政治 · 绿党内部分裂持续报道 · 第 2 篇，共 2 篇

5名绿党议员中有4人反对犹太复国主义动议。如今波兰斯基反对其原文措辞

几天来面对一连串未获回应的问题后，绿党领袖表示，若按原文表决，他不会支持这项动议。他的澄清仍未解决已通过的政策及其对党员的影响。

播出 文字 阅读需 11 分钟102 个来源HeyDay News Desk · About usWatch report
与 HeyDex 一起探索

通过 RSS 关注

原语言视频

文字实录 · 正在加载

译自英文原文。

持续报道第 7 天

2 篇报道73 家媒体102 个来源5 个视频

完整报道
  • 暂无标注日期的事件
  1. 第 1 次更新绿党投票认定犹太复国主义是种族主义,犹太成员落泪;以色列禁止缺席投票的党领袖入境
  2. 第 2 次更新5名绿党议员中有4人反对犹太复国主义动议。如今波兰斯基反对其原文措辞当前位置

自上次报道以来的变化

3 天后

当时

绿党投票认定犹太复国主义是种族主义,犹太成员落泪;以色列禁止缺席投票的党领袖入境

我们当时说尚无定论的问题

  1. 通过的动议是否包含提交文本中关于“巴勒斯坦行动”的条款。

    尚无定论

    尚未核实大会通过文本的完整内容，因此无法确认其中关于将“巴勒斯坦行动”组织从禁止名单中移除的条款，以及关于非暴力直接行动被拘留者的条款是保留还是删除。波兰斯基另行表达的反对禁令立场，并不能决定党员大会的决议。 953

  2. 以色列入境禁令的法律机制，以及接下来会采取哪些措施。

    尚无定论

    吉迪恩·萨尔于10月4日宣布这项入境禁令，并称其是与相关当局协调实施的。禁令的法律依据、执行文件、有效期、上诉程序及后续措施均尚未明确。 21

  3. 有多少党员离开，以及是否有人就该政策提起法律诉讼。

    尚无定论

    戴维斯离党增加了一个有记录可查的案例，但目前仍没有全面的辞职人数统计。没有证据表明已有人提起法律诉讼，或平等与人权委员会已宣布展开调查。 54882

  4. 补选结果；计票一直持续到10月9日星期五。

    已有答案

  5. 波兰斯基对以色列入境禁令有何评论，以及是否有更多犹太成员辞职。

    尚无定论

    尚无证据表明波兰斯基针对以色列的入境禁令作出过具体回应。利希滕斯坦是否辞职，以及之后是否还有其他犹太成员离开，目前均未得到确认。 4688

现在

几天来面对一连串未获回应的问题后，绿党领袖表示，若按原文表决，他不会支持这项动议。他的澄清仍未解决已通过的政策及其对党员的影响。

此后已有答案

  1. 补选结果；计票一直持续到10月9日星期五。

    工党的萨加尔·阿卜迪-瓦利以12,292票战胜波兰斯基的8,928票，领先3,364票。结果无法证明该动议对选举产生了什么影响。 7099

绿党5名议员中有4人反对党员通过的犹太复国主义动议。如今，该党领袖也表示，若按原文表决，他同样不会投赞成票。扎克·波兰斯基在2026年10月9日上午作出的澄清，凸显出鲜明的分歧：该党有一项政策，多数议会代表曾投票反对，而党领袖则称其“并不完善”。1 90 93

波兰斯基在接受BBC早餐节目采访时表示，他会支持经修订的版本。这回答了他在补选竞选期间屡次回避的部分问题。但这并不能证明党员大会的决定已经修订或撤回，现有报道也没有提供他希望作出的修改的完整措辞。89 93

HeyDay News于10月6日报道，布莱顿党员大会通过了该动议，犹太成员对此感到痛苦且意见分裂，以色列则宣布禁止波兰斯基入境。这些是争端的背景，并非新的决定。此后，前党领袖卡罗琳·卢卡斯的批评升级，一名威尔士副领袖离党，波兰斯基也在霍尔本和圣潘克拉斯补选中落败，但坚持表示自己可以继续领导该党。

领导层面临的问题已不再只是波兰斯基拒绝解释自己的立场，而是他解释自己的立场，并不会改变该党的立场。

党员大会的决定与否决事项

英格兰和威尔士绿党党员于10月4日在布莱顿以1,022票对813票通过了由卢布娜·斯佩坦提出的A105号动议。动议将犹太复国主义界定为一种种族主义形式，并将这一意识形态描述为支持“民族国家主义的犹太国家”。动议支持建立一个“涵盖整个历史上的巴勒斯坦、包括现代以色列领土在内的单一民主巴勒斯坦国”。9 3 5

