• 新报道Two people killed in separate Saskatchewan crashes
  • 新报道Free flu and COVID-19 shots available to Saskatchewan residents six months and older
  • 新报道Roughriders fall to fourth after 44-24 loss, face conditional playoff elimination
  • 新报道Prince Albert police investigate death of 20-year-old man
  • 新报道Saskatchewan series Copper Hill Road plans filming in Indian Head
  • 新报道Ontario teen draws on health challenges for children’s book about courage
  • 新报道Bruno golf club plans $160,000 replacement of turf from old Taylor Field
  • 新报道Poland confirms two detentions in Starlink station arson case; later reports of two more unconfirmed
  • 新报道Senate proceedings against Sara Duterte narrowed to one impeachment charge after three withdrawals
  • 持续更新Pope Leo XIV agrees to surgery after lung nodule found — 0 个来源

司法 · 驾驶舱袭击持续报道 · 第 2 篇，共 3 篇

Flydubai 机长在阿布扎比康复，袭击调查转至阿联酋；与伊朗的关联尚无证据

沙特的初步调查认定副驾驶袭击了机长，机长 Smit Machchhar 正在阿布扎比康复。案件移交阿联酋后有了进展，但这并不能证明动机、坠机意图或与伊朗有关联。

播出 文字 阅读需 12 分钟185 个来源

通过 RSS 关注

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

译自英文原文。

持续报道第 3 天

3 篇报道268 家媒体513 个来源86 个视频

完整报道
  • 暂无标注日期的事件
  1. 第 1 次更新是什么迫使迪拜航空航班安全改道？坠机企图指控仍未得到证实
  2. 第 2 次更新Flydubai 机长在阿布扎比康复，袭击调查转至阿联酋；与伊朗的关联尚无证据当前位置
  3. 第 3 次更新迪拜航空副驾驶涉嫌将本·古里安航站楼作为袭击目标。他如何通过审查？较新

自上次报道以来的变化

44 小时后

当时

是什么迫使迪拜航空航班安全改道？坠机企图指控仍未得到证实

我们当时说尚无定论的问题

  1. 驾驶舱内的行动经过、飞行员的身体状况、完整伤者人数、是否有人被捕，以及乘客后续行程仍未查明。

    尚无定论

    两名飞行员受伤，机长正在阿布扎比康复，被拘留的嫌疑人已移交阿联酋，乘客已抵达以色列。完整伤情清单和驾驶舱内的确切经过仍未查明。 14812935920

  2. 由航空公司或调查机构直接发布、解释事件及其后果的最新消息。

    已有答案

现在

沙特的初步调查认定副驾驶袭击了机长，机长 Smit Machchhar 正在阿布扎比康复。案件移交阿联酋后有了进展，但这并不能证明动机、坠机意图或与伊朗有关联。

此后已有答案

  1. 由航空公司或调查机构直接发布、解释事件及其后果的最新消息。

    沙特内政部 10 月 1 日的初步调查认定，副驾驶袭击了机长，并称两名飞行员已返回阿联酋。阿联酋检方已启动调查，但尚未公布最终动机或意图认定。 148124159

机长 Smit Machchhar 目前仍然在世，情况稳定，并在阿布扎比一家医院康复。此前，他从迪拜飞往特拉维夫的航班发生紧急情况，随后在沙特阿拉伯安全降落。Machchhar 最初在塔布克接受治疗，据报头部和手部受伤，并接受了手术。到 2026 年 10 月 2 日，一名特使在陈述中称他“面带笑容、有说有笑、谈笑自如”。他的康复是这场事件最清晰的人身后果；在这趟航班上，乘客能否脱险取决于援助能否及时抵达驾驶舱。16 129

调查也有了进展。沙特内政部 10 月 1 日表示，初步调查发现，Flydubai FZ1073 航班的副驾驶袭击了机长，导致两人都受伤。两名飞行员随后在阿联酋安全人员陪同下返回阿联酋；美联社报道称，嫌疑人于 10 月 1 日星期四晚些时候被移交。袭击如今是调查的初步认定，但动机尚未查明。148 124 3

HeyDay News 于 9 月 30 日报道这起紧急事件时，我们确认飞机已安全改降塔布克，乘客被描述为安全且人数已核实。关于持刀袭击和蓄意坠机的说法尚未得到证实。最新的调查认定指出了谁袭击了谁，但这既非法院判决，也不是对袭击者是否意图摧毁飞机的最终裁定。

