跳到内容
现在

报道

七年刑期只服三年:宗教领袖之子悄然获释

一位宗教领袖的儿子在七年刑期中服刑约三年后悄然出狱,受保护证人却未获通知。

文字 阅读需 5 分钟 · 41 个来源

原语言视频

译自英文原文。

三年。这就是一名因性侵寄宿学校学生而被判七年监禁的人,在家族节日聚会上悄然重获自由所经历的刑期差额。Moch Subchi Azal Tsani,广为人知的名字是 Mas Bechi,本应服刑七年。距离他出狱已近一年时,他被拍到在案件发生地的社区里自由行动;而那些因作证指控他而受到证人保护的年轻女性,却从未被告知他已经出狱⁠2⁠9。

此人并非普通教师。他是东爪哇省宗邦县普洛索的 Pondok Pesantren Majma'al Bahrain Shiddiqiyyah 宗教寄宿学校负责人 Kiai Muhammad Mukhtar Mukthi 的儿子。案发时,他本人也是父亲寄宿学校的一名教师,曾任副校长。在这个封闭的世界里,教育、居住、礼拜和服从都围绕创办家族展开,精神权威影响着工作、婚姻、声誉以及参与宗教生活的机会⁠2⁠10。

判处七年,已服刑三年

拘留始于 2022年7月8日。泗水地方法院于 2022年11月17日宣读七年刑期,随后上诉法院维持原判。BBC 英文报道将罪行描述为性侵一名女学生,即一名 santriwati。关于同一项定罪,印度尼西亚媒体报道使用了法律和道德色彩更重的术语 pencabulan 和 pemerkosaan,即猥亵和强奸;其中一份报道称,他猥亵了五名 santriwati,实际只服刑约三年。各报道对庭审受害者人数及确切法律定性说法不一,无法统一⁠13⁠33⁠2。

7年2022年11月判处的刑期 2
~3年获释前已服刑时间 9
24,4722025年全国性暴力案件 38

他于 2025年8月从玛琅一级监狱获准假释,印尼语称 pembebasan bersyarat。一家印度尼西亚商业媒体报道称,假释自 2025年8月15日起生效。其他后续报道则将日期定为 2025年8月20日。惩教总局和玛琅一级监狱负责人 Christo Victor Nixon Toar 确认了这一身份,称假释依据移民与惩教部长的法令,按照适用规定批准,并坚称这并非完全释放或无条件释放,即 bukan bebas murni⁠12⁠16⁠8。

从法律上说,假释仍须接受监督。受害者不知情的监督无法让人安心。BBC 的叙事框架与官方所称的常规假释截然相反:他服刑不到刑期的一半便秘密提前获释,直到记者主动追查才被发现⁠9⁠17。

从牢房到自由

  1. 2022年7月8日

    因在父亲的学校内实施虐待而被拘留,等待审判

    16
  2. 2022年11月17日

    泗水地方法院判处七年监禁

    13
  3. 2025年8月

    获准假释,离开玛琅一级监狱

    29
  4. 2026年3月

    在家族住宅的开斋节聚会上被秘密拍摄

    3
  5. 2026年9月20日

    拍摄内容在他获释近一年后公开

    2

摄像画面让关于保密的指控有了具体依据。BBC Eye 记者追踪到 Bechi,并于 3 月在他家族住宅举行的开斋节活动上进行秘密拍摄,证实公众以为仍在服七年刑期的他正在自由活动。记者向他提出相关指控,他没有回应。画面于 2026年9月20日和21日公开⁠3⁠4。

曾出庭指证他并受到证人保护的前学生,没有获知他已获释。对于那些冒着在尊崇等级体系中遭到报复的风险而作证的年轻女性来说,得知这位宗教领袖之子已获自由的消息来自媒体而非国家,会让她们在学校活动、市场、清真寺和家族院落周边的日常生活中再次陷入恐惧,因为影响力传播得很快⁠9。

