilian targeting, remain unresolved. No announced investigation timetable is established. The human rights office's warning remains consequential: the death toll could still rise as injured victims receive treatment.

来源

32 个来源19 家媒体1 篇通稿

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。