司法
卡曼承认藏匿泰国少女遗体。谋杀案仍未解决
这名澳大利亚男子承认藏匿17岁的敦查诺克·东霍姆拉遗体,但对另外三项指控提出抗辩。12月的证据听证将检验尚未解决的案件争议;她家人的赔偿索赔仍未有定论。
原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载
译自英文原文。
新闻追踪第 3 天
1 篇报道41 家媒体74 个来源2 个视频
承认藏匿一名少女的遗体,究竟能为她的死定下什么?在西蒙·彼得·卡曼案中,这只涉及一项指控——既不是谋杀指控,也不是他的正当防卫主张,更不是她家人正在索求的赔偿。
这名澳大利亚男子于2026年10月12日在泰国芭堤雅府法院改为承认藏匿17岁的敦查诺克·东霍姆拉遗体罪。他仍否认故意谋杀,以及两项彼此独立的诱拐未成年人指控。目前没有任何指控——包括藏匿遗体罪——被报告已有定罪或判刑。9 25
此次庭审还为这起有争议的案件排定了时间表:证据听证定于12月8日、9日和11日举行。10月12日是处理认罪答辩和证人安排的程序性听证,并非控方证人开始作证。这一区别说明,尽管有了重要承认,庭审仍尚未检验敦查诺克死亡的争议情节。9 4
法院日程
ABC在10月12日最初的报道中称,卡曼已同意认罪;《芭堤雅新闻》随后发布的法庭报道则称,他是在法庭上改为认罪。12月的日期也取代了ABC在10月11日的报道中较为笼统的预期,即庭审将在年底前举行。这些进展依据的是同期报道,而非经独立查阅的法庭记录。1 2 9
认罪并未解决的问题
卡曼在9月被起诉后,对全部四项指控均表示不认罪。在10月的听证会上,法官提到监控录像证据有力,并鼓励他承认藏匿遗体罪,称这可能成为从轻处理的依据。目前没有宣布任何从轻判决,也没有宣布任何判决。23 9
这四项指控必须分别看待。除故意谋杀外,检方还指控他藏匿、隐瞒、移动或毁坏尸体,以掩盖死亡或死亡原因。一项诱拐未成年人指控涉及为不当目的,将年龄超过15岁但未满18岁的人从父母、监护人或照护者处带走;另一项则涉及为不当目的带走这一年龄段的人。据称,即使青少年同意,这两项指控也适用。卡曼对这两项指控以及谋杀指控均提出抗辩。23 9
据报道,故意谋杀罪的刑罚范围包括15–20年监禁、终身监禁或死刑。这些只是他被定罪后可能面临的刑罚,并非对法院将作出何种判决的预测。部分报道使用“有预谋”的说法,但不应将其视为已独立核实、与故意谋杀指控等同的表述。23 9
家人称敦查诺克为凯克。她是父母唯一的孩子,来自泰国东北部的加拉信府。家人称她是和朋友到芭堤雅度假的。ABC采用的拼法是Tunchanok Donhomla;其他报道则将她的名字拼作Thanchanok。3 52 10
警方和救援志愿者在考马科地区铁路轨道附近发现了她的遗体,遗体装在一个被丢弃的行李箱内,距公寓约四公里。报道指出,遗体是在6月27日凌晨前后发现的,距监控录像拍到她约两天。这段时间间隔无法确定她的死亡时间。卡曼在同一凌晨时段于素万那普机场被捕,当时他正准备登上飞往珀斯的捷星航班。39 40 72
警方详细时间线所列的逮捕时间早于报道所称的遗体发现时间。逐分钟的事件顺序尚未经过独立确认,因此不能贸然认定警方是先发现行李箱、随后才逮捕他。39
卡曼的说法仍有争议。他声称,敦查诺克在一次金钱纠纷中拿出一把刀;他说自己捏的是她的下颌而非脖子,也无意杀害她。警方早先对其陈述的描述则称,他承认勒住她的脖子,但无意杀人。这些实质不同的说法尚未得到裁定。60 29 10
据报道,尸检结果指出死因为窒息,并发现颅内脑损伤。部分法庭报道还提到下颌骨骨折,但尸检摘要并非都包含这一细节。医学证据和正当防卫主张仍有待在预定庭审程序中检验。承认藏匿遗体本身并不能回答这些问题。45 10
索求赔偿,不是给生命标价
美元金额存在尚未解释的出入。ABC在10月11日的报道中称金额超过$51,000,ASEAN NOW明确标注早先的金额为澳元。ABC在10月12日的报道中称金额超过$70,000;《芭堤雅新闻》则称165万泰铢的索赔约合A$70,000。没有经核实的更正、汇率说明或泰铢索赔金额变更能够解释这一差异。这并不能证明家人提高了索赔金额。2 13 1 9
家人通过泰国政府法律服务机构寻求协助。《芭堤雅邮报》称,该机构是春武里府权利保护与法律援助办公室芭堤雅分处。澳大利亚新闻网站转载的报道将其称为“澳大利亚法律援助”,与上述身份信息相矛盾,且未经证实。16 14
没人想要这笔钱。他们想要的是那个人重获生命。她本该拥有一个远不止于此的未来。
她的父亲通猜·东霍姆拉(大家称他为杰克)希望法律得到最充分的适用;他表达了对死刑的倾向,同时表示由法院作出决定。她的姑妈米兰特里·塔纳猜和其他亲属称,他们“很欣慰”卡曼对谋杀指控提出抗辩,因为他们希望整起案件得到全面审理。这些是家人的意愿,并非有罪认定。10 24
证据听证计划安排控方证人作证约两天半,辩方作证半天,卡曼拟作为辩方唯一证人。他的律师索拉西特·蓬因预计判决将在此后约一个月作出,也就是2027年1月前后。这仍只是估计;判决日期尚未确定。12月8日是首个已确认的证据听证日期。9 10
承认藏匿遗体使争议范围缩小,但并未终结争议。法院仍须裁定三项有争议的指控,家人的经济索赔也仍未有定论。
本篇法庭报道的消息来源
播出原貌 27 行
- Simon Carman admits hiding a seventeen-year-old's body, but denies murdering her.