10 月 1 日，阿联酋总检察长 Hamad Saif Al Shamsi 下令由专门的公诉人员会同联邦民航总局和其他相关机构展开调查。调查范围包括事件经过、动机、是否涉及恐怖主义、事前策划和外部指使。现有报道未确认具体刑事指控，也未公开嫌疑人姓名。以色列当局希望在嫌疑人移交后对其进行问询，但尚无证据证实问询已完成或已安排具体日期。156 181 178 150

那扇让援助进入驾驶舱的门

乘客的说法称，身受重伤的机长打开或解锁了驾驶舱门，让其他人得以进入。据报乘客和机组人员制服了袭击者，将他拉出驾驶舱，并用耳机线把他捆起来。据报，两名非执勤飞行员乘客协助重新控制飞机并完成降落。究竟由谁最先制服袭击者、操纵控制装置并执行降落，目前仍缺乏最终还原。168 20 1

我抓住袭击者，用胳膊勒住他的脖子，然后把他拉了出去。

Yaniv Hayun 161

Hayun 的姓氏也有 Hayoun 这一拼法。他说，随后自己返回驾驶舱，向后拉操纵杆，之后由另一名飞行员接手。他的证词描述了一次非同寻常的干预，但并非对飞机反应的独立核实测量。据报，一名乘客牙医为流血的机长进行了治疗；报道中他的名字有 Shota Musayv 和 Shota Musayev 两种写法。具体治疗方式没有记录。161 2 162

这名牙医还回忆说，被制服的嫌疑人曾要求别人杀了他。这段回忆可能对调查人员有参考价值，但不能据此确立临床诊断或动机。乘客 Miriam Okayion 描述了飞机摇晃、机上有血迹，以及她担心飞机会坠毁的情形。这些说法传达了当时的恐惧，却无法厘清驾驶舱内的行动经过。2 9

一些报道颠倒了飞行员的角色。NBC News 10 月 1 日报道称，Netanyahu 曾讲述一名飞行员刺伤副驾驶；BBC 当天称 Machchhar 是受伤的副驾驶。ABC News 10 月 2 日则称，副驾驶刺伤了机长。沙特方面的初步调查认定厘清了关键区别：Machchhar 是受伤的机长，副驾驶是被指控的袭击者。此前关于角色的说法已被更新取代，并非与当前调查结论并存的说法。19 17 2 148

急剧下降，不代表意图已明

9 月 30 日，FZ1073 从迪拜国际机场飞往本-古里安机场，途中改降塔布克的苏丹·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹王子国际机场。Flightradar24 显示事发时飞机位于沙特阿拉伯上空；其他航线报道则称，飞机经过沙特与约旦交界区域，并从约旦领空折返。目的地是以色列，并不能证明袭击发生在以色列上空；目前也无法准确判断驾驶舱内各项行动发生时飞机的具体位置。73 106 16

飞机曾急速下降，但公开报道中的测量数据并不一致。NBC News 10 月 1 日的报道给出的数据是，飞机约在 1 分钟内从 33,000 英尺降至 17,000 英尺。BBC Verify 10 月 1 日的分析则称，飞机在大约 90–100 秒内从 34,000 英尺降至约 16,600 英尺。同样发表于 10 月 1 日的 Channel 4 News 报道称，飞机在约 30 秒内下降了 14,000 英尺。这些数据可能涵盖不同航段，也可能源于读数不一致；目前无法取得带时间戳、可相互匹配的数据。不能将这些数字取平均值并视为确定的飞行轨迹，单凭高度下降也无法证明机组有意坠机。1 7 11

Flightradar24 记录的应答机代码变化顺序为 7700 → 7500 → 7700：一般紧急情况、非法干扰，随后再次发出一般紧急情况信号。具体切换时间及由谁选择代码仍不清楚。以色列出于预防目的出动了战斗机，但没有证据证实发生了特定拦截或护航行动。非法干扰警报可以解释当时为何发出警报，却无法说明动机。106 46

航空安全网（Aviation Safety Network）的一条记录将涉事飞机识别为波音 737 MAX 8，注册号 A6-FKF，并将其损坏程度列为严重。完整的航空公司飞机声明尚未独立证实这一身份信息。报道和照片提到机尾或方向舵受损，但现有技术检查资料无法确认损坏范围、发生时间或原因。安全降落并不意味着飞机没有受损。135 138

报道所称的起飞和降落时间，也尚未根据针对这起事件的记录完全核实。机上人数同样如此：ABC News 10 月 2 日报道称，机上有 174 名乘客和 8 名机组人员，按此计算共 182 人。Channel 4 10 月 1 日的报道则称，机上 180 人全部生还。NBC 此前所说的“近 200 人”只是约数，并非权威的乘客名单。具体人数构成更有参考价值，但尚未证实为最终总数。2 6 1