此前报道的文本设想人人享有平等权利、耶路撒冷为首都，以及巴勒斯坦人享有回归权。支持者区分了反对一种政治意识形态与敌视犹太人。但意识形态宣言也引出了一个实际的党员身份问题：认同犹太复国主义，或属于认同犹太复国主义的社群组织的犹太党员，将会如何？9 34

党员大会否决了一项旨在保护认同犹太复国主义的犹太人免受不利后果影响的修正案。此前报道提到，该修正案旨在保护他们免受因加入认同犹太复国主义的犹太会堂和犹太团体而遭受的施压或纪律处分。波兰斯基支持了这项未获通过的修正案，但离开布莱顿前往伦敦参加竞选活动，没有参与最终投票。他的缺席既不等于投票支持该动议，也不等于投票反对该动议。1 3 12

10月8日选举日当天，ITV记者多次追问波兰斯基，犹太复国主义是否是种族主义，以及他为何没有投票。波兰斯基没有在那番问答中作答，只表示自己正在与居民交谈，之后会发表讲话。他随后在次日早晨作出的澄清取代了此前未作回答的立场；旧画面不能证明他仍拒绝表明看法。4 90 93

选举失利后的领导力辩护

卢卡斯在《Newsnight》节目中说，波兰斯基“未能展现领导力”。BBC报道称，她没有支持他继续担任党领袖；《赫芬顿邮报》的报道也称，她拒绝表态是否应由他下台。拒绝支持事关重大，但不应将其夸大成已明确要求他辞职。2 61

安迪·伯纳姆10月8日在柏林发表讲话，呼吁绿党领导层撤销该动议，理由是其单一国家立场排除了两国方案。首相也敦促撤销。这些是政治诉求，并非对绿党具有约束力的决定，报道也没有证实动议已经撤销。3 4

补选结果公布后，有人问波兰斯基能否继续担任党领袖，他回答说：“我当然可以继续干下去。”他还提到了“正在持续的种族灭绝以及巴勒斯坦人民被迫流离失所”。以色列否认其在加沙的行动构成种族灭绝；南非提起的案件正在国际法院审理，尚无最终司法裁决。没有证据表明他已辞职、被免职，或党内领导权竞逐已经结束。2 3

关键事实

  1. 12,292工党胜选候选人萨加尔·阿卜迪-瓦利所得票数 70
  2. 8,928绿党候选人扎克·波兰斯基所得票数 99
  3. 3,364工党的胜选多数票差 7099

投票于10月8日举行，结果于10月9日公布。卡姆登区议会确认阿卜迪-瓦利当选，投票率为38.76%；《卡姆登新报》提供了波兰斯基的得票数。投票率不是任何一位候选人的得票率，计算准确得票率所需的有效票总数也未能确定。70 99

BBC形容绿党位列第二，称这是该党在威斯敏斯特补选中第二好的成绩，且远远领先于其他成绩。具体排名依据和完整的历史对比尚未得到独立核实。这给了波兰斯基一个可引以为据的亮眼表现，但仍然是一场失利。没有选民调查能证明犹太复国主义动议在多大程度上帮了他或拖累了他。2

归属感是眼下最实际的考验

菲尔·戴维斯于10月6日辞去威尔士绿党副领袖职务并取消党籍。他已入党7年，并于2024年当选副领袖。我们此前的报道已经指出，塞夫顿区议员基兰·达姆斯、前区议员安德烈·弗里兹以及国际特赦组织英国分会主席桑迪·拉思文也已离开；不应把他们算作新发现的辞职案例。目前没有该动议引发成员离开的全面统计。5 82 83 49

犹太绿党主席薇薇安·利希滕斯坦已入党29年，她表示自己“完全可能”离开，并称该动议“越过了一条界线”。她正在考虑离开，并不等于已确认辞职。一些犹太成员支持该动议；另一些人则担心自己在党内的成员资格已岌岌可危。波兰斯基保证，不会有人仅仅因为信仰或礼拜地点而受到冷遇；这一表态原则上回应了这种担忧，却没有提供各方认可的纪律保障。1 46 30