- Her family is seeking compensation for funeral expenses and the financial support she would have provided her father. Carman faces a contested murder case that could carry the death penalty.
- The court must still decide how she died and whether Carman committed murder.
- Carman changed his plea in court on concealing Tunchanok Donhomla's body. She was seventeen and known as Cake. He continues to deny the other three charges. He hasn't been convicted or sentenced on any charge.
- Pattaya Provincial Court set the witness schedule at the October twelfth hearing. Judges dealt with pleas and plans for testimony. Prosecution witnesses will begin giving evidence in December, on three dates now fixed by the court.
- Carman had denied every charge after his September indictment. At the October hearing, the judge referred to strong CCTV evidence. The judge encouraged him to admit concealment as a possible basis for leniency, and Carman changed that plea.
- Prosecutors brought four charges. They allege intentional murder and concealment of a corpse to hide the death or its cause. They also brought two distinct charges involving taking a teenager for indecent purposes. Carman denies both minor-taking allegations.
- One concerns taking a minor away from parents, a guardian or a carer. The other concerns taking the teenager for indecent purposes. Both cover someone older than fifteen but younger than eighteen, even with that person's consent.
- If convicted of intentional murder, Carman could receive fifteen to twenty years in prison, life imprisonment or death.
- Cake was her parents' only child, from Kalasin province in northeastern Thailand. Her family says she arrived in Pattaya around June sixteenth for a holiday with a friend. They have rejected descriptions of her as a sex worker.
- Carman is an Australian former truck driver associated with Perth and formerly Ballarat. He had lived in Thailand for years. He was forty-five at the October hearing and turns forty-six later that month. He's held at Pattaya Remand Prison after being refused bail.
- CCTV showed Cake and Carman entering his condominium on Jomtien Second Road early on June twenty-fifth. Police and rescue volunteers later found her body in the Khao Makok area, about four kilometres from the condominium.
- The footage showed them walking hand-in-hand through the lobby toward the lifts, at about half past three in the morning. What happened inside the apartment is part of the contested case.
- Her unclothed body was inside a discarded suitcase in long grass near railway tracks. The discovery was in the overnight period leading into June twenty-seventh, roughly two days after the CCTV sighting. That interval doesn't tell us when she died.
- Police arrested Carman at Suvarnabhumi Airport while he was preparing to board a Jetstar flight to Perth. His arrest and the discovery of Cake's body both fall within that same overnight period in late June.
- The police timing places his arrest before the discovery, but the precise sequence isn't clear. It can't safely be assumed that finding the suitcase first led police to apprehend him.
- Carman says she pulled a knife during a money dispute, and he squeezed her jaw without intending to kill her. Police earlier described his statement as admitting strangling her without intending to kill. Those different accounts still await testing in court.
- The autopsy findings identify suffocation and an internal brain injury. A broken jaw was also described in court. The medical evidence and Carman's self-defence account have yet to be tested through the scheduled testimony. His concealment plea leaves responsibility for her death unresolved.
- Cake's family is seeking one point six five million baht, about seventy thousand five hundred Australian dollars. The claim covers funeral costs and the future financial support she would have provided her father. The court hasn't awarded compensation.
- The earlier dollar figure was more than fifty-one thousand Australian dollars. Newer estimates run from about seventy thousand to seventy thousand five hundred. Nobody has explained the difference. The underlying demand is one point six five million baht.
- The family sought a lawyer through a Thai government rights-protection and legal-assistance service. The assisting office is its Pattaya branch in Chonburi province.
- A legal-assistance official says compensation depends on a criminal conviction. The official says the linked civil claim can be heard alongside the criminal proceedings without separate court fees. The family's eventual payment still depends on the court's decisions.
- Her cousin, Khanitta Nongkhampoon, said, “Nobody wants money from this. They want the person's life back. She should have had a future that went much further than this.” Relatives have rejected treating compensation as an exchange for their dignity.
- Her father, Thongchai Donhomla, known as Jack, expressed his anger by saying, “I want to punch him.” He wants the fullest application of the law and favours the death penalty, while leaving the decision to the court.
- Her aunt, Miruntree Thanachai, and other relatives want maximum punishment. They've said they're grateful Carman is contesting murder because they want the full case tested.
- The court scheduled evidence hearings for December eighth, ninth and eleventh. Prosecutors have about two and a half days for their witnesses. The defence has about half a day, with Carman proposed as its sole witness.
- His lawyer, Sorasit Pongin, was retained by Carman's mother. Pongin expects a verdict roughly a month after the December proceedings, around January twenty twenty-seven. The court hasn't fixed a verdict date.
来源
74 个来源41 家媒体2 个视频2 篇通稿
来源地图
追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联;下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。
来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。
译文更新于
修订记录
- r1首次发布。
