报道持续报道 · 第 2 篇，共 5 篇
被拒之门外、联手行动、走上法庭：白宫新闻禁令迎来首位法官
原语言视频
译自英文原文。
自上次报道以来的变化
4 天后
当时
三家新闻机构被告知不得进入：白宫为新闻媒体划出界线当时尚无定论
- 没有经核实的禁令执行负责人，没有说明纠正问题的标准，也没有确认接下来会有哪些媒体机构被禁。
- 作为理由所引用的96%和93%报道数据，没有经核实的依据。
我们说过将关注的
- 证件是否会被正式吊销，或出入权限是否会被悄然限制。
- 是否会诉诸法院，裁定总统能否选择哪些新闻机构可以进入。
现在
CNN、MS NOW 和 Politico 将在周三的听证会上请求蒂莫西·凯利法官恢复白宫记者证；与此同时，竞争电视网让电视记者团保持停摆，白宫则以公平为由为禁令辩护。
新的进展
- 蒂莫西·J·凯利法官通过视频会议听取要求恢复准入的紧急申请。
禁令、拒之门外与诉讼
9月21日星期一，三家机构和上述三名记者共同向哥伦比亚特区联邦地区法院提起诉讼，案号为1:26-cv-03287。他们请求法院签发临时限制令和禁令，立即恢复记者证及准入并禁止进一步执行相关措施，同时请求宣告性救济。被告包括以总统官方身份被起诉的特朗普、通信主任 Steven Cheung、特勤局局长 Sean Curran 和幕僚长 Susie Wiles。律师团队包括 Gibson Dunn 的 Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.，他也曾在2018年围绕 Jim Acosta 的争端中代理 CNN。诉状称，这项禁令是对第一修正案最直接不过的攻击，并表示它威胁新闻自由和公众获得独立新闻报道的权利。283731
两项主张，一项先例
3提起诉讼要求恢复准入的新闻机构 28
4拒绝替代的竞争电视网 1
92%万斯援引的负面报道比例 6
摄像机位置空着
这项禁令破坏了记者团制度；该制度为所有媒体安排一台摄像机进入现场。由 CBS、ABC、NBC、CNN 和 Fox 组成的五家电视网记者团轮流承担报道任务；在第81届联合国大会高级别周期间，CNN 负责周一和周二在纽约的值班报道。白宫阻止 CNN 入内后，担任记者团主席的 Fox News 华盛顿分社社长 Bryan Boughton 发邮件称，从当天起，电视记者团将不再报道被指定为总统记者团报道的活动，也不会安排替代媒体。ABC、CBS、Fox News 和 NBC 拒绝替代 CNN，并在联合声明中表示，公众有重大利益需要获得独立信息，任何政府都不应因不满某家媒体的报道而限制其采访。结果是，特朗普在纽约期间没有美国电视网记者团。36061
周一，副总统 JD·万斯在安德鲁斯联合基地停机坪上、前往北卡罗来纳州途中，为白宫作出政治辩护。他否认这是禁令。他说，特朗普只是不给那些从事实质上属于宣传、极左宣传的媒体特殊准入权和办公空间。他表示，这三家媒体仍可在外部报道、使用公开材料并采访官员；他称此举是基本的公平，并称关于特朗普和本届政府的报道约有92%为负面，不能代表美国人民或公众舆论。他将 Politico 对待特朗普的立场比作 Breitbart 对待奥巴马和拜登的立场。这个数字与对第二任期最初100天内三家广播电视网晚间报道的一项统计相符，并非专门针对 CNN、MS NOW 和 Politico 的已发表研究；在这段对话中，他也没有为该数字提供来源。67174
已知
未知
- 目前尚无裁决说明记者证是否会立即恢复，还是在诉讼期间继续吊销。
- 被撤销的具体准入权限及其期限尚不明确，范围可能从长期通行证到办公室，再到记者团轮值。
后续
- 凯利是否仅以正当程序为由恢复准入，还是也会审理观点歧视主张。
- 电视和摄影媒体的声援是否会持续；若持续，记者团职责将如何覆盖。
时间线
第 5 天 · 5 篇报道
最先报道
我们的播报 · 第 1 次更新
三家新闻机构被告知不得进入：白宫为新闻媒体划出界线我们的播报 · 第 2 次更新当前位置
被拒之门外、联手行动、走上法庭：白宫新闻禁令迎来首位法官凯利发布首份临时限制令，恢复通行证持有者的采访权限。
我们的播报 · 第 3 次更新较新
记者通行证恢复了，CNN 的空军一号席位却没有11天后
法官将采访权限保护延长至 10 月 13 日，同时考虑更长期的救济。
我们的播报 · 第 4 次更新较新
司法部调查拒绝顶替 CNN 的新闻网络凯利发布初步禁令，在诉讼期间保护采访权限，并审理第一修正案主张。
我们的播报 · 第 5 次更新较新
白宫通行证获保护，但新闻采访权限之争尚未结束
来源64
58家媒体未注明日期：
按媒体查看所有来源
来自 64 家媒体的 88 个来源· 引用最多的优先
X (formerly Twitter)x.com8
- CNN, MS NOW and Politico suing Trump over White House ban https://www.reuters.com/world/cnn-ms-now-politico-file-lawsuit-against-trump-administration-over-white-house-2026-09-21/?taid=6ab142ef80b2010001da41e1&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
- NEW: Judge Tim Kelly has been assigned the lawsuit from POLITICO, CNN and MSNOW demanding immediate restoration of access to the White House The 1st-term Trump appointee handled the 2018 case of Jim Acosta — and sided with the reporter w/ @joshgerstein https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/21/timothy-kelly-judge-white-house-ban-lawsuit-01086120