目前没有死亡报告。NBC 报道称有 3 名乘客受轻伤，而其他报道则称乘客未受伤或没有严重伤情。“没有严重伤情”可以与轻伤并存，但“无人受伤”在此不能被视作完整的医疗结论。两名执飞飞行员都受了伤，嫌疑人的康复情况则没有类似的最终更新。6 20 148

影响不止于这趟航班

乘客随后乘坐救援或替代航班抵达以色列。据报他们于 9 月 30 日约当地时间 18:40 抵达本-古里安机场，但这一确切时间尚未得到独立证实。他们最终完成后续旅程，回答了我们首篇报道中尚未解决的一个实际问题。59 31

Flydubai 在调查期间暂停迪拜—特拉维夫航线，目前没有经过核实的固定停飞期限或复航日期。针对滞留迪拜的 1,800 名旅客的遣返航班获准于 10 月 2 日开始。这一数字不是 FZ1073 航班的乘客人数。据称，El Al、Israir 和 Arkia 正计划安排救援航班；获得批准和制定计划并不能证明航班已实际起飞或抵达。154 153 17

以色列正在调查，指派一名阿曼籍飞行员是否违反了一项航空协议。报道称，该协议允许与以色列有外交关系国家的飞行员在以色列降落。阿曼与以色列没有正式外交关系。目前尚无证据证实存在违规。国籍与这项据称的资格规则有关，但不能作为该飞行员个人动机的证据。武器、安检和驾驶舱舱门控制方面的问题也仍未得到答复。16 9 18

以色列官员提出了恐怖主义的解读。国防部长 Israel Katz 称这是一起企图发动的圣战恐怖袭击；Netanyahu 提到可能存在伊斯兰主义思想灌输的迹象，并称蓄意坠机“很可能”是袭击者的意图，同时承认尚未得出最终结论。一名官员声称嫌疑人曾在社交媒体发表反犹言论，但没有提供相关帖文作为依据。这些评估尚未成为经独立证实的调查结论。31 17 2

Netanyahu 表示，现在判断伊朗是否参与为时尚早。尽管如此，在被问及是否可能与伊朗有关时，Trump 回答说：“根据我听到的情况，是的”，并警告称，如果伊朗负有责任，就会遭到“非常猛烈的打击”。他还表示调查仍在继续。截至 10 月 2 日，没有调查机构的认定证实这起事件与伊朗有关。17 2 5 183