如今,另一项指控与定罪并列。一名身份标记为 Ira 的女性称,Bechi 多年来强奸并性侵她。这一说法已向 Bechi 提出,但他没有回应。目前尚无针对该指控的起诉、审判或裁定。各份摘要对于她的全名及详细经历是否已见于记录,表述不一。这是有待调查的已报道证言,而非经裁定的事实⁠7。

伤害受害者的正义感

印度尼西亚乌里玛理事会 30

理事会表示,释放 Bechi 伤害了受害者的正义感,并建议他不要回到寄宿学校环境中。妇女权利活动人士表示,此次释放伤害了正义感;印度尼西亚妇女关怀社区(Komunitas Perempuan Peduli Indonesia)主席 Ya'qud Ananda Gudban 称,原先判处七年的判决从一开始就有缺陷。妇女赋权与儿童保护部长 Arifah Fauzi 表示,部长办公室希望确认有关法律身份决定的理由⁠5⁠30⁠33。

更广泛的背景说明了为何在宗教寄宿学校内部开展报道如此困难。家长决定是否送女儿住校,女学生决定是否举报同时也是宗教名人的教师,教师决定是否作证佐证——所有人都在观察权力是否会缩短刑期、压下警示。国家暴力侵害妇女委员会 Komnas Perempuan 于 2026年5月9日宣布,宗教寄宿学校中的性暴力已构成紧急情况,并表示女学生来此是为了学习,而不是成为受害者;委员会指出,事件反复发生、基于宗教的权力关系以及受害者保护机制薄弱。该委员会曾于 2025年10月27日发布关于确保事件不再发生的声明,之后还公布了对西努沙登加拉省宗教寄宿学校的监测结果⁠20⁠21⁠19。

全国范围内,2025年记录了24,472起性暴力案件,是侵害妇女案件中数量最高的类别,其中网络形式占主导。这一总数涵盖所有场所,并非宗教寄宿学校案件数。2025年10月引用的一项估算称,超过40,000名宗教寄宿学校学生面临遭受性暴力的风险;这是暴露风险估算,并非已报告的宗教寄宿学校事件统计。目前可查资料中不存在经过审计的全国宗教寄宿学校案件登记册。西努沙登加拉省宗教事务办公室推动的举措,以及龙目岛和苏门答腊省苏梅内普县宗教寄宿学校的个案,均属不同档案,并非针对 Bechi 案采取的行动⁠38⁠41⁠37⁠22⁠24。

已知

  • 七年刑期,服刑约三年后假释出狱 2
  • 作证的受保护证人未获告知其获释 9

未知

  • 没有公开的法令、减刑计算、假释条件或监督记录
  • 关于多年遭强奸的新指控是否会引发正式调查

后续

  • 惩教部门是否会公布假释条件、监督记录以及未通知事件的情况
  • 政府是否会下令全面调查宗教寄宿学校的保障措施和禁令

来源27

在此处引用的来源中,BBC News最先发布,比本报道播出早38小时。
  1. BBC News
  2. HeyDay News

26家媒体未注明日期:BBC Newskomnasperempuan.go.idCRBC NewsAntara NewsdetikKalimantanIDN Times