BBC报道称，党员人数较前一年增长了三倍以上。《耶路撒冷邮报》10月6日的另一篇报道给出的党员人数为230,000，但官方统计日期和数字确认情况均未明确。这些数字无法得出可靠的起始党员人数。党内批评者关于新成员属于极左派或有人有组织地渗透的说法，也与有记录可查的增长情况是两回事：没有经核实的人口统计或投票细目能证实这些说法。2 49

工党和自由民主党议员将此事提交平等与人权委员会。提交审查并不等于展开调查、认定存在歧视或判定行为违法。截至10月9日核查的报道，没有证据表明平等与人权委员会已宣布展开调查，或有人已提起法律诉讼；但这一证据缺口并不能证明不存在相关程序。48 81

尚无公开日期显示将举行下一次政策投票、作出领导层决定或进行法律听证。选举已经结束，波兰斯基个人的立场也更加明确。但党员大会究竟通过了什么，以及党员将如何受到相关政策对待，仍有待回答。

来源及支持性参考资料

广播及初步报道：Sky News 1；BBC News 2 3 5；ITV News 4 7；Channel 4 News 6；《每日电讯报》8。

政策及党员大会参考资料：绿党 9；A105文本 10 53；路透社 11；《犹太新闻》12；Middle East Eye 13；BBC 14；《犹太纪事报》15；《贝尔法斯特电讯报》16；VERITY 17；Action Network 18；《以色列时报》29；《独立报》31 58；《泰晤士报》32；巴勒斯坦绿党 33；Brixton Buzz 34；Argus 35；《耶路撒冷邮报》44；stated.news 45；“犹太复国主义不是种族主义”54；Brighton Journal 55；Novara Media 56；Anadolu 57；The Intelligent 59；KioskNews 60。

入境禁令报道：Euronews 19；《独立报》20 51；以色列国 21；Ynet 22；《以色列时报》23；InView 24；《犹太纪事报》25；Standard 26；VINnews 27；Dublin Post 28；《犹太新闻》36；Virtual Jerusalem 38；Al-Monitor 86；《国土报》87。

党员人数及各方回应：Left Foot Forward 30；Ground News 37；《犹太新闻》39 48；《独立报》43；BBC 46 82 83 96；《犹太纪事报》47 52；《耶路撒冷邮报》49；Metro 50；GB News 80；Londonlovesbusiness 81；《每日电讯报》84；犹太电讯社 85；Standard 88。

领导层后续报道：HuffPost 61；《卫报》62；《独立报》63 68；Standard 64；National 65；BBC 66 90 92；LBC 67；BBC内容转载 69 89 94 95；Brit Brief 91；Vaultz News 93。

选举参考资料：British Political Data 40；BBC 41 71 72 97；伦敦大学学院 42；卡姆登区议会 70；《独立报》73 74 79 101；维基百科 75；RTÉ 76；Standard 77 78 100；Parliament News 98；《卡姆登新报》99；versus 102。