这篇持续更新报道的消息来源

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75

76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100

101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125

126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150

151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175

176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185

播出原貌 28 行
  1. On September 30 we reported FZ1073 landed safely, with its cause unresolved. Now investigators identify a cockpit assault. Both injured pilots have been moved to the United Arab Emirates, and the flight suspension leaves 1,800 other travellers awaiting repatriation. What does the assault finding establish—and what remains unproven about a crash attempt or an Iran connection?
  2. Assault is now a preliminary investigative finding, not merely an allegation surrounding an unexplained diversion. The co-pilot assaulted the captain during the flight, and both were injured. That finding is not a court judgment. It does not establish a formally filed criminal charge, a terrorist motive, or a final determination that the attacker deliberately tried to destroy the aircraft.
  3. The suspect was sent from Saudi Arabia to the UAE late Thursday, October 1. Both pilots returned with an Emirati security team. Earlier descriptions of questioning in Saudi Arabia or an expected transfer are now outdated. Security-accompanied transfer does not establish a particular extradition procedure, remand order or charging decision.
  4. UAE Attorney-General Hamad Saif Al Shamsi ordered specialised public prosecutors to investigate on October 1, coordinating with the civil aviation authority and other relevant bodies. The inquiry covers the circumstances, motive, possible terrorist activity, prior planning and outside direction. Saudi and Emirati officials participated in the initial investigation. Israeli officials are also investigating or seeking involvement, including questioning after the transfer; no completed Israeli interview or scheduled questioning date is established.
  5. Smit Machchhar was the injured captain—not the attacking co-pilot. Some early accounts reversed those roles, and inconsistent spellings made the same Indian captain appear under several names. The newer preliminary finding resolves that central distinction, but not every action either man took inside the cockpit. The suspect’s public name and specified criminal charges remain unestablished.
  6. Machchhar is now reported stable and recovering in an Abu Dhabi hospital. He initially received treatment in Tabuk for reported head and hand wounds and underwent surgery. Severe early descriptions were followed by updates that he was stable, out of danger and recovering well. India’s ambassador to the UAE, Deepak Mittal, visited him. An earlier destination account placed him in Dubai; whether that described an intermediate movement or an error remains unresolved. Abu Dhabi is the current location account. The injured suspect has no comparable final recovery update.
  7. The badly injured captain reportedly unlocked or opened the cockpit door, allowing help to enter. Passengers and crew restrained the attacker and pulled him out. The reported restraint included headphone cables. Two pilots travelling off duty, also described as reserve pilots, reportedly helped regain control, stabilise the aircraft and land it.
  8. A passenger, Yaniv Hayun, reportedly used a chokehold to remove the attacker, then returned to the cockpit and pulled back the controls before another pilot took over. That remains a recollection, not an independently verified reconstruction of the aircraft’s movements. Who first restrained the attacker, who first moved the controls, and which pilots handled the subsequent flight and landing remain unsettled.
  9. A dentist travelling as a passenger reportedly treated the captain’s heavy bleeding from his head and hands. His name appears as Shota Musayv, Shota Musayev and Musaev Shota; an authoritative spelling and the precise treatment method are not established. The restrained suspect reportedly asked to be killed. That recollection does not establish a clinical diagnosis, a settled suicidal state or a motive.
  10. Passenger Miriam Okayion, also rendered Aion, experienced shaking, a rapid descent and blood aboard, and feared the aircraft would crash. Another account describes her reassuring fellow passengers. One count identifies four Israeli passengers entering the cockpit. A promised special award for five Israeli passengers recognises assistance more broadly; it does not establish that five entered the cockpit or operated the controls. The award’s name, presentation date and complete recipient list remain unestablished. Narendra Modi and Benjamin Netanyahu praised the captain’s actions, and Netanyahu also praised the assisting passengers.
  11. The aircraft lost thousands of feet rapidly, but its exact descent profile remains unsettled. One account describes 33,000 to 17,000 feet in about a minute: a 16,000-foot difference. Another describes 34,000 to about 16,600 feet in roughly 90 to 100 seconds: about 17,400 feet. A shorter interval is described as 14,000 feet in about 30 seconds. These are different endpoints and intervals, not interchangeable measurements.
  12. Other estimates include more than 14,000 feet in 29 seconds, specifically 14,125 feet in one account, and 14,300 or 15,075 feet in 37 seconds. Longer estimates include roughly 17,000 feet in under two minutes, 16,000 feet in two minutes, and 4,000 metres in about a minute. Another pairs an initial altitude near 34,000 feet with about 15,600 feet later. Broader descriptions range from about 13,000 to 20,000 feet.
  13. One account contains a factor-of-ten discrepancy: more than 1,400 feet in seconds, then around 14,000 feet later. Another describes a drop, a brief climb and a second descent; a separate estimate puts stabilisation at about five minutes. Matching timestamped altitude samples and altitude definitions are unavailable. The figures must not be averaged, added together or turned into a definitive flight profile. The descent alone does not prove an intent to crash.
  14. The aircraft transmitted an unlawful-interference alert between two general-emergency codes: 7700, then 7500, then 7700 again. The first change is placed about seven minutes after the initial alert. Exact switch times and who selected each code remain unknown. The codes are not a recording of everything said over the radio, and they do not establish motive. Israel scrambled fighter aircraft as a precaution; a particular interception, escort or aircraft type is not established.