- Read The Full Text of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico’s Lawsuit Against Trump’s WH Ban: ‘Could Not Be a More Direct Assault on the First Amendment’ https://www.mediaite.com/media/read-the-full-text-of-cnn-ms-now-and-politicos-lawsuit-against-trumps-wh-ban-could-not-be-a-more-direct-assault-on-the-first-amendment
- CNN, MS Now and Politico filed a lawsuit seeking to allow their journalists to enter the White House grounds days after President Donald Trump revoked their access, turning to the courts in their fight over constitutional protections for the press. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/cnn-ms-now-and-politico-to-sue-jointly-over-white-house-ban?taid=6ab141c5bdab48000161112e&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
- Breaking: The three national news outlets President Trump banned from the White House — CNN, MS NOW, and Politico — are filing a critical First Amendment lawsuit to restore their access. Live coverage on @CNNThisMorning with @AudieCornish and @kpolantz 👀 https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/21/politics/cnn-politico-msnow-sue-white-house-access
- NEW: CNN, MS NOW, Politico to sue White House over blocked access https://www.axios.com/2026/09/21/trump-cnn-msnow-politico-suit
- CNN, MS NOW and Politico are suing the Trump administration for stripping their access to the White House, calling it a “direct assault on the First Amendment.” CNN was also removed from its duties for the rotating pool of TV journalists covering the White House. The TV pool announced there would be no replacement to cover the president's trip to New York ahead of the UN General Assembly. @ElizLanders has more.
- CNN, MS NOW and Politico are suing the Trump administration for stripping access to the White House, calling it a “direct assault on the First Amendment.” https://to.pbs.org/4rrzBfU
ABC Newsabcnews.com1 个视频2
CourtListenercourtlistener.com2
The Independentindependent.co.uk最先1 个视频2
播出原貌
- Three major newsrooms are locked out of the White House.
- With the president in New York for United Nations week, no American television pool camera is following him, and still photographers held their pictures for a day.
- Will a federal judge order those passes restored this afternoon, and on what terms?
- The lockout started with an announcement that CNN, MS NOW and Politico were banned effective immediately for fiction and lies and fake news. The president later described it as cumulative about coverage over recent years, not a single story. The next day hard passes were deactivated or taken and reporters were turned away at the complex, including Betsy Klein of CNN, Akayla Gardner of MS NOW and Cheyenne Haslett of Politico. The correspondents association president called for immediate restoration.