播出原貌 25 行
  1. On October 6 we reported the Greens’ Zionism vote. Now Polanski rejects its unamended wording. Four of five Green MPs opposed it, and senior members have left. Will the party change the policy?
  2. Zack Polanski now says he wouldn’t have voted for the motion as passed. On the morning of October 9, he called it “imperfect” and said he would have supported an amended version. His explanation follows days of unanswered questions.
  3. His reservations leave the adopted policy in place. They also come after a by-election defeat and criticism from former Green leader Caroline Lucas. The dispute now reaches beyond his personal position to how the party will treat members who identify as Zionist.
  4. Conference members adopted a policy defining Zionism as a form of racism. Proposed by Lubna Speitan, it describes the ideology through support for an ethnonationalist Jewish state. It backs a single democratic Palestinian state throughout historic Palestine, including modern-day Israel.
  5. The motion passed by 1,022 votes to 813 on October 4. Its previously published wording envisaged equal rights for everyone, Jerusalem as the capital and a Palestinian right of return. Supporters distinguish opposition to a political ideology from hostility toward Jewish people. Critics question what that distinction means for Jewish members who consider themselves Zionist.
  6. Polanski left Brighton before the final vote to campaign in Holborn and St Pancras. He backed an amendment that was rejected, then took no part in the vote that adopted the policy. His morning remarks explain how he would have voted.
  7. Four of the party’s five MPs opposed the motion. Members also rejected an amendment intended to protect Jewish people who identify as Zionist from repercussions. That proposed protection covered pressure or discipline connected to Zionist-identifying synagogues and Jewish organisations.
  8. On election day, October 8, Polanski repeatedly declined questions about whether Zionism is racism and why he hadn’t voted. He said he was talking to residents and would speak later. His eventual clarification changes that unanswered position, although the full wording of the amendments he wanted still isn’t clear.
  9. Caroline Lucas said Polanski had “failed to show leadership.” She criticised his handling of the dispute and his absence from the debate. Asked about him continuing as leader, she declined to endorse him, but also declined to say whether he should stand down.
  10. Andy Burnham urged Green leaders to reverse the motion and ensure it didn’t remain party policy. Speaking in Berlin on October 8, he argued that its single-state position ruled out a two-state solution. The prime minister also called for reversal.
  11. Polanski insisted he could remain leader after losing the by-election. Asked whether he could continue, he said, “of course I can carry on.” In those post-result remarks, he hadn’t yet explicitly rejected the motion. That clarification came later in the morning.
  12. He also spoke of an “ongoing genocide and the displacement of the Palestinian people.” Israel denies that its actions in Gaza amount to genocide. South Africa’s case against Israel is before the International Court of Justice, where the accusation awaits a final judicial determination.
  13. Labour’s Sagal Abdi-Wali won Holborn and St Pancras with 12,292 votes. Polanski received 8,928, giving Labour a majority of 3,364. Voting took place on October 8, and the results were published on October 9. The Greens finished second.
  14. Turnout was 38.76%. The Greens’ showing was reportedly their second-best ever in a Westminster by-election. That strong placing supports Polanski’s defence of his leadership, but voters elected Labour’s candidate. Nobody has measured how much this motion helped or hurt him.
  15. The Conservatives finished third with 1,922 votes, ahead of Reform UK. Reform received 1,612 votes and Restore Britain 692, putting Reform ahead of Restore in the published totals.
  16. Phil Davies resigned as Welsh Green deputy leader and cancelled his membership on October 6. He’d belonged to the party for seven years and became deputy in 2024. Kieran Dams, the 23-year-old Waterloo ward councillor in Sefton, also left to sit as an independent.
  17. The departures already included former councillor Andrée Frieze and Sandy Ruthven, chair of Amnesty International UK. Further councillors have left, but there’s no complete count of members leaving over the motion.
  18. Jewish Greens chair Vivien Lichtenstein has belonged to the party for 29 years. She said it was “quite possible” she would leave and that the motion “crosses a line.” She also wanted scrutiny of recently joined members. Her departure hasn’t been confirmed.
  19. Jewish members hold different views. Some supported the motion, while others fear for their place in the party. Polanski has said nobody should be made unwelcome because of their faith or where they worship. Members still need to know what safeguards would apply if the policy became a basis for discipline.
  20. Greens for Palestine says Palestinians and anti-Zionist Jews drafted the motion, with more than 40 Palestinian liberation organisations endorsing it. Membership reportedly grew more than threefold in a year. A separate figure of 230,000 members lacks an official date or confirmation.
  21. Those figures can’t give a reliable starting membership. Internal critics say the influx included hard-left campaigners focused on the Middle East. Some allege organised infiltration. Party growth alone doesn’t show who newcomers are, how they voted or whether they coordinated their arrival.
  22. Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs asked the Equality and Human Rights Commission to consider whether the policy broke the law. An investigation hasn’t been announced. The practical concern is whether members could face exclusion, pressure or discipline, and what protections the party would provide.
  23. Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar announced Polanski’s entry bar on October 4. The decision was described as “coordinated with the relevant authorities.” That announcement was part of the earlier dispute. The bar’s duration and appeal process still aren’t clear.
  24. It’s also unclear whether the final policy retained calls to lift the Palestine Action ban and release people detained for nonviolent direct action. Polanski separately opposes that ban. His position doesn’t settle which clauses conference adopted.
  25. The Greens haven’t announced a date for another policy decision. Polanski has clarified that he would have opposed the motion as written, and the by-election has ended in defeat. His personal reservations leave the conference policy in place, while its application to Jewish and Zionist-identifying members remains unresolved.

来源

102 个来源63 家媒体5 个视频3 篇通稿

来源地图

追溯本篇报道的依据。图谱展示其关联；下方链接可打开本文引用的来源。

来源图谱将在您阅读时加载。

探索完整的新闻编辑室图谱 ↗

译文更新于

修订记录

  1. r1首次发布。