按媒体查看所有来源

来自 27 家媒体的 41 个来源· 引用最多的优先

播出原貌
  1. A convicted boarding-school abuser is walking free after about three years.
  2. His seven-year term for abusing a student inside his father's religious school ended quietly in freedom. Young women placed under state protection after testifying never received warning he was out.
  3. How did seven years become three, why were protected witnesses left uninformed, and what happens to the new rape allegation now on record?
  4. Moch Subchi Azal Tsani, widely called Mas Bechi, received seven years for sexually abusing a female student inside his father's boarding school. He spent about three years inside. Detention ran from 8 July 2022. The Surabaya District Court read the seven-year sentence on 17 November 2022. That verdict was later upheld on appeal.
  5. The man is the son of Kiai Muhammad Mukhtar Mukthi, caretaker-head of Pondok Pesantren Majma'al Bahrain Shiddiqiyyah in Ploso, Jombang, East Java. At the time of the offences he was himself a teacher and former deputy head inside that pesantren, a closed world where education, residence, worship and obedience center on the founding family.
  6. Undercover cameras filmed Bechi at an Idul Fitri event at his family home in March, establishing that a man the public believed to be serving seven years was moving freely in the community that produced the case. Confronted with the allegations, he did not respond. The pictures became public on 20 and 21 September 2026, almost a year after he left Malang Class I Prison.
  7. Prison authorities describe the August 2025 exit as conditional release, pembebasan bersyarat, by decree of the Minister of Immigration and Corrections. The head of Malang Class I Prison, Christo Victor Nixon Toar, confirmed the status and said it followed applicable provisions. He insisted it was not a full or pure release, bukan bebas murni. In law conditional release still carries supervision. Supervision that victims do not know about cannot reassure.
  8. Two victim counts exist for the same conviction: one female student and five female students. Two legal labels exist: sexual assault and the stronger terms pencabulan and pemerkosaan. Two dates exist for the same release: 15 August 2025 and 20 August 2025. The differences are unresolved and change how the public understands scale, crime and timing.
  9. Former students who testified against him and were placed under witness protection were not informed of his release. For young women who risked retaliation inside a reverential hierarchy to give evidence, learning from journalism rather than the state that the son of the kiai was free reopens fear in daily life around school events, markets, mosques and family compounds where influence travels fast.
  10. The abuse happened inside the Shiddiqiyyah compound in Ploso, Jombang. The sentence was read in Surabaya. The time was served in Malang Class I Prison. The freedom was documented at the family home. One corridor in East Java links the school, the court, the cell and the celebration.
  11. A separate allegation now stands beside the conviction. A woman identified as Ira says Bechi raped and sexually abused her over years. That account was put to Bechi without response. No charge, trial or finding has been established on that allegation. It stands as reported testimony demanding investigation, not as adjudicated fact.
  12. The wider setting explains why reporting inside pesantren is so hard. Spiritual authority shapes jobs, marriages, reputations and access to religious life. Parents deciding whether to send daughters to board, students deciding whether to report a teacher who is also a religious notable, teachers deciding whether to corroborate — all watch whether power shortens punishment and silences warning.
  13. The council said the release wounds the victims' sense of justice and advised that Bechi not return to the pesantren environment. Women's rights activists said the release wounded justice, with Ya'qud Ananda Gudban, chair of Komunitas Perempuan Peduli Indonesia, saying the original seven-year verdict was flawed from the start. Minister for Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Arifah Fauzi said the ministry wanted to confirm the reasoning behind the legal-status decision.
  14. Komnas Perempuan, the national commission on violence against women, declared sexual violence in pesantren an emergency on 9 May 2026, saying female santri come to study, not to become victims, citing recurrence, spiritually based power relations and weak victim-protection mechanisms. It had issued a release on 27 October 2025 on ensuring non-recurrence and later published monitoring of pesantren in West Nusa Tenggara.
  15. Nationally it recorded 24,472 cases of sexual violence in 2025, the highest category of violence against women, with online forms dominant. That total covers all settings and is not a pesantren count. An estimate cited in October 2025 that more than 40,000 santri are vulnerable to sexual violence is an exposure estimate, not a tally of reported pesantren incidents. No audited national register of pesantren cases exists in available material. A religious-affairs office push in West Nusa Tenggara and separate Lombok and Sumenep pesantren cases are distinct files and not action in the Bechi case.
  16. By what calculation of detention credit, remissions and parole eligibility did seven years imposed in November 2022 become conditional release in mid-August 2025 remains undocumented, with no published decree, conditions or supervision record. Why protected witnesses were not notified remains unexplained. No formal protected investigation into Ira's allegation with a public charging decision has been shown. No review of the release and no full inquiry into pesantren safeguards — mandatory reporting, independent inspections, external complaint channels, bans on convicted abusers returning, funding for protection and recovery — has been documented. The settled fact is stark: a seven-year sentence for abusing a student in his father's school meant about three years inside, followed by quiet freedom discovered only because cameras filmed it.

译文更新于

近期播出