- The three organizations plus their three correspondents filed together on Monday in the District Court for the District of Columbia as case 1:26-cv-03287. They seek a temporary restraining order and injunction restoring credentials and access immediately and barring further enforcement, plus declaratory relief. The suit names Donald Trump in his official capacity as president, communications director Steven Cheung, Secret Service director Sean Curran and chief of staff Susie Wiles. Counsel includes Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. of Gibson Dunn, who also represented CNN in the 2018 fight over Jim Acosta.
- The legal attack runs on two tracks. The outlets allege First Amendment retaliation for past coverage called fake, sick and purposely negative, and viewpoint discrimination in White House access, the briefing room and the pool. They allege Fifth Amendment due-process violations because there was no notice and no chance to contest before credentials were pulled after a social-media announcement. The precedent invoked includes Sherrill v. Knight, 569 F.2d 124, decided December 15, 1977, which requires notice, an opportunity to rebut and a written decision, with restrictions no more arduous than necessary and not arbitrary, plus Karem v. Trump from 2020.
- After CNN was blocked, pool chair Bryan Boughton, the Fox News Washington bureau chief, emailed that effective that day the television pool would not cover events designated as presidential pool coverage and would not put a replacement in place. ABC, CBS, Fox News and NBC refused to replace CNN, saying in a joint statement the public has a vital interest in independent information and no administration should restrict an outlet because it objects to reporting. White House listings used Hearst as secondary television in Washington and Real America's Voice as secondary for New York, while the White House promoted its own app and livestreams and argued access is a privilege, not a First Amendment right.
- On a Joint Base Andrews tarmac before a North Carolina trip, the vice president rejected the word ban. He said Trump was withholding special access and office space from outlets engaged in effectively propaganda and far-left propaganda. He said the three outlets can still report from outside, use public materials and talk to officials, called the move basic fairness, and put coverage of Trump and the administration at about 92 percent negative and not representative of the American people or public opinion. He compared Politico's stance toward Trump to Breitbart's stance toward Obama and Biden. That number matches a tally of evening coverage on three broadcast networks in the first 100 days of the second term, not a published study of CNN, MS NOW and Politico specifically, and he did not source the number in the exchange.
- Still photographers joined for a day. The Washington Post and photographers from the New York Times, AP, AFP, Reuters and Getty withheld publication of Trump images until midnight Tuesday, a one-day image blackout that left no images Monday. United Nations coverage operates under a separate credentialing system, so correspondents could still appear on UN passes even without a White House pool, but there was no traditional American network pool on the New York travel.
- History in the same courthouse weighs heavily. After a November 7, 2018 news conference dispute, Judge Kelly held a hearing on November 16, 2018 and ordered the administration to immediately return Acosta's press pass on a temporary basis, finding a Fifth Amendment due-process violation in a narrow ruling that did not decide the full First Amendment merits. Acosta returned, litigation continued, and Trump said the administration was writing new rules. Kelly is a first-term Trump appointee. Random assignment sent the new case to Kelly. He ordered a Justice Department response by Tuesday night and set an expedited videoconference hearing for Wednesday afternoon at 3:30 p.m. Eastern on restoring access.
- Trump answered the new case by saying it was not an assault on the free press he cherishes, but on fake news, which he called a national-security threat. He later said drawing Kelly again was a great judge for them, recalled the Acosta ruling and previewed an appeal. Reporters without hard passes cannot enter the briefing room, upper press offices or the pool rotation that documents the presidency up close, leaving three major newsrooms working off campus while the camera position built to guarantee independent witness sits empty. A draft amicus from the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press was circulating, with AP, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, ProPublica, Axios, Bloomberg and Reuters reported as considering or signing in draft status, not as a filed brief.
- The hearing will decide whether credentials come back now or stay revoked while the case proceeds, what precise access was revoked — credentials, presence on grounds, briefing room, offices, pool rotation, office space and special access — and how long the revocation is intended to last, and whether the solidarity suspension continues and how pool duties are covered if it does.
译文更新于