  15. FZ1073 landed safely at Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz International Airport in Tabuk, northern Saudi Arabia. It had been flying from Dubai International Airport to Ben Gurion on September 30. The more specific aircraft identification is a Boeing 737 MAX 8, registration A6-FKF, manufacturer serial number 61013 and construction number 8422. That identification has not been independently confirmed through a complete airline aircraft statement.
  16. The reported departure was 7:05 a.m. Dubai time, or 03:05 UTC; a conflicting account gives 6:05 a.m. local. Reported landing was 9:45 a.m. Saudi time, or 06:45 UTC. These clocks have not been independently reconciled. The emergency is placed roughly two to two-and-a-half hours into the flight. An approximate 05:25 UTC event time is not a departure time and cannot settle the entire chronology.
  17. The Israeli destination does not mean the assault happened over Israel. Tracking descriptions place the incident above Saudi Arabia, south-southeast of Tabarjal. Other route accounts describe the Saudi–Jordanian transition, entry into Jordanian airspace and a turn back toward Tabuk. A claim placing the stabbing as the aircraft entered Israeli airspace conflicts with that route description and remains unestablished. Without timestamped positions for individual cockpit actions, their precise locations cannot be assigned.
  18. A safe landing does not mean an undamaged aircraft. Photographs and reports describe tail or rudder damage, including an allegation that part of the rudder was missing. The damage classification is substantial, but no supplied technical inspection establishes its extent, timing or cause. Neither the images nor the classification justify a claim about how close the structure came to failure.
  19. The most explicit breakdown is 174 passengers and eight crew, implying 182 people by arithmetic—not an independently verified manifest. Another total is 180; an earlier approximation is nearly 200. Other counts use 174 as everyone aboard, or describe more than 170, more than 150, 160 to 180, and even 127. They cannot all be treated as the same count.
  20. No death is reported. Passengers were described as safe and accounted for, but the complete injury inventory remains open. Three passengers reportedly had minor injuries. That can coexist with no serious injuries; it cannot be reconciled with an unqualified claim of no injuries. Both operating pilots were injured. Descriptions of more than 20 or about 30 children, four Americans and at least one U.S. citizen likewise lack a complete roster to reconcile them.
  21. The passengers subsequently reached Israel on a rescue or replacement flight. Their reported Ben Gurion arrival was around 18:40 local, or 15:40 UTC, on September 30, but the exact clock time and flight details are not independently established. Flydubai reportedly sent two aircraft to retrieve them. An eight-hour wait is described in one account, not established as every passenger’s individual waiting time.
  22. The suspension now affects 1,800 travellers stranded in Dubai—not 1,800 people from FZ1073. Repatriation flights were approved to begin Friday, October 2. El Al, Israir and Arkia planned rescue flights, and Israel’s Transportation Ministry asked Etihad to increase Abu Dhabi–Tel Aviv service. Approval and plans do not confirm particular departures or arrivals. Flydubai’s suspension has been described as temporary, lasting several days or a week; no verified fixed end date or confirmed resumption is established.
  23. The co-pilot’s reported Omani citizenship raises an eligibility question, not proof of motive. Israel is examining whether assigning him breached an aviation agreement described as permitting pilots from countries with diplomatic relations with Israel to land there. Oman has no formal diplomatic relations with Israel. The Israeli Civil Aviation Authority was asked to examine compliance, and increased pilot checks were announced. Neither a breach finding nor completed implementation of those checks is established. “Ammani” in some accounts should not create a different nationality. His employment history also remains unsettled, including an account placing his Flydubai service at less than a year.
  24. The weapon remains unidentified forensically. A knife, penknife and possible axe have been discussed, but none is an established identification. How a weapon came aboard, what cockpit access and door controls allowed, and whether hiring or screening missed a demonstrable warning remain unanswered. Suggestions about repeated checks, door overrides or a deliberately induced dive are analysis, not findings of a specific security failure.
  25. Terrorism, radicalisation, sabotage and an intended crash remain assessments under examination. Claims of Islamist indoctrination and social-media discussion of killing Jews lack independently established supporting evidence. Mental illness, a politically motivated attack and other possibilities remain under investigation. An initial suggestion that the suspect acted alone is not a final conclusion. An early assessment against hijacking has been overtaken by a broader investigation of assault and possible unlawful takeover—not by a final terrorism verdict.
  26. The incident is already a political issue before an expected late-October Israeli election. Supporters of Netanyahu frame it as vindicating security warnings; opponents accuse the government of exploiting it and cite earlier security failures. Polling descriptions place his bloc slightly higher but still short of a majority in the 120-seat Knesset, without enough numerical detail to isolate an incident-specific change. No demonstrated electoral effect is established, and no specific intelligence warning of an event like this has been identified in his public account.
  27. A conditional threat to hit Iran “very hard” now hangs over an investigation that has not established an Iranian connection. The suggestion of involvement remains unsubstantiated; no supporting details establish a link. A separate preliminary assessment places Iranian involvement and outside connections in the too-early-to-determine category. Preparations to send another 9,000 U.S. troops to the Middle East add a military backdrop, not evidence about this assault.
  28. The answer to the central question is therefore narrower than the retaliation rhetoric: investigators have preliminarily identified an assault by the co-pilot, both injured pilots have moved to the UAE, the captain is recovering, and the passengers completed their onward journey. The exact cockpit sequence, final intent and motive remain unresolved. No investigating-authority finding established through October 2 connects Iran to the attack.

来源

185 个来源86 家媒体82 个视频1 篇通稿

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。